印度尼西亚法律体系对土著人民权利规定的矛盾性

Andika Prawira Buana, Muhammad Arsy
{"title":"印度尼西亚法律体系对土著人民权利规定的矛盾性","authors":"Andika Prawira Buana, Muhammad Arsy","doi":"10.24252/aldev.v6i1.44923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recognition and protection of indigenous peoples in Indonesia remain uncertain due to the absence of ratified laws specifically addressing their rights. This lack of legal instruments undermines their recognition and protection, leading to uncertainty regarding their traditional rights. This article aims to identify potential arrangements for derivative regulations to address this gap. Normative legal research, employing a legislative and conceptual approach, was utilized. The findings suggest that while legal recognition of indigenous peoples exists in various laws, regional regulations tailored to local conditions are necessary. However, there's no consensus on which regulations should serve as the basis for these regional laws. Recommendations propose that the Agrarian Law, Human Rights Law, Village Law, and Job Creation Law could inform regional regulations to recognize, protect, and fulfill the traditional rights of indigenous peoples, thereby mitigating dualism of authority.","PeriodicalId":202916,"journal":{"name":"Alauddin Law Development Journal","volume":"112 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambivalence in The Regulation of Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Indonesia's Legal Hierarchy\",\"authors\":\"Andika Prawira Buana, Muhammad Arsy\",\"doi\":\"10.24252/aldev.v6i1.44923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recognition and protection of indigenous peoples in Indonesia remain uncertain due to the absence of ratified laws specifically addressing their rights. This lack of legal instruments undermines their recognition and protection, leading to uncertainty regarding their traditional rights. This article aims to identify potential arrangements for derivative regulations to address this gap. Normative legal research, employing a legislative and conceptual approach, was utilized. The findings suggest that while legal recognition of indigenous peoples exists in various laws, regional regulations tailored to local conditions are necessary. However, there's no consensus on which regulations should serve as the basis for these regional laws. Recommendations propose that the Agrarian Law, Human Rights Law, Village Law, and Job Creation Law could inform regional regulations to recognize, protect, and fulfill the traditional rights of indigenous peoples, thereby mitigating dualism of authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alauddin Law Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"112 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alauddin Law Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i1.44923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alauddin Law Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i1.44923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏专门针对土著人民权利的已批准法律,印度尼西亚对土著人民的承认和保护仍然不确定。法律文书的缺失削弱了对他们的承认和保护,导致他们的传统权利不确定。本文旨在确定衍生法规的潜在安排,以填补这一空白。文章采用立法和概念方法,进行了规范性法律研究。研究结果表明,虽然各种法律都承认土著人民的权利,但有必要制定适合当地情况的地区性法规。然而,对于应以哪些法规作为这些地区性法律的基础还没有达成共识。建议提出,《土地法》、《人权法》、《村庄法》和《创造就业法》可以作为地区法规的依据,以承认、保护和实现土著人民的传统权利,从而缓解权力的二元化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambivalence in The Regulation of Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Indonesia's Legal Hierarchy
The recognition and protection of indigenous peoples in Indonesia remain uncertain due to the absence of ratified laws specifically addressing their rights. This lack of legal instruments undermines their recognition and protection, leading to uncertainty regarding their traditional rights. This article aims to identify potential arrangements for derivative regulations to address this gap. Normative legal research, employing a legislative and conceptual approach, was utilized. The findings suggest that while legal recognition of indigenous peoples exists in various laws, regional regulations tailored to local conditions are necessary. However, there's no consensus on which regulations should serve as the basis for these regional laws. Recommendations propose that the Agrarian Law, Human Rights Law, Village Law, and Job Creation Law could inform regional regulations to recognize, protect, and fulfill the traditional rights of indigenous peoples, thereby mitigating dualism of authority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信