{"title":"炎症性肠病的非侵入性工具:生化指标和肠道超声与内窥镜检查的系统回顾和荟萃分析比较","authors":"Sagar Ahammed","doi":"10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite endoscopy's gold standard status, non-invasive tools are revolutionizing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) management. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of biochemical markers, intestinal ultrasound (US), and endoscopy in adults with IBD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and bowel wall thickness measured by US with endoscopy in IBD patients. We searched electronic databases for most recent studies published between 2012 and 2023, identifying 25 studies comparing at least one non-invasive tool with endoscopy. We pooled sensitivity and specificity for relevant outcomes and conducted subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. 25 studies (n=5872 patients) met inclusion criteria. Fecal calprotectin emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool, with pooled sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 85.1% for IBD. But it’s performance was less consistent in differentiating active vs. inactive disease and predicting flares. Intestinal US proved reliable for diagnosis, particularly in Crohn's disease (pooled sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 78.9%), and showed promise in assessing activity and predicting treatment response. C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, though less accurate, provided additional information about disease status. Combining calprotectin and US further enhanced prediction accuracy, while decision tree analysis incorporating clinical data and both tools maximized prediction in ulcerative colitis. Non-invasive tools offer invaluable insights for IBD management, complementing and potentially reducing reliance on endoscopy. Standardizing methodologies and developing more specific markers, potentially aided by AI, holds immense potential for personalized, effective IBD care. This evolving landscape paves the way for a future where patients actively participate in their journey, empowered by the growing arsenal of non-invasive tools.","PeriodicalId":23738,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","volume":"214 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive tools for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biochemical markers and intestinal ultrasound compared to endoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Sagar Ahammed\",\"doi\":\"10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite endoscopy's gold standard status, non-invasive tools are revolutionizing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) management. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of biochemical markers, intestinal ultrasound (US), and endoscopy in adults with IBD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and bowel wall thickness measured by US with endoscopy in IBD patients. We searched electronic databases for most recent studies published between 2012 and 2023, identifying 25 studies comparing at least one non-invasive tool with endoscopy. We pooled sensitivity and specificity for relevant outcomes and conducted subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. 25 studies (n=5872 patients) met inclusion criteria. Fecal calprotectin emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool, with pooled sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 85.1% for IBD. But it’s performance was less consistent in differentiating active vs. inactive disease and predicting flares. Intestinal US proved reliable for diagnosis, particularly in Crohn's disease (pooled sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 78.9%), and showed promise in assessing activity and predicting treatment response. C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, though less accurate, provided additional information about disease status. Combining calprotectin and US further enhanced prediction accuracy, while decision tree analysis incorporating clinical data and both tools maximized prediction in ulcerative colitis. Non-invasive tools offer invaluable insights for IBD management, complementing and potentially reducing reliance on endoscopy. Standardizing methodologies and developing more specific markers, potentially aided by AI, holds immense potential for personalized, effective IBD care. This evolving landscape paves the way for a future where patients actively participate in their journey, empowered by the growing arsenal of non-invasive tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"214 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管内镜检查是金标准,但无创工具正在彻底改变炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了生化标记物、肠道超声(US)和内镜检查对成人 IBD 患者的诊断准确性。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较用 US 和内窥镜测量 IBD 患者粪便钙蛋白、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和肠壁厚度的诊断准确性。我们检索了电子数据库中 2012 年至 2023 年间发表的最新研究,确定了 25 项比较至少一种无创工具与内镜检查的研究。我们汇总了相关结果的敏感性和特异性,并进行了亚组分析以探讨异质性。25项研究(n=5872名患者)符合纳入标准。粪便钙蛋白是一种强有力的诊断工具,其对 IBD 的集合敏感性为 92.5%,特异性为 85.1%。但它在区分活动性和非活动性疾病以及预测复发方面的表现并不一致。肠道 US 证明诊断可靠,尤其是在克罗恩病中(汇总敏感性为 86.3%,特异性为 78.9%),在评估活动性和预测治疗反应方面也很有前景。C 反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率虽然不太准确,但也提供了有关疾病状态的额外信息。结合钙蛋白和 US 进一步提高了预测的准确性,而结合临床数据和这两种工具的决策树分析则最大限度地提高了对溃疡性结肠炎的预测。无创工具为 IBD 管理提供了宝贵的见解,补充并可能减少对内镜检查的依赖。在人工智能的潜在帮助下,标准化方法和开发更具特异性的标记物为个性化、有效的 IBD 治疗带来了巨大的潜力。这种不断发展的格局为未来铺平了道路,在未来,患者将借助不断增加的非侵入性工具,积极参与他们的治疗过程。
Non-invasive tools for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biochemical markers and intestinal ultrasound compared to endoscopy
Despite endoscopy's gold standard status, non-invasive tools are revolutionizing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) management. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of biochemical markers, intestinal ultrasound (US), and endoscopy in adults with IBD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and bowel wall thickness measured by US with endoscopy in IBD patients. We searched electronic databases for most recent studies published between 2012 and 2023, identifying 25 studies comparing at least one non-invasive tool with endoscopy. We pooled sensitivity and specificity for relevant outcomes and conducted subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. 25 studies (n=5872 patients) met inclusion criteria. Fecal calprotectin emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool, with pooled sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 85.1% for IBD. But it’s performance was less consistent in differentiating active vs. inactive disease and predicting flares. Intestinal US proved reliable for diagnosis, particularly in Crohn's disease (pooled sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 78.9%), and showed promise in assessing activity and predicting treatment response. C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, though less accurate, provided additional information about disease status. Combining calprotectin and US further enhanced prediction accuracy, while decision tree analysis incorporating clinical data and both tools maximized prediction in ulcerative colitis. Non-invasive tools offer invaluable insights for IBD management, complementing and potentially reducing reliance on endoscopy. Standardizing methodologies and developing more specific markers, potentially aided by AI, holds immense potential for personalized, effective IBD care. This evolving landscape paves the way for a future where patients actively participate in their journey, empowered by the growing arsenal of non-invasive tools.