2015 年至 2019 年印度尼西亚各省贫困指标的双曲线图和 Procrustes 分析

Ade Eriyen Saputri, Admi Salma, N. Amalita, D. Permana
{"title":"2015 年至 2019 年印度尼西亚各省贫困指标的双曲线图和 Procrustes 分析","authors":"Ade Eriyen Saputri, Admi Salma, N. Amalita, D. Permana","doi":"10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poverty is one of the country's problems that the government should  overcome. Poverty is influenced by several indicators. The success of a government can be seen from changes in poverty. This study compares the percentage of Indonesia's poverty indicators at the beginning of office (2015) and the end of office (2019) of one government period. The indicators that most affect the poverty rate in 2015 and 2019 are seen using biplot analysis while to measure the similarity and the magnitude of the percentage change in poverty from 2015 to 2019 can use procrustes analysis. The results of the biplot analysis show that households have access to proper sanitation services as the indicator with the highest diversity in 2015 while in 2019 it is the poor young population (15-24 years old) who are not in school and working or attending training and households have access to decent drinking water sources. Riau Islands, DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, and Bali are the provinces that have the highest values in almost all poverty indicators except the indicator of the percentage of young people (15-24 years old) who are not in school, working or attending training. The results of the procrustean analysis show an increase of 9.7% in Indonesia's poverty indicators in 2019 compared to 2015. So it can be said that the two configurations are very similar.","PeriodicalId":220933,"journal":{"name":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biplot and Procrustes Analysis of Poverty Indicators By Province in Indonesia in 2015 dan 2019\",\"authors\":\"Ade Eriyen Saputri, Admi Salma, N. Amalita, D. Permana\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Poverty is one of the country's problems that the government should  overcome. Poverty is influenced by several indicators. The success of a government can be seen from changes in poverty. This study compares the percentage of Indonesia's poverty indicators at the beginning of office (2015) and the end of office (2019) of one government period. The indicators that most affect the poverty rate in 2015 and 2019 are seen using biplot analysis while to measure the similarity and the magnitude of the percentage change in poverty from 2015 to 2019 can use procrustes analysis. The results of the biplot analysis show that households have access to proper sanitation services as the indicator with the highest diversity in 2015 while in 2019 it is the poor young population (15-24 years old) who are not in school and working or attending training and households have access to decent drinking water sources. Riau Islands, DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, and Bali are the provinces that have the highest values in almost all poverty indicators except the indicator of the percentage of young people (15-24 years old) who are not in school, working or attending training. The results of the procrustean analysis show an increase of 9.7% in Indonesia's poverty indicators in 2019 compared to 2015. So it can be said that the two configurations are very similar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol2-iss1/124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贫困是政府应该克服的国家问题之一。贫困受多项指标的影响。从贫困状况的变化可以看出政府的成功与否。本研究比较了印尼在一届政府执政初期(2015 年)和执政末期(2019 年)的贫困指标比例。使用双曲线分析法可以看出对 2015 年和 2019 年贫困率影响最大的指标,而衡量 2015 年至 2019 年贫困率百分比变化的相似性和幅度可以使用普氏分析法。双图谱分析的结果显示,2015 年,家庭获得适当的卫生服务是多样性最高的指标,而 2019 年,则是未上学、未工作或参加培训的年轻贫困人口(15-24 岁)和家庭获得体面的饮用水源。廖内群岛、雅加达发展区、日惹发展区和巴厘岛是几乎所有贫困指标值最高的省份,但未上学、未工作或参加培训的年轻人(15-24 岁)比例指标除外。procrustean分析结果显示,与2015年相比,2019年印尼的贫困指标增加了9.7%。因此可以说,两者的配置非常相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biplot and Procrustes Analysis of Poverty Indicators By Province in Indonesia in 2015 dan 2019
Poverty is one of the country's problems that the government should  overcome. Poverty is influenced by several indicators. The success of a government can be seen from changes in poverty. This study compares the percentage of Indonesia's poverty indicators at the beginning of office (2015) and the end of office (2019) of one government period. The indicators that most affect the poverty rate in 2015 and 2019 are seen using biplot analysis while to measure the similarity and the magnitude of the percentage change in poverty from 2015 to 2019 can use procrustes analysis. The results of the biplot analysis show that households have access to proper sanitation services as the indicator with the highest diversity in 2015 while in 2019 it is the poor young population (15-24 years old) who are not in school and working or attending training and households have access to decent drinking water sources. Riau Islands, DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, and Bali are the provinces that have the highest values in almost all poverty indicators except the indicator of the percentage of young people (15-24 years old) who are not in school, working or attending training. The results of the procrustean analysis show an increase of 9.7% in Indonesia's poverty indicators in 2019 compared to 2015. So it can be said that the two configurations are very similar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信