病例报告:18F]FET PET 在鉴别诊断放射性坏死和转移进展中的贡献--动态采集的可重复性和优越性

Aurélien Callaud, Anne-Claire Dupont, Marie-Agnes By, I. Zemmoura, M. Santiago-Ribeiro
{"title":"病例报告:18F]FET PET 在鉴别诊断放射性坏死和转移进展中的贡献--动态采集的可重复性和优越性","authors":"Aurélien Callaud, Anne-Claire Dupont, Marie-Agnes By, I. Zemmoura, M. Santiago-Ribeiro","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2024.1287240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the case of a 67-year-old woman with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast, in whom a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, 3 months after encephalic radiotherapy, revealed a significant increase in the size of two brain metastases, potentially indicating progressive disease within the radiation field. Subsequent [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) and [18F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([18F]FET PET) scans were performed to distinguish radionecrosis from tumor progression. Despite a dynamic [18F]FET time–activity curve (TAC) against progression, the exceeding of the 1.9 cutoff by mean tumor to brain ratio (TBR) and interdisciplinary considerations led to the resection of one lesion. Histopathology revealed necrosis due to radiotherapy, without viable tumor proliferation. To verify radionecrosis, a second [18F]FET PET scan was conducted, showing consistent findings. In metastasis differentiation, the mean TBR cutoff of 1.9 and TAC analysis achieved a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 91%. The discrepancy between the TAC and TBR emphasizes the need for consideration, and a time delay between radiotherapy and PET may impact TBR cutoffs. In addition, differences in radiosensitivity suggest a lower metastasis pre-test probability of progression, and it might be why a TAC analysis could be more effective in distinguishing true progression from treatment related changes in metastasis. This case demonstrates the accuracy of dynamic [18F]FET PET and suggests its utility for post-treatment metastasis evaluation, and further research on post-treatment delay could lead to improved performances of dynamic [18F]FET PET.","PeriodicalId":505895,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Report: Contribution of [18F]FET PET in differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression in metastasis—reproducibility and superiority of dynamic acquisitions\",\"authors\":\"Aurélien Callaud, Anne-Claire Dupont, Marie-Agnes By, I. Zemmoura, M. Santiago-Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnume.2024.1287240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present the case of a 67-year-old woman with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast, in whom a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, 3 months after encephalic radiotherapy, revealed a significant increase in the size of two brain metastases, potentially indicating progressive disease within the radiation field. Subsequent [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) and [18F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([18F]FET PET) scans were performed to distinguish radionecrosis from tumor progression. Despite a dynamic [18F]FET time–activity curve (TAC) against progression, the exceeding of the 1.9 cutoff by mean tumor to brain ratio (TBR) and interdisciplinary considerations led to the resection of one lesion. Histopathology revealed necrosis due to radiotherapy, without viable tumor proliferation. To verify radionecrosis, a second [18F]FET PET scan was conducted, showing consistent findings. In metastasis differentiation, the mean TBR cutoff of 1.9 and TAC analysis achieved a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 91%. The discrepancy between the TAC and TBR emphasizes the need for consideration, and a time delay between radiotherapy and PET may impact TBR cutoffs. In addition, differences in radiosensitivity suggest a lower metastasis pre-test probability of progression, and it might be why a TAC analysis could be more effective in distinguishing true progression from treatment related changes in metastasis. This case demonstrates the accuracy of dynamic [18F]FET PET and suggests its utility for post-treatment metastasis evaluation, and further research on post-treatment delay could lead to improved performances of dynamic [18F]FET PET.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1287240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1287240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了一例 67 岁的左侧乳腺浸润性导管癌转移性女性患者的病例,她在接受脑部放疗 3 个月后进行了磁共振成像随访,发现两个脑转移灶的体积明显增大,这可能表明放射野内的疾病正在进展。随后进行了[18F] 氟脱氧葡萄糖([18F]FDG)和[18F] 氟乙基-L-酪氨酸正电子发射断层扫描([18F]FET PET),以区分放射性坏死和肿瘤进展。尽管[18F]FET时间活动曲线(TAC)与肿瘤进展呈动态对比,但由于肿瘤与脑的平均比值(TBR)超过了1.9的临界值,再加上多学科的考虑,最终切除了一个病灶。组织病理学检查显示,肿瘤因放疗而坏死,但没有增生。为验证放射性坏死,进行了第二次[18F]FET PET 扫描,结果显示一致。在转移瘤分化中,TBR 的平均临界值为 1.9,TAC 分析的灵敏度为 95%,特异性为 91%。TAC 和 TBR 之间的差异强调了考虑的必要性,放疗和 PET 之间的时间延迟可能会影响 TBR 临界值。此外,放射敏感性的差异表明转移灶检测前的进展概率较低,这可能也是为什么 TAC 分析能更有效地区分真正的进展和与治疗相关的转移灶变化的原因。本病例证明了动态[18F]FET PET的准确性,并提示其在治疗后转移评估中的实用性,对治疗后延迟的进一步研究可能会提高动态[18F]FET PET的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case Report: Contribution of [18F]FET PET in differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression in metastasis—reproducibility and superiority of dynamic acquisitions
We present the case of a 67-year-old woman with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast, in whom a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, 3 months after encephalic radiotherapy, revealed a significant increase in the size of two brain metastases, potentially indicating progressive disease within the radiation field. Subsequent [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) and [18F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([18F]FET PET) scans were performed to distinguish radionecrosis from tumor progression. Despite a dynamic [18F]FET time–activity curve (TAC) against progression, the exceeding of the 1.9 cutoff by mean tumor to brain ratio (TBR) and interdisciplinary considerations led to the resection of one lesion. Histopathology revealed necrosis due to radiotherapy, without viable tumor proliferation. To verify radionecrosis, a second [18F]FET PET scan was conducted, showing consistent findings. In metastasis differentiation, the mean TBR cutoff of 1.9 and TAC analysis achieved a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 91%. The discrepancy between the TAC and TBR emphasizes the need for consideration, and a time delay between radiotherapy and PET may impact TBR cutoffs. In addition, differences in radiosensitivity suggest a lower metastasis pre-test probability of progression, and it might be why a TAC analysis could be more effective in distinguishing true progression from treatment related changes in metastasis. This case demonstrates the accuracy of dynamic [18F]FET PET and suggests its utility for post-treatment metastasis evaluation, and further research on post-treatment delay could lead to improved performances of dynamic [18F]FET PET.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信