美国治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物支付政策:前景与机遇

Emma E. McGinty, Sarah A. White, Matthew D Eisenberg, Nicole Palmer, C. H. Brown, Brendan K Saloner
{"title":"美国治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物支付政策:前景与机遇","authors":"Emma E. McGinty, Sarah A. White, Matthew D Eisenberg, Nicole Palmer, C. H. Brown, Brendan K Saloner","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Offering patients medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD), but an estimated 75-90% of people with OUD who could benefit from MOUD do not receive medication. Payment policy, defined as public and private payers’ approaches to covering and reimbursing providers for MOUD, is one contributor to this treatment gap. We conducted a policy analysis and qualitative interviews (N=21) and surveys (N=31) with U.S. MOUD payment policy experts to characterize MOUD insurance coverage across major categories of U.S. insurers and identify opportunities for reform and innovation. Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid all provide coverage for at least one formulation of buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone for OUD. Private insurance coverage varies by carrier and by plan, with methadone most likely to be excluded. The experts interviewed cautioned against rigid reimbursement models that force patients into one-size-fits-all care and endorsed future development and adoption of value-based MOUD payment models. More than 70% of experts surveyed reported that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers should increase payment for office- and opioid treatment program-based MOUD. Validation of MOUD performance metrics is needed to support future value-based initiatives.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"59 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. payment policy for medications to treat opioid use disorder: landscape and opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Emma E. McGinty, Sarah A. White, Matthew D Eisenberg, Nicole Palmer, C. H. Brown, Brendan K Saloner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Offering patients medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD), but an estimated 75-90% of people with OUD who could benefit from MOUD do not receive medication. Payment policy, defined as public and private payers’ approaches to covering and reimbursing providers for MOUD, is one contributor to this treatment gap. We conducted a policy analysis and qualitative interviews (N=21) and surveys (N=31) with U.S. MOUD payment policy experts to characterize MOUD insurance coverage across major categories of U.S. insurers and identify opportunities for reform and innovation. Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid all provide coverage for at least one formulation of buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone for OUD. Private insurance coverage varies by carrier and by plan, with methadone most likely to be excluded. The experts interviewed cautioned against rigid reimbursement models that force patients into one-size-fits-all care and endorsed future development and adoption of value-based MOUD payment models. More than 70% of experts surveyed reported that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers should increase payment for office- and opioid treatment program-based MOUD. Validation of MOUD performance metrics is needed to support future value-based initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"volume\":\"59 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为患者提供治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的标准方法,但估计有 75%-90% 的 OUD 患者无法从 MOUD 中获益。支付政策(即公共和私人支付方对 MOUD 的承保和报销方法)是造成这种治疗差距的原因之一。我们进行了一项政策分析,并对美国 MOUD 支付政策专家进行了定性访谈(21 人)和调查(31 人),以了解美国主要类别保险公司的 MOUD 保险覆盖情况,并确定改革和创新的机会。传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势和医疗补助都提供至少一种丁丙诺啡、纳曲酮和美沙酮配方的治疗 OUD 的保险。私人保险的承保范围因承保人和保险计划而异,美沙酮最有可能被排除在外。受访专家告诫不要采用僵化的报销模式,迫使患者接受 "一刀切 "的治疗,并赞同未来开发和采用以价值为基础的 MOUD 支付模式。超过 70% 的受访专家表示,医疗保险、医疗补助和私人保险公司应增加对基于诊室和阿片类药物治疗项目的 MOUD 的支付。需要对 MOUD 的绩效指标进行验证,以支持未来基于价值的倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
U.S. payment policy for medications to treat opioid use disorder: landscape and opportunities
Offering patients medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD), but an estimated 75-90% of people with OUD who could benefit from MOUD do not receive medication. Payment policy, defined as public and private payers’ approaches to covering and reimbursing providers for MOUD, is one contributor to this treatment gap. We conducted a policy analysis and qualitative interviews (N=21) and surveys (N=31) with U.S. MOUD payment policy experts to characterize MOUD insurance coverage across major categories of U.S. insurers and identify opportunities for reform and innovation. Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid all provide coverage for at least one formulation of buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone for OUD. Private insurance coverage varies by carrier and by plan, with methadone most likely to be excluded. The experts interviewed cautioned against rigid reimbursement models that force patients into one-size-fits-all care and endorsed future development and adoption of value-based MOUD payment models. More than 70% of experts surveyed reported that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers should increase payment for office- and opioid treatment program-based MOUD. Validation of MOUD performance metrics is needed to support future value-based initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信