评估未参保患者诊所的阿片类药物过量风险和应对准备情况

Benjamin Wrucke, Stephen Stevanovic, Naisarg Vanani, Ryan Klauck, Bryan Johnston
{"title":"评估未参保患者诊所的阿片类药物过量风险和应对准备情况","authors":"Benjamin Wrucke, Stephen Stevanovic, Naisarg Vanani, Ryan Klauck, Bryan Johnston","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The opioid epidemic has been worsening. Fortunately, studies show that bystanders can effectively administer naloxone to reverse opioid overdose, and overdose education programs result in improved ability to respond to overdose. However, there has been limited research investigating opioid overdose risk and response preparedness among patients without insurance. This descriptive report aimed to assess risk of opioid overdose among patients without insurance in addition to their family members and close contacts and assess whether these patients, as crucial bystanders, were prepared to respond to opioid overdose. \nMethods: Patients without insurance at a student-run free clinic completed an anonymous, voluntary survey during in-person appointments. Data were collected for eight months from 2021-2022. One-proportion Z-test compared respondent rates of opioid use with overall statewide community rates reported by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) Opioid Dashboard. Subgroup analysis further described the data collected, and hypothetical number needed to screen (NNS) calculations explored possible screening methods for naloxone distribution. \nResults: Seventy-two patients responded to the survey. The past-year rate of medically prescribed opioid use in the study population (12.5%) did not differ from the rate statewide (15.8%; p=0.44). Zero respondents reported personal opioid overdose in the past year, but six overdoses had been witnessed. Among respondents with family or close contacts who use opioids, 50% of those respondents who do not carry naloxone do not know where to get it, but 75% of those respondents who are not trained on how to respond to overdose would like to be. Lastly, screening for family or close contact opioid use offered the lowest hypothetical NNS of screening methods considered. \nConclusions: Patients without insurance at student-run free clinics, including those with family members or close contacts who use opioids, likely represent a target population for opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Opioid Overdose Risk and Response Readiness Among Patients at a Clinic for Uninsured Patients\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Wrucke, Stephen Stevanovic, Naisarg Vanani, Ryan Klauck, Bryan Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The opioid epidemic has been worsening. Fortunately, studies show that bystanders can effectively administer naloxone to reverse opioid overdose, and overdose education programs result in improved ability to respond to overdose. However, there has been limited research investigating opioid overdose risk and response preparedness among patients without insurance. This descriptive report aimed to assess risk of opioid overdose among patients without insurance in addition to their family members and close contacts and assess whether these patients, as crucial bystanders, were prepared to respond to opioid overdose. \\nMethods: Patients without insurance at a student-run free clinic completed an anonymous, voluntary survey during in-person appointments. Data were collected for eight months from 2021-2022. One-proportion Z-test compared respondent rates of opioid use with overall statewide community rates reported by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) Opioid Dashboard. Subgroup analysis further described the data collected, and hypothetical number needed to screen (NNS) calculations explored possible screening methods for naloxone distribution. \\nResults: Seventy-two patients responded to the survey. The past-year rate of medically prescribed opioid use in the study population (12.5%) did not differ from the rate statewide (15.8%; p=0.44). Zero respondents reported personal opioid overdose in the past year, but six overdoses had been witnessed. Among respondents with family or close contacts who use opioids, 50% of those respondents who do not carry naloxone do not know where to get it, but 75% of those respondents who are not trained on how to respond to overdose would like to be. Lastly, screening for family or close contact opioid use offered the lowest hypothetical NNS of screening methods considered. \\nConclusions: Patients without insurance at student-run free clinics, including those with family members or close contacts who use opioids, likely represent a target population for opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of student-run clinics\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of student-run clinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物疫情不断恶化。幸运的是,研究表明,旁观者可以有效施用纳洛酮来逆转阿片类药物过量,而药物过量教育计划也提高了应对药物过量的能力。然而,针对无保险患者的阿片类药物过量风险和应对准备的研究却十分有限。这份描述性报告旨在评估无保险患者及其家庭成员和密切接触者的阿片类药物过量风险,并评估这些患者作为重要的旁观者是否做好了应对阿片类药物过量的准备。方法:在一家学生经营的免费诊所就诊的无保险患者在就诊期间填写了一份匿名自愿调查问卷。数据收集时间为 2021-2022 年的 8 个月。将受访者的阿片类药物使用率与威斯康星州卫生服务部(DHS)阿片类药物仪表板报告的全州社区总体使用率进行了单比例 Z 检验比较。分组分析进一步说明了所收集的数据,假设筛查所需人数(NNS)计算探讨了纳洛酮分发的可能筛查方法。结果:72 名患者对调查做出了回复。研究人群过去一年的阿片类药物处方使用率(12.5%)与全州的使用率(15.8%;P=0.44)没有差异。没有受访者报告自己在过去一年中服用阿片类药物过量,但有六人目睹过过量服用阿片类药物。在有家人或密切接触者使用阿片类药物的受访者中,50% 没有携带纳洛酮的受访者不知道从哪里获取纳洛酮,但 75% 没有接受过如何应对用药过量培训的受访者希望接受培训。最后,在所考虑的筛查方法中,对家人或亲密接触者使用阿片类药物情况的筛查所提供的假定 NNS 最低。结论在学生开办的免费诊所就诊的无保险患者,包括有家庭成员或密切接触者使用阿片类药物的患者,很可能是阿片类药物过量教育和纳洛酮发放的目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Opioid Overdose Risk and Response Readiness Among Patients at a Clinic for Uninsured Patients
Background: The opioid epidemic has been worsening. Fortunately, studies show that bystanders can effectively administer naloxone to reverse opioid overdose, and overdose education programs result in improved ability to respond to overdose. However, there has been limited research investigating opioid overdose risk and response preparedness among patients without insurance. This descriptive report aimed to assess risk of opioid overdose among patients without insurance in addition to their family members and close contacts and assess whether these patients, as crucial bystanders, were prepared to respond to opioid overdose. Methods: Patients without insurance at a student-run free clinic completed an anonymous, voluntary survey during in-person appointments. Data were collected for eight months from 2021-2022. One-proportion Z-test compared respondent rates of opioid use with overall statewide community rates reported by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) Opioid Dashboard. Subgroup analysis further described the data collected, and hypothetical number needed to screen (NNS) calculations explored possible screening methods for naloxone distribution. Results: Seventy-two patients responded to the survey. The past-year rate of medically prescribed opioid use in the study population (12.5%) did not differ from the rate statewide (15.8%; p=0.44). Zero respondents reported personal opioid overdose in the past year, but six overdoses had been witnessed. Among respondents with family or close contacts who use opioids, 50% of those respondents who do not carry naloxone do not know where to get it, but 75% of those respondents who are not trained on how to respond to overdose would like to be. Lastly, screening for family or close contact opioid use offered the lowest hypothetical NNS of screening methods considered. Conclusions: Patients without insurance at student-run free clinics, including those with family members or close contacts who use opioids, likely represent a target population for opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信