利用机器学习算法检测阿拉伯语需求文档中的模糊之处

Q2 Computer Science
Ahmad Althunibat, Bayan Alsawareah, Siti Sarah Maidin, Belal Hawashin, Iqbal Jebril, Belal Zaqaibeh, Haneen A. Al-khawaja
{"title":"利用机器学习算法检测阿拉伯语需求文档中的模糊之处","authors":"Ahmad Althunibat, Bayan Alsawareah, Siti Sarah Maidin, Belal Hawashin, Iqbal Jebril, Belal Zaqaibeh, Haneen A. Al-khawaja","doi":"10.4018/ijcac.339563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification of ambiguities in Arabic requirement documents plays a crucial role in requirements engineering. This is because the quality of requirements directly impacts the overall success of software development projects. Traditionally, engineers have used manual methods to evaluate requirement quality, leading to a time-consuming and subjective process that is prone to errors. This study explores the use of machine learning algorithms to automate the assessment of requirements expressed in natural language. The study aims to compare various machine learning algorithms according to their abilities in classifying requirements written in Arabic as decision tree. The findings reveal that random forest outperformed all stemmers, achieving an accuracy of 0.95 without employing a stemmer, 0.99 with the ISRI stemmer, and 0.97 with the Arabic light stemmer. These results highlight the robustness and practicality of the random forest algorithm.","PeriodicalId":51857,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting Ambiguities in Requirement Documents Written in Arabic Using Machine Learning Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Althunibat, Bayan Alsawareah, Siti Sarah Maidin, Belal Hawashin, Iqbal Jebril, Belal Zaqaibeh, Haneen A. Al-khawaja\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijcac.339563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The identification of ambiguities in Arabic requirement documents plays a crucial role in requirements engineering. This is because the quality of requirements directly impacts the overall success of software development projects. Traditionally, engineers have used manual methods to evaluate requirement quality, leading to a time-consuming and subjective process that is prone to errors. This study explores the use of machine learning algorithms to automate the assessment of requirements expressed in natural language. The study aims to compare various machine learning algorithms according to their abilities in classifying requirements written in Arabic as decision tree. The findings reveal that random forest outperformed all stemmers, achieving an accuracy of 0.95 without employing a stemmer, 0.99 with the ISRI stemmer, and 0.97 with the Arabic light stemmer. These results highlight the robustness and practicality of the random forest algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.339563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.339563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别阿拉伯语需求文档中的歧义在需求工程中起着至关重要的作用。这是因为需求的质量直接影响到软件开发项目的整体成败。传统上,工程师们使用人工方法来评估需求质量,导致过程耗时且主观,容易出错。本研究探索使用机器学习算法来自动评估以自然语言表达的需求。研究旨在比较各种机器学习算法在将阿拉伯语需求分类为决策树方面的能力。研究结果表明,随机森林的表现优于所有干词识别器,在不使用干词识别器的情况下,准确率达到 0.95;使用 ISRI 干词识别器时,准确率达到 0.99;使用阿拉伯语轻型干词识别器时,准确率达到 0.97。这些结果凸显了随机森林算法的稳健性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting Ambiguities in Requirement Documents Written in Arabic Using Machine Learning Algorithms
The identification of ambiguities in Arabic requirement documents plays a crucial role in requirements engineering. This is because the quality of requirements directly impacts the overall success of software development projects. Traditionally, engineers have used manual methods to evaluate requirement quality, leading to a time-consuming and subjective process that is prone to errors. This study explores the use of machine learning algorithms to automate the assessment of requirements expressed in natural language. The study aims to compare various machine learning algorithms according to their abilities in classifying requirements written in Arabic as decision tree. The findings reveal that random forest outperformed all stemmers, achieving an accuracy of 0.95 without employing a stemmer, 0.99 with the ISRI stemmer, and 0.97 with the Arabic light stemmer. These results highlight the robustness and practicality of the random forest algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing
International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信