论现代文学的创作演变:阅读奥斯特利茨

Hui-sok Yoo
{"title":"论现代文学的创作演变:阅读奥斯特利茨","authors":"Hui-sok Yoo","doi":"10.19116/theory.2024.29.1.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an analytic exploration of W. G. Sebald’s only full-length novel, Austerlitz; a reading to faithfully follow the narrative aspect that goes against the grain of Holocaust testimonial literature. If Sebald has gone beyond testimony to the point of interrogating the Western colonial modernity, then the perusal of Austerlitz must be a great challenge. The narrative, centered around the first-person speaker believed to be Sebald with his attendant eponymous character, Austerlitz, relentlessly reinforces the awareness that the Holocaust is a phenomenon that originated from the Western spirit rooted in the Descartean rationalism. Thus Austerlitz can be re-evaluated as a critique of the fundamental logic of Western modernity and also an attempt to heal its disastrous aftermath. In this vein, Austerlitz is remarkably suffused with architectural meditations; the highly concentrated thoughts on various monumental buildings in countries that once ruled as colonial empires, such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and France, lead to criticism of the origin of Auschwitz. Hence the analysis is focused on the world-view of the Western colonial modernity that perpetrated ‘the Shoah’ in an unprecedented and unparalleled enormity. The upshot of this paper; the narrative of Austerlitz with his first-person narrator remains an outstanding example of the creative evolution in the field of modern literature today.","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"20 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Creative Evolution of Modern Literature:Reading Austerlitz\",\"authors\":\"Hui-sok Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.19116/theory.2024.29.1.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is an analytic exploration of W. G. Sebald’s only full-length novel, Austerlitz; a reading to faithfully follow the narrative aspect that goes against the grain of Holocaust testimonial literature. If Sebald has gone beyond testimony to the point of interrogating the Western colonial modernity, then the perusal of Austerlitz must be a great challenge. The narrative, centered around the first-person speaker believed to be Sebald with his attendant eponymous character, Austerlitz, relentlessly reinforces the awareness that the Holocaust is a phenomenon that originated from the Western spirit rooted in the Descartean rationalism. Thus Austerlitz can be re-evaluated as a critique of the fundamental logic of Western modernity and also an attempt to heal its disastrous aftermath. In this vein, Austerlitz is remarkably suffused with architectural meditations; the highly concentrated thoughts on various monumental buildings in countries that once ruled as colonial empires, such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and France, lead to criticism of the origin of Auschwitz. Hence the analysis is focused on the world-view of the Western colonial modernity that perpetrated ‘the Shoah’ in an unprecedented and unparalleled enormity. The upshot of this paper; the narrative of Austerlitz with his first-person narrator remains an outstanding example of the creative evolution in the field of modern literature today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea\",\"volume\":\"20 40\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2024.29.1.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2024.29.1.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对塞巴尔德(W. G. Sebald)唯一一部长篇小说《奥斯特利茨》(Austerlitz)的分析性探讨;是对违背大屠杀见证文学规律的叙事方面的忠实解读。如果说塞巴尔德已经超越了见证的范畴,达到了拷问西方殖民现代性的地步,那么阅读《奥斯特利茨》一定是一个巨大的挑战。小说以第一人称塞巴尔德及其同名人物奥斯特利茨为中心展开叙述,无情地强化了这样一种意识,即大屠杀是源于笛卡尔理性主义的西方精神的一种现象。因此,可以将《奥斯特利茨》重新评价为对西方现代性基本逻辑的批判,同时也是医治其灾难性后果的尝试。在这一思路下,《奥斯特利茨》明显充满了建筑冥想;对荷兰、英国和法国等曾经作为殖民帝国统治的国家的各种纪念性建筑的高度集中思考,引发了对奥斯威辛起源的批判。因此,本文分析的重点是西方殖民现代性的世界观,它以前所未有的巨大规模制造了 "浩劫"。本文的结论是:《奥斯特利茨》的叙事及其第一人称叙述者仍然是当今现代文学领域创造性演变的杰出典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Creative Evolution of Modern Literature:Reading Austerlitz
This paper is an analytic exploration of W. G. Sebald’s only full-length novel, Austerlitz; a reading to faithfully follow the narrative aspect that goes against the grain of Holocaust testimonial literature. If Sebald has gone beyond testimony to the point of interrogating the Western colonial modernity, then the perusal of Austerlitz must be a great challenge. The narrative, centered around the first-person speaker believed to be Sebald with his attendant eponymous character, Austerlitz, relentlessly reinforces the awareness that the Holocaust is a phenomenon that originated from the Western spirit rooted in the Descartean rationalism. Thus Austerlitz can be re-evaluated as a critique of the fundamental logic of Western modernity and also an attempt to heal its disastrous aftermath. In this vein, Austerlitz is remarkably suffused with architectural meditations; the highly concentrated thoughts on various monumental buildings in countries that once ruled as colonial empires, such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and France, lead to criticism of the origin of Auschwitz. Hence the analysis is focused on the world-view of the Western colonial modernity that perpetrated ‘the Shoah’ in an unprecedented and unparalleled enormity. The upshot of this paper; the narrative of Austerlitz with his first-person narrator remains an outstanding example of the creative evolution in the field of modern literature today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信