成都市儿科急诊分诊标准的结果:198628份儿科病历的回顾性研究。

Jing Zhao, Yingying Zhao, Juan Hu, Yan Huang, Liqin He
{"title":"成都市儿科急诊分诊标准的结果:198628份儿科病历的回顾性研究。","authors":"Jing Zhao, Yingying Zhao, Juan Hu, Yan Huang, Liqin He","doi":"10.12659/msm.942814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria were developed at our hospital and consist of 4 triage levels: immediate treatment (level 1), treatment within 10 min (level 2), treatment within 30 min (level 3), and treatment within 240 min (level 4). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes from the levels 1 to 4 of this triage criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS A self-designed survey form was used to collect pediatric Emergency Department (ED) patients' general data, including age, sex, and chief concern, and clinical data, including triage level, whether the patient had died, and whether the patient was admitted to our hospital. A total of 198,628 patient records that were triaged during January to May 2022 using Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria were included in this retrospective study. The numbers of patients triaged to levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 128, 1164, 14,560, and 182,776, respectively. RESULTS Statistically significant differences were found in waiting time for treatment, hospital admission rates, admission conversion rates, and case mix index at admission under different triage levels. The higher the triage priority level, the shorter the waiting time for ED treatment, higher the hospital admission and admission conversion rates, and higher case mix index value. CONCLUSIONS The Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria developed and applied within our hospital appears to be characterized by good clinical validity. Equipped with this triage criteria, triage nurses are more capable of determining the severity and emergency of the pediatric ED patients' health conditions and effectively triaging the patients.","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"54 9","pages":"e942814"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Chengdu Pediatric Emergency Triage Criteria: A Retrospective Study of 198,628 Pediatric Patient Records.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Zhao, Yingying Zhao, Juan Hu, Yan Huang, Liqin He\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/msm.942814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND The Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria were developed at our hospital and consist of 4 triage levels: immediate treatment (level 1), treatment within 10 min (level 2), treatment within 30 min (level 3), and treatment within 240 min (level 4). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes from the levels 1 to 4 of this triage criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS A self-designed survey form was used to collect pediatric Emergency Department (ED) patients' general data, including age, sex, and chief concern, and clinical data, including triage level, whether the patient had died, and whether the patient was admitted to our hospital. A total of 198,628 patient records that were triaged during January to May 2022 using Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria were included in this retrospective study. The numbers of patients triaged to levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 128, 1164, 14,560, and 182,776, respectively. RESULTS Statistically significant differences were found in waiting time for treatment, hospital admission rates, admission conversion rates, and case mix index at admission under different triage levels. The higher the triage priority level, the shorter the waiting time for ED treatment, higher the hospital admission and admission conversion rates, and higher case mix index value. CONCLUSIONS The Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria developed and applied within our hospital appears to be characterized by good clinical validity. Equipped with this triage criteria, triage nurses are more capable of determining the severity and emergency of the pediatric ED patients' health conditions and effectively triaging the patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"54 9\",\"pages\":\"e942814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.942814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.942814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 我院制定了成都市儿科急诊分诊标准,包括 4 个分诊级别:立即治疗(1 级)、10 分钟内治疗(2 级)、30 分钟内治疗(3 级)和 240 分钟内治疗(4 级)。本研究旨在评估该分流标准中 1 至 4 级的治疗效果。材料与方法 采用自行设计的调查表收集儿科急诊室(ED)患者的一般数据,包括年龄、性别和主要问题,以及临床数据,包括分流级别、患者是否死亡、是否入住本院。这项回顾性研究共纳入了2022年1月至5月期间根据成都市儿科急诊分诊标准分诊的198628份病历。被分流到 1、2、3 和 4 级的患者人数分别为 128、1164、14560 和 182776 人。结果 在不同分流级别下,患者的候诊时间、入院率、入院转换率和入院时的病例组合指数都存在明显的统计学差异。分流优先级别越高,ED 治疗等待时间越短,入院率和入院转换率越高,病例组合指数值越高。结论 我院制定并应用的成都市儿科急诊分诊标准具有良好的临床有效性。有了这一分流标准,分流护士更有能力判断儿科急诊患者健康状况的严重程度和紧急程度,并有效地对患者进行分流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Chengdu Pediatric Emergency Triage Criteria: A Retrospective Study of 198,628 Pediatric Patient Records.
BACKGROUND The Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria were developed at our hospital and consist of 4 triage levels: immediate treatment (level 1), treatment within 10 min (level 2), treatment within 30 min (level 3), and treatment within 240 min (level 4). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes from the levels 1 to 4 of this triage criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS A self-designed survey form was used to collect pediatric Emergency Department (ED) patients' general data, including age, sex, and chief concern, and clinical data, including triage level, whether the patient had died, and whether the patient was admitted to our hospital. A total of 198,628 patient records that were triaged during January to May 2022 using Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria were included in this retrospective study. The numbers of patients triaged to levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 128, 1164, 14,560, and 182,776, respectively. RESULTS Statistically significant differences were found in waiting time for treatment, hospital admission rates, admission conversion rates, and case mix index at admission under different triage levels. The higher the triage priority level, the shorter the waiting time for ED treatment, higher the hospital admission and admission conversion rates, and higher case mix index value. CONCLUSIONS The Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria developed and applied within our hospital appears to be characterized by good clinical validity. Equipped with this triage criteria, triage nurses are more capable of determining the severity and emergency of the pediatric ED patients' health conditions and effectively triaging the patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信