第三人拥有的手持抵押标的物拍卖执行过程中违约债务人的安排和地位

Kasiani Kasiani, Weppy Susetiyo
{"title":"第三人拥有的手持抵押标的物拍卖执行过程中违约债务人的安排和地位","authors":"Kasiani Kasiani, Weppy Susetiyo","doi":"10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.2865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit agreements utilizing Mortgage Rights provide preferential treatment to creditors. In case of debtor default, creditors can liquidate the mortgaged land to settle the debt. The Indonesian Mortgage Law (UUHT) only allows for extrajudicial foreclosure with consent from the grantor and the mortgagee. However, the regulation concerning third-party foreclosure and the debtor's position in this process under UUHT remains ambiguous. This research employs a normative approach, utilizing statutory and conceptual methods. Findings reveal that UUHT does not specifically regulate third-party foreclosure sales. Debtors act solely as recipients of debt repayment rights, yet they hold influence in determining the foreclosure process. Consequently, creditors lose the ability to independently sell the property and recover payments, thus diminishing creditor preference.","PeriodicalId":499908,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Supremasi","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengaturan dan Kedudukan Debitur Wanprestasi dalam Proses Eksekusi Penjualan Objek Hak Tanggungan Milik Pihak Ketiga Secara di Bawah Tangan\",\"authors\":\"Kasiani Kasiani, Weppy Susetiyo\",\"doi\":\"10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.2865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credit agreements utilizing Mortgage Rights provide preferential treatment to creditors. In case of debtor default, creditors can liquidate the mortgaged land to settle the debt. The Indonesian Mortgage Law (UUHT) only allows for extrajudicial foreclosure with consent from the grantor and the mortgagee. However, the regulation concerning third-party foreclosure and the debtor's position in this process under UUHT remains ambiguous. This research employs a normative approach, utilizing statutory and conceptual methods. Findings reveal that UUHT does not specifically regulate third-party foreclosure sales. Debtors act solely as recipients of debt repayment rights, yet they hold influence in determining the foreclosure process. Consequently, creditors lose the ability to independently sell the property and recover payments, thus diminishing creditor preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Supremasi\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Supremasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.2865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Supremasi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.2865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用抵押权的信贷协议为债权人提供优惠待遇。如果债务人违约,债权人可以将抵押土地变现以偿还债务。印度尼西亚《抵押法》(UUHT)只允许在征得设保人和抵押权人同意的情况下进行法外取消抵押品赎回权。然而,UUHT 中关于第三方取消抵押品赎回权的规定以及债务人在此过程中的地位仍不明确。本研究采用了规范性方法,利用了法定方法和概念方法。研究结果表明,UUHT 并未对第三方止赎销售做出具体规定。债务人仅作为债务偿还权的接受者,但他们在决定止赎程序方面却拥有影响力。因此,债权人失去了独立出售财产和收回付款的能力,从而削弱了债权人的优先权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pengaturan dan Kedudukan Debitur Wanprestasi dalam Proses Eksekusi Penjualan Objek Hak Tanggungan Milik Pihak Ketiga Secara di Bawah Tangan
Credit agreements utilizing Mortgage Rights provide preferential treatment to creditors. In case of debtor default, creditors can liquidate the mortgaged land to settle the debt. The Indonesian Mortgage Law (UUHT) only allows for extrajudicial foreclosure with consent from the grantor and the mortgagee. However, the regulation concerning third-party foreclosure and the debtor's position in this process under UUHT remains ambiguous. This research employs a normative approach, utilizing statutory and conceptual methods. Findings reveal that UUHT does not specifically regulate third-party foreclosure sales. Debtors act solely as recipients of debt repayment rights, yet they hold influence in determining the foreclosure process. Consequently, creditors lose the ability to independently sell the property and recover payments, thus diminishing creditor preference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信