E. Apino, Heri Retnawati, W. Purbani, Kana Hidayati
{"title":"数学教育专业学生的统计素养:关于理解误差范围的调查","authors":"E. Apino, Heri Retnawati, W. Purbani, Kana Hidayati","doi":"10.18421/tem131-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the margin of error (MoE) as a part of statistical literacy which is useful for the public to select credible information from various surveys and polls. The study aims to reveal the levels of statistical literacy of mathematics education students, especially in understanding MoE, and compare them based on four variables: gender, enrollment in a statistics course, year in the program, and type of university. The online survey research involved undergraduate students of the mathematics education study program from 21 universities in Indonesia’s western, central, and eastern regions as the sample (n = 970). Descriptive statistics was used to describe the literacy levels and inferential statistics (t-test and F-test) to compare them based on the four variables. The results of the study reveal that: (1) student literacy in understanding the MoE concept is dominant at the non-literate level; and (2) there are significant differences in students’ literacy levels in terms of gender, enrollment in a statistics course, year in the program, and type of university. The study indicates that the literacy of mathematics education students is still low, so the statistics course is expected to focus more on developing statistical literacy.","PeriodicalId":515899,"journal":{"name":"TEM Journal","volume":"39 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Statistical Literacy of Mathematics Education Students: An Investigation on Understanding the Margin of Error\",\"authors\":\"E. Apino, Heri Retnawati, W. Purbani, Kana Hidayati\",\"doi\":\"10.18421/tem131-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the margin of error (MoE) as a part of statistical literacy which is useful for the public to select credible information from various surveys and polls. The study aims to reveal the levels of statistical literacy of mathematics education students, especially in understanding MoE, and compare them based on four variables: gender, enrollment in a statistics course, year in the program, and type of university. The online survey research involved undergraduate students of the mathematics education study program from 21 universities in Indonesia’s western, central, and eastern regions as the sample (n = 970). Descriptive statistics was used to describe the literacy levels and inferential statistics (t-test and F-test) to compare them based on the four variables. The results of the study reveal that: (1) student literacy in understanding the MoE concept is dominant at the non-literate level; and (2) there are significant differences in students’ literacy levels in terms of gender, enrollment in a statistics course, year in the program, and type of university. The study indicates that the literacy of mathematics education students is still low, so the statistics course is expected to focus more on developing statistical literacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEM Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEM Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18421/tem131-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEM Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18421/tem131-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
了解误差范围(MoE)是统计素养的一部分,有助于公众从各种调查和民意测验中选择可信的信息。本研究旨在揭示数学教育专业学生的统计素养水平,尤其是在理解误差范围方面,并根据四个变量对学生进行比较:性别、统计课程的注册情况、专业年级和大学类型。在线调查研究以印度尼西亚西部、中部和东部地区 21 所大学的数学教育专业本科生为样本(n = 970)。研究使用描述性统计来描述学生的数学素养水平,并根据四个变量使用推断性统计(t 检验和 F 检验)对学生的数学素养水平进行比较。研究结果表明(1) 学生在理解数学教育概念方面的素养在非素养水平上占主导地位;(2) 学生的素养水平在性别、统计课程注册情况、课程年级和大学类型方面存在显著差异。研究表明,数学教育专业学生的统计素养仍然较低,因此希望统计课程更加注重培养学生的统计素养。
The Statistical Literacy of Mathematics Education Students: An Investigation on Understanding the Margin of Error
Understanding the margin of error (MoE) as a part of statistical literacy which is useful for the public to select credible information from various surveys and polls. The study aims to reveal the levels of statistical literacy of mathematics education students, especially in understanding MoE, and compare them based on four variables: gender, enrollment in a statistics course, year in the program, and type of university. The online survey research involved undergraduate students of the mathematics education study program from 21 universities in Indonesia’s western, central, and eastern regions as the sample (n = 970). Descriptive statistics was used to describe the literacy levels and inferential statistics (t-test and F-test) to compare them based on the four variables. The results of the study reveal that: (1) student literacy in understanding the MoE concept is dominant at the non-literate level; and (2) there are significant differences in students’ literacy levels in terms of gender, enrollment in a statistics course, year in the program, and type of university. The study indicates that the literacy of mathematics education students is still low, so the statistics course is expected to focus more on developing statistical literacy.