医学生对研究课程的看法:横断面研究

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
A. Bhadoria, Shreya Agarwal, Aprajita Mehta, Rakesh Sharma, Smita Sinha, Mohit Bhatia, Bhavna Gupta, LokeshKumar Saini, Bela Goyal, Shazia Hasan, Gita Negi, Puneet Dhar
{"title":"医学生对研究课程的看法:横断面研究","authors":"A. Bhadoria, Shreya Agarwal, Aprajita Mehta, Rakesh Sharma, Smita Sinha, Mohit Bhatia, Bhavna Gupta, LokeshKumar Saini, Bela Goyal, Shazia Hasan, Gita Negi, Puneet Dhar","doi":"10.47203/ijch.2024.v36i01.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical colleges promote research by incorporating it into the curriculum, which enables students to acknowledge it as a career prospect. The aim of the study was to assess the perceptions of medical students on research curriculum. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 544 medical students (interns and post-graduates) at AIIMS Rishikesh in 2020. Data was collected thorough online self-administered questionnaire. A comparison between groups was made using the Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 544 participants, 218 (40.1%) responded with complete data. The total median score for the self-perceived ability of study participants regarding performing the research tasks differed significantly between interns and post-graduates [29.5 (24.0–34.2) vs 33 (25.2–39.7), p = 0.03]. They suggested that mandatory research projects, workshops, and training should be included in the curriculum. Conclusion: Feedback from medical students regarding the need for guided research projects, hands-on training, and inclusion of research methodology as a course in UG curriculum and provision of support in the form of incentives, academic credits, and motivation are well noted and guide the resource faculties to modify their teaching and student support programs.","PeriodicalId":13363,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Medical Students on Research Curriculum: A Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Bhadoria, Shreya Agarwal, Aprajita Mehta, Rakesh Sharma, Smita Sinha, Mohit Bhatia, Bhavna Gupta, LokeshKumar Saini, Bela Goyal, Shazia Hasan, Gita Negi, Puneet Dhar\",\"doi\":\"10.47203/ijch.2024.v36i01.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Medical colleges promote research by incorporating it into the curriculum, which enables students to acknowledge it as a career prospect. The aim of the study was to assess the perceptions of medical students on research curriculum. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 544 medical students (interns and post-graduates) at AIIMS Rishikesh in 2020. Data was collected thorough online self-administered questionnaire. A comparison between groups was made using the Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 544 participants, 218 (40.1%) responded with complete data. The total median score for the self-perceived ability of study participants regarding performing the research tasks differed significantly between interns and post-graduates [29.5 (24.0–34.2) vs 33 (25.2–39.7), p = 0.03]. They suggested that mandatory research projects, workshops, and training should be included in the curriculum. Conclusion: Feedback from medical students regarding the need for guided research projects, hands-on training, and inclusion of research methodology as a course in UG curriculum and provision of support in the form of incentives, academic credits, and motivation are well noted and guide the resource faculties to modify their teaching and student support programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47203/ijch.2024.v36i01.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47203/ijch.2024.v36i01.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言医学院通过将研究纳入课程来促进研究,从而使学生认识到研究是一种职业前景。本研究旨在评估医科学生对研究课程的看法。研究方法这项横断面研究于 2020 年在 AIIMS Rishikesh 的 544 名医科学生(实习生和研究生)中进行。通过在线自填问卷收集数据。组间比较采用 Mann-Whitney 检验或 chi-square 检验,P < 0.05 为具有统计学意义。结果在 544 名参与者中,有 218 人(40.1%)提供了完整的数据。实习生和研究生在完成研究任务方面的自我认知能力总分中位数差异显著[29.5 (24.0-34.2) vs 33 (25.2-39.7),p = 0.03]。他们建议在课程中加入强制性研究项目、研讨会和培训。结论:医学生对指导性研究项目、实践培训、将研究方法学作为一门课程纳入大学本科课程以及以奖励、学分和激励等形式提供支持的需求的反馈意见得到了很好的关注,并指导资源学院修改其教学和学生支持计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Medical Students on Research Curriculum: A Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: Medical colleges promote research by incorporating it into the curriculum, which enables students to acknowledge it as a career prospect. The aim of the study was to assess the perceptions of medical students on research curriculum. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 544 medical students (interns and post-graduates) at AIIMS Rishikesh in 2020. Data was collected thorough online self-administered questionnaire. A comparison between groups was made using the Mann-Whitney test or chi-square test p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 544 participants, 218 (40.1%) responded with complete data. The total median score for the self-perceived ability of study participants regarding performing the research tasks differed significantly between interns and post-graduates [29.5 (24.0–34.2) vs 33 (25.2–39.7), p = 0.03]. They suggested that mandatory research projects, workshops, and training should be included in the curriculum. Conclusion: Feedback from medical students regarding the need for guided research projects, hands-on training, and inclusion of research methodology as a course in UG curriculum and provision of support in the form of incentives, academic credits, and motivation are well noted and guide the resource faculties to modify their teaching and student support programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Community Health
Indian Journal of Community Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信