批判种族理论：政策语言如何以不同方式参与象征性种族主义和党派纷争

IF 4 1区社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Perspectives on Politics Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1017/s1537592724000240

Mia Carbone, Allison Harell, Stuart Soroka

{"title":"批判种族理论：政策语言如何以不同方式参与象征性种族主义和党派纷争","authors":"Mia Carbone, Allison Harell, Stuart Soroka","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen a marked shift in the salience and politicization of any incorporation of race into teaching at the elementary and secondary levels. “Critical race theory” (CRT) has become a prominent feature of the current debate, even as there is a good deal of misunderstanding about what CRT actually is. Drawing on a pre-registered survey experiment, we consider the impact of the phrase “critical race theory” in activating both racial biases and partisan identity. Our expectation was that CRT would tend to activate partisanship independent of symbolic racism. Results suggest otherwise: where support for culturally relevant pedagogy is concerned, CRT appears to engage partisanship particularly amongst those who exhibit high levels of symbolic racism.","PeriodicalId":48097,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Race Theory: How Policy Language Differentially Engages Symbolic Racism and Partisanship\",\"authors\":\"Mia Carbone, Allison Harell, Stuart Soroka\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1537592724000240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have seen a marked shift in the salience and politicization of any incorporation of race into teaching at the elementary and secondary levels. “Critical race theory” (CRT) has become a prominent feature of the current debate, even as there is a good deal of misunderstanding about what CRT actually is. Drawing on a pre-registered survey experiment, we consider the impact of the phrase “critical race theory” in activating both racial biases and partisan identity. Our expectation was that CRT would tend to activate partisanship independent of symbolic racism. Results suggest otherwise: where support for culturally relevant pedagogy is concerned, CRT appears to engage partisanship particularly amongst those who exhibit high levels of symbolic racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592724000240\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592724000240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来，将种族问题纳入中小学教学的重要性和政治性发生了明显的变化。种族批判理论"（CRT）已成为当前争论的一个突出特点，尽管人们对 "种族批判理论 "的实际内涵还存在很多误解。通过预先登记的调查实验，我们考虑了 "种族批判理论 "一词在激活种族偏见和党派认同方面的影响。我们的预期是，"批判性种族理论 "倾向于激活独立于象征性种族主义的党派认同。结果表明并非如此：在支持文化相关教学法方面，批判性种族理论似乎特别能激发那些表现出高度象征性种族主义的人的党派意识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Critical Race Theory: How Policy Language Differentially Engages Symbolic Racism and Partisanship

Recent years have seen a marked shift in the salience and politicization of any incorporation of race into teaching at the elementary and secondary levels. “Critical race theory” (CRT) has become a prominent feature of the current debate, even as there is a good deal of misunderstanding about what CRT actually is. Drawing on a pre-registered survey experiment, we consider the impact of the phrase “critical race theory” in activating both racial biases and partisan identity. Our expectation was that CRT would tend to activate partisanship independent of symbolic racism. Results suggest otherwise: where support for culturally relevant pedagogy is concerned, CRT appears to engage partisanship particularly amongst those who exhibit high levels of symbolic racism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Perspectives on Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

313

期刊介绍： Perspectives on Politics is a journal of broad interest to scholars across many fields, in addition to professional political scientists, political analysts, policy makers, and the informed public. Essays synthesize and extend significant research and developments in all dimensions of political science scholarship. In many cases, the journal aims to connect research findings, conceptual innovations, or theoretical developments to real problems of politics.