{"title":"Baia Mare氰化物泄漏案中的跨界污染:欧盟和捷克法律的各个方面(第二卷)","authors":"Denisa Hlušičková, Ondřej Vícha","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2024.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper is the second part of an article dealing with the mining accident that took place in 2000 in the Romanian town of Baia Mare, which has been described as one of the worst environmental disasters since the Chernobyl accident. The first part focused on the circumstances of the accident, its consequences, and an analysis of the international legal framework in force at the time of the incident. The authors also describe the changes in international law adopted in response to the accident in Baia Mare and analyse the relevant case-law of the ECtHR related to the Baia Mare accident, Tǎtar v. Romania case. In the second part of the article, the authors discuss the response to the accident at the level of the European Union and the key changes in EU legislation adopted as a result of the accident. The article also points to changes made in national law in the Czech Republic, which directly or indirectly responded to the accident in Baia Mare. In conclusion, the authors relate this mine accident to the accident on the Bečva River that occurred in 2020.","PeriodicalId":158742,"journal":{"name":"AUC IURIDICA","volume":" 73","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Přeshraniční znečištění v případu úniku kyanidu z těžebního provozu v Baia Mare: aspekty unijního a českého práva (vol. II)\",\"authors\":\"Denisa Hlušičková, Ondřej Vícha\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2024.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following paper is the second part of an article dealing with the mining accident that took place in 2000 in the Romanian town of Baia Mare, which has been described as one of the worst environmental disasters since the Chernobyl accident. The first part focused on the circumstances of the accident, its consequences, and an analysis of the international legal framework in force at the time of the incident. The authors also describe the changes in international law adopted in response to the accident in Baia Mare and analyse the relevant case-law of the ECtHR related to the Baia Mare accident, Tǎtar v. Romania case. In the second part of the article, the authors discuss the response to the accident at the level of the European Union and the key changes in EU legislation adopted as a result of the accident. The article also points to changes made in national law in the Czech Republic, which directly or indirectly responded to the accident in Baia Mare. In conclusion, the authors relate this mine accident to the accident on the Bečva River that occurred in 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AUC IURIDICA\",\"volume\":\" 73\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AUC IURIDICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC IURIDICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
下文是文章的第二部分,涉及 2000 年在罗马尼亚 Baia Mare 镇发生的采矿事故,该事故被称为切尔诺贝利事故以来最严重的环境灾难之一。第一部分重点介绍了事故的情况、后果以及对事故发生时有效的国际法律框架的分析。作者还介绍了针对 Baia Mare 事故所采取的国际法变革,并分析了欧洲人权法院与 Baia Mare 事故有关的相关判例法--Tǎtar 诉罗马尼亚案。在文章的第二部分,作者讨论了欧盟层面对该事故的反应,以及因该事故而通过的欧盟立法的主要变化。文章还指出了捷克共和国对国家法律所做的修改,这些修改直接或间接地回应了 Baia Mare 事故。最后,作者将此次矿难与 2020 年发生在贝奇瓦河上的事故联系起来。
Přeshraniční znečištění v případu úniku kyanidu z těžebního provozu v Baia Mare: aspekty unijního a českého práva (vol. II)
The following paper is the second part of an article dealing with the mining accident that took place in 2000 in the Romanian town of Baia Mare, which has been described as one of the worst environmental disasters since the Chernobyl accident. The first part focused on the circumstances of the accident, its consequences, and an analysis of the international legal framework in force at the time of the incident. The authors also describe the changes in international law adopted in response to the accident in Baia Mare and analyse the relevant case-law of the ECtHR related to the Baia Mare accident, Tǎtar v. Romania case. In the second part of the article, the authors discuss the response to the accident at the level of the European Union and the key changes in EU legislation adopted as a result of the accident. The article also points to changes made in national law in the Czech Republic, which directly or indirectly responded to the accident in Baia Mare. In conclusion, the authors relate this mine accident to the accident on the Bečva River that occurred in 2020.