{"title":"范奥斯特罗姆和良知的历史电视?","authors":"Pieter Van den Heede","doi":"10.51769/bmgn-lchr.17757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Finally, I make a plea for a study of the broader reception of these series, in order to mark the value of this type of research for public history.","PeriodicalId":504931,"journal":{"name":"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review","volume":"114 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?\",\"authors\":\"Pieter Van den Heede\",\"doi\":\"10.51769/bmgn-lchr.17757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Finally, I make a plea for a study of the broader reception of these series, in order to mark the value of this type of research for public history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"114 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.17757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.17757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇论文中,我从公共历史的角度,对《荷兰的故事》(Het verhaal van Nederland)和《佛兰德斯的故事》(Het verhaal van Vlaanderen)这两部历史作品进行了比较分析。我将重点关注对公共史学家非常重要的三个领域。首先,我将讨论这两部电视剧的制作背景,因为它们决定了历史学家提供专业知识的框架。然后,我将分析所采用的叙事技巧及其如何塑造内容,以及这些技巧是否扭曲了历史叙事。最后,我呼吁对这两部剧集更广泛的接受情况进行研究,以确定这类研究对公共历史的价值。
Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Finally, I make a plea for a study of the broader reception of these series, in order to mark the value of this type of research for public history.