评估酸性物质在有效刺激砂岩地层方面的性能

Nyelebuchi Amadichuku, Ugwunna Dickson Amadi, Abu Robin, Ndidi Uzoigwe
{"title":"评估酸性物质在有效刺激砂岩地层方面的性能","authors":"Nyelebuchi Amadichuku, Ugwunna Dickson Amadi, Abu Robin, Ndidi Uzoigwe","doi":"10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimum acid selection based on reservoir condition is one of the key elements in achieving a successful treatment in sandstone matrix acidizing. This work will investigate the effectiveness of several type of acid in sand stone reservoir stimulation. PROSPER well modeling package was utilized for the model development. Pre- acid job analysis was carried out to establish the well performance before acidization. Acid stimulation was implemented with Hydrochloric (HCl), Formic, Acetic, Propionic and ChloroAcetic acids. Thereafter, post-job analysis was done to ascertain the improvement in well productivity index for each of the acids. Result shows that the reservoir will deliver 11296.5 STB/day of liquid into the wellbore for a production index of 3-STB/day-psi without acid stimulation and the well will produce 6726.05 STB/day of liquid. Results reveals a decrease in productivity index as the treatment acid was change from HCl acid to formic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid. A productivity index values of 3.07074STB/day-psi, 3.0375 STB/day-psi, 3.01038 STB/day-psi, 3.00791 STB/day-psi were obtained when the formation was acidized with HCl acid, formic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid. A percentage increase of 15.1973%, 7.5731%, 1.95684% and 1.47001% in permeability was observed as the formation was treated with HCl acid, formic acid, Acetic acid and Propionic acid. Results reveals that HCl acid resulted in highest permeability increase. It was therefore concluded that the formation should be acidized with HCl acid since it gave the highest productivity index, percentage increase in permeability, porosity and the highest improvement in skin factor.","PeriodicalId":275182,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences","volume":"47 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the performance of acids for effective stimulation of a sandstone formation\",\"authors\":\"Nyelebuchi Amadichuku, Ugwunna Dickson Amadi, Abu Robin, Ndidi Uzoigwe\",\"doi\":\"10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optimum acid selection based on reservoir condition is one of the key elements in achieving a successful treatment in sandstone matrix acidizing. This work will investigate the effectiveness of several type of acid in sand stone reservoir stimulation. PROSPER well modeling package was utilized for the model development. Pre- acid job analysis was carried out to establish the well performance before acidization. Acid stimulation was implemented with Hydrochloric (HCl), Formic, Acetic, Propionic and ChloroAcetic acids. Thereafter, post-job analysis was done to ascertain the improvement in well productivity index for each of the acids. Result shows that the reservoir will deliver 11296.5 STB/day of liquid into the wellbore for a production index of 3-STB/day-psi without acid stimulation and the well will produce 6726.05 STB/day of liquid. Results reveals a decrease in productivity index as the treatment acid was change from HCl acid to formic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid. A productivity index values of 3.07074STB/day-psi, 3.0375 STB/day-psi, 3.01038 STB/day-psi, 3.00791 STB/day-psi were obtained when the formation was acidized with HCl acid, formic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid. A percentage increase of 15.1973%, 7.5731%, 1.95684% and 1.47001% in permeability was observed as the formation was treated with HCl acid, formic acid, Acetic acid and Propionic acid. Results reveals that HCl acid resulted in highest permeability increase. It was therefore concluded that the formation should be acidized with HCl acid since it gave the highest productivity index, percentage increase in permeability, porosity and the highest improvement in skin factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences\",\"volume\":\"47 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据储层条件优化酸的选择是砂岩基质酸化处理取得成功的关键因素之一。这项工作将研究几种酸在砂岩储层酸化中的有效性。模型开发使用了 PROSPER 井建模软件包。进行了酸化前作业分析,以确定酸化前的油井性能。使用盐酸 (HCl)、甲酸、乙酸、丙酸和氯乙酸进行酸化。之后,进行了作业后分析,以确定每种酸对油井生产力指数的改善情况。结果显示,在没有酸刺激的情况下,储层的生产指数为 3-STB/day-psi 时,每天将向井筒输送 11296.5 STB 的液体,油井每天将生产 6726.05 STB 的液体。结果显示,当处理酸从盐酸变为甲酸、乙酸和丙酸时,产能指数有所下降。用盐酸、甲酸、乙酸和丙酸酸化地层时,生产指数分别为 3.07074 STB/天-磅/平方英寸、3.0375 STB/天-磅/平方英寸、3.01038 STB/天-磅/平方英寸和 3.00791 STB/天-磅/平方英寸。使用盐酸、甲酸、醋酸和丙酸处理地层时,渗透率分别增加了 15.1973%、7.5731%、1.95684% 和 1.47001%。结果显示,盐酸导致的渗透率增加最高。因此,得出的结论是,地层应使用盐酸进行酸化,因为盐酸的产能指数、渗透率和孔隙度的增加百分比最高,而且表皮因子的改善幅度也最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the performance of acids for effective stimulation of a sandstone formation
Optimum acid selection based on reservoir condition is one of the key elements in achieving a successful treatment in sandstone matrix acidizing. This work will investigate the effectiveness of several type of acid in sand stone reservoir stimulation. PROSPER well modeling package was utilized for the model development. Pre- acid job analysis was carried out to establish the well performance before acidization. Acid stimulation was implemented with Hydrochloric (HCl), Formic, Acetic, Propionic and ChloroAcetic acids. Thereafter, post-job analysis was done to ascertain the improvement in well productivity index for each of the acids. Result shows that the reservoir will deliver 11296.5 STB/day of liquid into the wellbore for a production index of 3-STB/day-psi without acid stimulation and the well will produce 6726.05 STB/day of liquid. Results reveals a decrease in productivity index as the treatment acid was change from HCl acid to formic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid. A productivity index values of 3.07074STB/day-psi, 3.0375 STB/day-psi, 3.01038 STB/day-psi, 3.00791 STB/day-psi were obtained when the formation was acidized with HCl acid, formic acid, acetic acid and propionic acid. A percentage increase of 15.1973%, 7.5731%, 1.95684% and 1.47001% in permeability was observed as the formation was treated with HCl acid, formic acid, Acetic acid and Propionic acid. Results reveals that HCl acid resulted in highest permeability increase. It was therefore concluded that the formation should be acidized with HCl acid since it gave the highest productivity index, percentage increase in permeability, porosity and the highest improvement in skin factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信