通过液滴数字 PCR 进行原生生物定量的最佳过滤材料

Algae Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.4490/algae.2024.39.3.5
Juhee Min, Kwang Young Kim
{"title":"通过液滴数字 PCR 进行原生生物定量的最佳过滤材料","authors":"Juhee Min, Kwang Young Kim","doi":"10.4490/algae.2024.39.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) has greatly improved the quantification of harmful protists, outperforming traditional methods like quantitative PCR. Notably, ddPCR provides enhanced consistency and reproducibility at it resists PCR inhibitors commonly found in environmental DNA samples. This study aimed to determine the most effective filter material for ddPCR protocols by assessing the reproducibility of species-specific gene copy numbers and filtration time across six filter types: cellulose acetate (CA), mixed cellulose ester (MCE), nylon (NY), polycarbonate (PC), polyethersulfone (PES), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The study used two species of Chattonella marina complexes as a case study. Filtration rates were slower for NY, PC, and PVDF filters. Moreover, MCE, NY, PES, and PVDF yielded lower DNA amounts than other filters. Importantly, the CA filter exhibited the lowest variance (38–39%) and the highest determination coefficients (R2 = 0.92–0.96), indicating superior performance. These findings suggest that the CA filter is the most suitable for ddPCR quantification of marine protists, offering quick filtration and reliable reproducibility.","PeriodicalId":504557,"journal":{"name":"Algae","volume":" 68","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal filter materials for protist quantification via droplet digital PCR\",\"authors\":\"Juhee Min, Kwang Young Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4490/algae.2024.39.3.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) has greatly improved the quantification of harmful protists, outperforming traditional methods like quantitative PCR. Notably, ddPCR provides enhanced consistency and reproducibility at it resists PCR inhibitors commonly found in environmental DNA samples. This study aimed to determine the most effective filter material for ddPCR protocols by assessing the reproducibility of species-specific gene copy numbers and filtration time across six filter types: cellulose acetate (CA), mixed cellulose ester (MCE), nylon (NY), polycarbonate (PC), polyethersulfone (PES), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The study used two species of Chattonella marina complexes as a case study. Filtration rates were slower for NY, PC, and PVDF filters. Moreover, MCE, NY, PES, and PVDF yielded lower DNA amounts than other filters. Importantly, the CA filter exhibited the lowest variance (38–39%) and the highest determination coefficients (R2 = 0.92–0.96), indicating superior performance. These findings suggest that the CA filter is the most suitable for ddPCR quantification of marine protists, offering quick filtration and reliable reproducibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algae\",\"volume\":\" 68\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2024.39.3.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2024.39.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

液滴数字聚合酶链式反应(ddPCR)的使用大大改进了有害原生生物的定量分析,优于定量 PCR 等传统方法。值得注意的是,ddPCR 能够抵御环境 DNA 样本中常见的 PCR 抑制剂,因此具有更高的一致性和可重复性。本研究旨在通过评估醋酸纤维素(CA)、混合纤维素酯(MCE)、尼龙(NY)、聚碳酸酯(PC)、聚醚砜(PES)和聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)这六种过滤器的物种特异性基因拷贝数和过滤时间的重现性,确定 ddPCR 方案最有效的过滤器材料。该研究以两种 Chattonella marina 复合物为案例。NY、PC 和 PVDF 过滤器的过滤速度较慢。此外,与其他过滤器相比,MCE、NY、PES 和 PVDF 产生的 DNA 量较低。重要的是,CA 过滤器的方差(38-39%)最小,确定系数(R2 = 0.92-0.96)最高,表明其性能优越。这些研究结果表明,CA 过滤器最适合用于 ddPCR 定量海洋原生动物,具有快速过滤和可靠的重现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal filter materials for protist quantification via droplet digital PCR
The use of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) has greatly improved the quantification of harmful protists, outperforming traditional methods like quantitative PCR. Notably, ddPCR provides enhanced consistency and reproducibility at it resists PCR inhibitors commonly found in environmental DNA samples. This study aimed to determine the most effective filter material for ddPCR protocols by assessing the reproducibility of species-specific gene copy numbers and filtration time across six filter types: cellulose acetate (CA), mixed cellulose ester (MCE), nylon (NY), polycarbonate (PC), polyethersulfone (PES), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The study used two species of Chattonella marina complexes as a case study. Filtration rates were slower for NY, PC, and PVDF filters. Moreover, MCE, NY, PES, and PVDF yielded lower DNA amounts than other filters. Importantly, the CA filter exhibited the lowest variance (38–39%) and the highest determination coefficients (R2 = 0.92–0.96), indicating superior performance. These findings suggest that the CA filter is the most suitable for ddPCR quantification of marine protists, offering quick filtration and reliable reproducibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信