基于印度尼西亚各省幸福指数成分的 K-Means 和模糊 C-Means 聚类算法比较

Inna Auliya, Fadhilah Fitri, N. Amalita, dan Tessy, Octavia Mukhti
{"title":"基于印度尼西亚各省幸福指数成分的 K-Means 和模糊 C-Means 聚类算法比较","authors":"Inna Auliya, Fadhilah Fitri, N. Amalita, dan Tessy, Octavia Mukhti","doi":"10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cluster analysis is a multivariate technique aimed at grouping objects into several clusters based on the characteristics they possess. This study aims to determine the clustering results of 34 provinces in Indonesia based on the indicators of the happiness index for the year 2021 by comparing non-hierarchical cluster analysis methods, namely K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means. K-Means is a non-hierarchical cluster analysis that divides objects into cluster groups based on the distance of objects to the nearest cluster center, while Fuzzy C-Means is a cluster analysis that uses a fuzzy grouping model where data becomes a member of a cluster formed based on membership degrees ranging from 0 to 1. Based on the research results, it is known that clustering with both K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means methods forms three clusters. Based on the standard deviation values between groups and the standard deviation ratio, the best method is the Fuzzy C-Means method because it has a larger standard deviation between groups and a smaller ratio compared to the K-Means method, which is 0.6680004. Therefore, this study concludes that the Fuzzy C-Means method is more optimal than the K-Means method.","PeriodicalId":220933,"journal":{"name":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means Algorithms for Clustering Based on Happiness Index Components Across Provinces in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Inna Auliya, Fadhilah Fitri, N. Amalita, dan Tessy, Octavia Mukhti\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cluster analysis is a multivariate technique aimed at grouping objects into several clusters based on the characteristics they possess. This study aims to determine the clustering results of 34 provinces in Indonesia based on the indicators of the happiness index for the year 2021 by comparing non-hierarchical cluster analysis methods, namely K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means. K-Means is a non-hierarchical cluster analysis that divides objects into cluster groups based on the distance of objects to the nearest cluster center, while Fuzzy C-Means is a cluster analysis that uses a fuzzy grouping model where data becomes a member of a cluster formed based on membership degrees ranging from 0 to 1. Based on the research results, it is known that clustering with both K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means methods forms three clusters. Based on the standard deviation values between groups and the standard deviation ratio, the best method is the Fuzzy C-Means method because it has a larger standard deviation between groups and a smaller ratio compared to the K-Means method, which is 0.6680004. Therefore, this study concludes that the Fuzzy C-Means method is more optimal than the K-Means method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚类分析是一种多变量技术,旨在根据对象所具有的特征将其分为若干组。本研究旨在通过比较 K-Means 和模糊 C-Means 这两种非层次聚类分析方法,确定印度尼西亚 34 个省基于 2021 年幸福指数指标的聚类结果。K-Means 是一种非层次聚类分析方法,它根据对象到最近聚类中心的距离将对象划分为聚类组,而模糊 C-Means 是一种聚类分析方法,它使用模糊分组模型,数据根据 0 到 1 的成员度成为一个聚类的成员。根据组间标准偏差值和标准偏差比,最佳方法是模糊 C-Means 方法,因为与 K-Means 方法相比,它的组间标准偏差更大,标准偏差比更小,为 0.6680004。因此,本研究得出结论,模糊 C-Means 方法比 K-Means 方法更为理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means Algorithms for Clustering Based on Happiness Index Components Across Provinces in Indonesia
Cluster analysis is a multivariate technique aimed at grouping objects into several clusters based on the characteristics they possess. This study aims to determine the clustering results of 34 provinces in Indonesia based on the indicators of the happiness index for the year 2021 by comparing non-hierarchical cluster analysis methods, namely K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means. K-Means is a non-hierarchical cluster analysis that divides objects into cluster groups based on the distance of objects to the nearest cluster center, while Fuzzy C-Means is a cluster analysis that uses a fuzzy grouping model where data becomes a member of a cluster formed based on membership degrees ranging from 0 to 1. Based on the research results, it is known that clustering with both K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means methods forms three clusters. Based on the standard deviation values between groups and the standard deviation ratio, the best method is the Fuzzy C-Means method because it has a larger standard deviation between groups and a smaller ratio compared to the K-Means method, which is 0.6680004. Therefore, this study concludes that the Fuzzy C-Means method is more optimal than the K-Means method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信