非洲通过信仰实体提供心理保健:系统回顾

Q4 Medicine
Nadine Nanji, Jill Olivier
{"title":"非洲通过信仰实体提供心理保健:系统回顾","authors":"Nadine Nanji, Jill Olivier","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychological disturbances and mental illnesses are prevalent on the continent of Africa. There are shortages of mental health services and a lack of quality providers with limited training and supervision.  It is perceived that faith-based entities for psycho-emotional health and wellbeing are filling the gap with positive impact. However, the risks associated with unconventional or extreme spiritual practices will be evaluated.  The contributions of these entities, their roles in the global and African health system, and their implications for community development and policy making are highlighted.\nMethods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted in two phases to synthesise qualitative and quantitative data. The review sought evidence on faith-based health providers of mental health services in Africa looking at types, magnitude, and quality, and included both peer-reviewed and grey literature, published between 2007 and 2024, in English. A narrative thematic analysis was used for the qualitative part and meta-analyses was used for the quantitative part to back up the narrative element of this study.\nResults: This review identified 55 relevant items from 13 African countries. The results showed that faith-based mental health providers deliver a range of six types of alternative mental health care, faith-based home care and faith-based biomedical mental health care. The magnitude of these faith-based mental health services was considered according to frequency of use and availability (accessibility, affordability, and acceptability), but evidence was limited. When the quality of these mental health care was assessed, some studies showed positive mental health outcomes from the utilisation of faith-based mental health care, but some studies revealed bad quality practices due to inhumane treatments.\nConclusion: There are limitations regarding the vast array of faith-based health providers and the mental health care as they provide which include harmful practices used in Africa. Training interventions are needed to avoid some of the inhumane treatments. Faith-based mental health care offers culturally influenced practices for mental health which should be leveraged. Integration of faith-based mental health care into primary health system is advised in order to attain universal health coverage. Finally, possible regulation of traditional and faith healing methods for emotional struggles could be implemented at a policy level.","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing Mental Healthcare through Faith-based Entities in Africa: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Nanji, Jill Olivier\",\"doi\":\"10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Psychological disturbances and mental illnesses are prevalent on the continent of Africa. There are shortages of mental health services and a lack of quality providers with limited training and supervision.  It is perceived that faith-based entities for psycho-emotional health and wellbeing are filling the gap with positive impact. However, the risks associated with unconventional or extreme spiritual practices will be evaluated.  The contributions of these entities, their roles in the global and African health system, and their implications for community development and policy making are highlighted.\\nMethods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted in two phases to synthesise qualitative and quantitative data. The review sought evidence on faith-based health providers of mental health services in Africa looking at types, magnitude, and quality, and included both peer-reviewed and grey literature, published between 2007 and 2024, in English. A narrative thematic analysis was used for the qualitative part and meta-analyses was used for the quantitative part to back up the narrative element of this study.\\nResults: This review identified 55 relevant items from 13 African countries. The results showed that faith-based mental health providers deliver a range of six types of alternative mental health care, faith-based home care and faith-based biomedical mental health care. The magnitude of these faith-based mental health services was considered according to frequency of use and availability (accessibility, affordability, and acceptability), but evidence was limited. When the quality of these mental health care was assessed, some studies showed positive mental health outcomes from the utilisation of faith-based mental health care, but some studies revealed bad quality practices due to inhumane treatments.\\nConclusion: There are limitations regarding the vast array of faith-based health providers and the mental health care as they provide which include harmful practices used in Africa. Training interventions are needed to avoid some of the inhumane treatments. Faith-based mental health care offers culturally influenced practices for mental health which should be leveraged. Integration of faith-based mental health care into primary health system is advised in order to attain universal health coverage. Finally, possible regulation of traditional and faith healing methods for emotional struggles could be implemented at a policy level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Journal for Global Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Journal for Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心理障碍和精神疾病在非洲大陆十分普遍。心理健康服务短缺,高质量的服务提供者缺乏培训和监督。 人们认为,以信仰为基础的心理情感健康和福祉实体正在填补这一空白,并产生了积极影响。然而,与非常规或极端的精神实践相关的风险也将得到评估。 这些实体的贡献、它们在全球和非洲卫生系统中的作用,以及它们对社区发展和政策制定的影响都将得到强调:方法:分两个阶段进行了混合方法系统综述,以综合定性和定量数据。综述从类型、规模和质量等方面寻找有关非洲基于信仰的心理健康服务提供者的证据,包括 2007 年至 2024 年间发表的同行评审和灰色文献,均为英文。定性部分采用了叙述性主题分析,定量部分采用了荟萃分析,以支持本研究的叙述性内容:结果:本综述从 13 个非洲国家确定了 55 个相关项目。结果显示,信仰心理健康服务提供者提供了六种类型的替代性心理健康护理、信仰家庭护理和信仰生物医学心理健康护理。根据使用频率和可用性(可获得性、可负担性和可接受性)来考虑这些信仰心理保健服务的规模,但证据有限。在对这些心理保健服务的质量进行评估时,一些研究表明,利用信仰心理保健服务会产生积极的心理健康效果,但也有一些研究显示,由于不人道的治疗方法,这些服务的质量很差:基于信仰的医疗服务提供者及其所提供的心理保健服务存在局限性,其中包括在非洲使用的有害做法。需要采取培训干预措施来避免一些不人道的治疗方法。基于信仰的心理保健提供了受文化影响的心理保健方法,应当加以利用。建议将信仰心理保健纳入初级保健系统,以实现全民医保。最后,可以在政策层面对传统和信仰治疗方法进行监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Providing Mental Healthcare through Faith-based Entities in Africa: A Systematic Review
Background: Psychological disturbances and mental illnesses are prevalent on the continent of Africa. There are shortages of mental health services and a lack of quality providers with limited training and supervision.  It is perceived that faith-based entities for psycho-emotional health and wellbeing are filling the gap with positive impact. However, the risks associated with unconventional or extreme spiritual practices will be evaluated.  The contributions of these entities, their roles in the global and African health system, and their implications for community development and policy making are highlighted. Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted in two phases to synthesise qualitative and quantitative data. The review sought evidence on faith-based health providers of mental health services in Africa looking at types, magnitude, and quality, and included both peer-reviewed and grey literature, published between 2007 and 2024, in English. A narrative thematic analysis was used for the qualitative part and meta-analyses was used for the quantitative part to back up the narrative element of this study. Results: This review identified 55 relevant items from 13 African countries. The results showed that faith-based mental health providers deliver a range of six types of alternative mental health care, faith-based home care and faith-based biomedical mental health care. The magnitude of these faith-based mental health services was considered according to frequency of use and availability (accessibility, affordability, and acceptability), but evidence was limited. When the quality of these mental health care was assessed, some studies showed positive mental health outcomes from the utilisation of faith-based mental health care, but some studies revealed bad quality practices due to inhumane treatments. Conclusion: There are limitations regarding the vast array of faith-based health providers and the mental health care as they provide which include harmful practices used in Africa. Training interventions are needed to avoid some of the inhumane treatments. Faith-based mental health care offers culturally influenced practices for mental health which should be leveraged. Integration of faith-based mental health care into primary health system is advised in order to attain universal health coverage. Finally, possible regulation of traditional and faith healing methods for emotional struggles could be implemented at a policy level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信