{"title":"直接驱动还是滑块曲柄?比较马达驱动的拍翼微型飞行器","authors":"Moonsoo Park, Ali Abolfathi","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2023-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles, the common approach to converting the rotational motion of a DC motor to the reciprocal flapping motion is using a slider-crank mechanism. However, frictional losses in sliders and rotational joints can hinder the performance of such a system. An alternative is a direct drive system where the wings are directly connected to a DC motor which has been driven by an AC signal. These two approaches are compared in this paper, to evaluate their performances and assess which one provides a better solution for flapping wing micro drones. The electromechanical model of the two systems is used in this paper to compare their performances. System parameters for both types of drones were derived through a multi-variable optimisation process using the same DC motor. The comparisons are made in terms of input power requirement, aerodynamic power, system efficiency and lift. The direct drive model can generate about 16 % higher average lift at 5 V with 50 % lower input electrical power. It has 29 % larger aerodynamic power and the system efficiency is 16.0 % higher than that of the slider-crank model.","PeriodicalId":202289,"journal":{"name":"Drone Systems and Applications","volume":"52 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct drive or slider-crank? Comparing motor-actuated flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Moonsoo Park, Ali Abolfathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/dsa-2023-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles, the common approach to converting the rotational motion of a DC motor to the reciprocal flapping motion is using a slider-crank mechanism. However, frictional losses in sliders and rotational joints can hinder the performance of such a system. An alternative is a direct drive system where the wings are directly connected to a DC motor which has been driven by an AC signal. These two approaches are compared in this paper, to evaluate their performances and assess which one provides a better solution for flapping wing micro drones. The electromechanical model of the two systems is used in this paper to compare their performances. System parameters for both types of drones were derived through a multi-variable optimisation process using the same DC motor. The comparisons are made in terms of input power requirement, aerodynamic power, system efficiency and lift. The direct drive model can generate about 16 % higher average lift at 5 V with 50 % lower input electrical power. It has 29 % larger aerodynamic power and the system efficiency is 16.0 % higher than that of the slider-crank model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drone Systems and Applications\",\"volume\":\"52 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drone Systems and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drone Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于拍翼式微型飞行器,将直流电机的旋转运动转换为往复拍动运动的常见方法是使用滑块-曲柄机构。然而,滑块和旋转接头的摩擦损耗会阻碍这种系统的性能。另一种方法是直接驱动系统,即机翼直接连接到由交流信号驱动的直流电机上。本文对这两种方法进行了比较,以评估它们的性能,并评估哪种方法能为拍翼式微型无人机提供更好的解决方案。本文使用这两种系统的机电模型来比较它们的性能。两种无人机的系统参数都是通过使用相同的直流电机进行多变量优化过程得出的。比较的内容包括输入功率要求、空气动力功率、系统效率和升力。在 5 V 电压下,直接驱动模型的平均升力高出约 16%,而输入功率却低 50%。它的空气动力功率比滑块曲柄模型大 29%,系统效率比滑块曲柄模型高 16.0%。
Direct drive or slider-crank? Comparing motor-actuated flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles
For flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles, the common approach to converting the rotational motion of a DC motor to the reciprocal flapping motion is using a slider-crank mechanism. However, frictional losses in sliders and rotational joints can hinder the performance of such a system. An alternative is a direct drive system where the wings are directly connected to a DC motor which has been driven by an AC signal. These two approaches are compared in this paper, to evaluate their performances and assess which one provides a better solution for flapping wing micro drones. The electromechanical model of the two systems is used in this paper to compare their performances. System parameters for both types of drones were derived through a multi-variable optimisation process using the same DC motor. The comparisons are made in terms of input power requirement, aerodynamic power, system efficiency and lift. The direct drive model can generate about 16 % higher average lift at 5 V with 50 % lower input electrical power. It has 29 % larger aerodynamic power and the system efficiency is 16.0 % higher than that of the slider-crank model.