{"title":"改变病情疗法在多发性硬化症老年人中的实际效果","authors":"Oisín Butler , Bianca Weinstock-Guttman , Dejan Jakimovski , Svetlana Eckert , Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik , Simone Heeg , Markus Schürks","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can alter multiple sclerosis (MS) disease course.</p><p>Peak prevalence age for people with MS (pwMS) has increased, but little is known about MS clinical course or DMT response in older pwMS.</p><p>The objective of this retrospective analysis of a US administrative claims database to was to evaluate MS disease course, DMT use, healthcare utilisation, and time to relapse during follow-up, in pwMS ≥50 years with active disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Inclusion criteria were ≥3 years’ continuous enrolment, ≥1 MS relapse (index event), and age ≥50 years. Baseline period was 1 year prior to index event. Follow-up was 2 years.</p><p>Two patient categories were considered: (i) not under DMT treatment at index date (untreated group) and (ii) under DMT treatment at index date (treated group).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following propensity score matching there were 3,869 patients in the treated and 3,869 patients in the untreated groups.</p><p>The untreated group numerically spent more days in hospital than the treated group (9.4 vs 7.8 days) and had more emergency room (ER)/urgent care visits (1.3 vs 1.0 visits).</p><p>There were no observed differences in time to relapse between groups.</p><p>At index relapse, pwMS were treated with glatiramer acetate (29%), interferons (27%), oral DMTs (29%), or intravenous DMTs (15%). During follow-up, 32% of the untreated group were treated with a DMT, mostly intravenous and oral DMTs. DMT treatment remained largely unchanged in the treated group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DMTs may provide shorter hospital stays and less frequent ER visits in older pwMS with active MS. Treatment inertia after relapse was high.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000471/pdfft?md5=c6cd02d11428d68a783b3ba06bb2132e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949916X24000471-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies in older adults with multiple sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Oisín Butler , Bianca Weinstock-Guttman , Dejan Jakimovski , Svetlana Eckert , Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik , Simone Heeg , Markus Schürks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can alter multiple sclerosis (MS) disease course.</p><p>Peak prevalence age for people with MS (pwMS) has increased, but little is known about MS clinical course or DMT response in older pwMS.</p><p>The objective of this retrospective analysis of a US administrative claims database to was to evaluate MS disease course, DMT use, healthcare utilisation, and time to relapse during follow-up, in pwMS ≥50 years with active disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Inclusion criteria were ≥3 years’ continuous enrolment, ≥1 MS relapse (index event), and age ≥50 years. Baseline period was 1 year prior to index event. Follow-up was 2 years.</p><p>Two patient categories were considered: (i) not under DMT treatment at index date (untreated group) and (ii) under DMT treatment at index date (treated group).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following propensity score matching there were 3,869 patients in the treated and 3,869 patients in the untreated groups.</p><p>The untreated group numerically spent more days in hospital than the treated group (9.4 vs 7.8 days) and had more emergency room (ER)/urgent care visits (1.3 vs 1.0 visits).</p><p>There were no observed differences in time to relapse between groups.</p><p>At index relapse, pwMS were treated with glatiramer acetate (29%), interferons (27%), oral DMTs (29%), or intravenous DMTs (15%). During follow-up, 32% of the untreated group were treated with a DMT, mostly intravenous and oral DMTs. DMT treatment remained largely unchanged in the treated group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DMTs may provide shorter hospital stays and less frequent ER visits in older pwMS with active MS. Treatment inertia after relapse was high.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000471/pdfft?md5=c6cd02d11428d68a783b3ba06bb2132e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949916X24000471-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景改变病情疗法(DMT)可改变多发性硬化症(MS)的病程。MS 患者(pwMS)的发病高峰年龄有所上升,但人们对老年 pwMS 的 MS 临床病程或 DMT 反应知之甚少。本研究对美国行政索赔数据库进行了回顾性分析,目的是评估年龄≥50 岁的活动性多发性硬化症患者的病程、DMT 使用情况、医疗保健使用情况以及随访期间的复发时间。基线期为指数事件发生前 1 年。随访期为 2 年。考虑了两类患者:(i) 在指数日期未接受 DMT 治疗(未治疗组)和 (ii) 在指数日期接受 DMT 治疗(已治疗组)。未治疗组的住院天数(9.4 天 vs 7.8 天)和急诊室/急诊就诊次数(1.3 次 vs 1.0 次)均高于治疗组。在随访期间,未接受治疗组中有 32% 接受了 DMT 治疗,主要是静脉注射和口服 DMT。结论DMT可缩短活动性多发性硬化症老年患者的住院时间,减少急诊室就诊次数。复发后的治疗惰性很高。
Real-world effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies in older adults with multiple sclerosis
Background
Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can alter multiple sclerosis (MS) disease course.
Peak prevalence age for people with MS (pwMS) has increased, but little is known about MS clinical course or DMT response in older pwMS.
The objective of this retrospective analysis of a US administrative claims database to was to evaluate MS disease course, DMT use, healthcare utilisation, and time to relapse during follow-up, in pwMS ≥50 years with active disease.
Methods
Inclusion criteria were ≥3 years’ continuous enrolment, ≥1 MS relapse (index event), and age ≥50 years. Baseline period was 1 year prior to index event. Follow-up was 2 years.
Two patient categories were considered: (i) not under DMT treatment at index date (untreated group) and (ii) under DMT treatment at index date (treated group).
Results
Following propensity score matching there were 3,869 patients in the treated and 3,869 patients in the untreated groups.
The untreated group numerically spent more days in hospital than the treated group (9.4 vs 7.8 days) and had more emergency room (ER)/urgent care visits (1.3 vs 1.0 visits).
There were no observed differences in time to relapse between groups.
At index relapse, pwMS were treated with glatiramer acetate (29%), interferons (27%), oral DMTs (29%), or intravenous DMTs (15%). During follow-up, 32% of the untreated group were treated with a DMT, mostly intravenous and oral DMTs. DMT treatment remained largely unchanged in the treated group.
Conclusion
DMTs may provide shorter hospital stays and less frequent ER visits in older pwMS with active MS. Treatment inertia after relapse was high.