J. B. Cabral Júnior, C. A. Souza Filho, G. J. A. Amorim, R. A. P. Oliveira, L. A. I. A. Ramos, R. C. Souza, F. J. C. Cavalcante
{"title":"(O-26) 一家公立医院为治疗勃起功能障碍患者实施海绵体内注射治疗计划的初步经验","authors":"J. B. Cabral Júnior, C. A. Souza Filho, G. J. A. Amorim, R. A. P. Oliveira, L. A. I. A. Ramos, R. C. Souza, F. J. C. Cavalcante","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Intracavernous injectable therapy (IIT) has been considered a second-line therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) since the emergence of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (IPDE-5) for oral use in the late 1990s. The ease of access to IPDE-5, with increasingly accessible costs, in addition to the safety and efficacy with the use of these medications, caused IIT to fall into disuse for a good period. In turn, about 30% of men with ED do not respond satisfactorily to the oral use of IPDE-5, needing to resort to some other form of treatment.\n \n \n \n Patients with ED unresponsive to oral IPDE-5 were referred for IIT. Subsequently, they were submitted to a questionnaire to evaluate the results.\n \n \n \n Eight men answered the applied questionnaire. The mean age of patients was 61 years (44-75 years). All patients reported that their partner was aware of the treatment used, and 75% of patients reported the presence of some comorbidity. The response to the test was considered satisfactory in 75% of the patients, with full erection (EHS 4) in 37.5%, and partial erection with penetration (EHS 3) in 37.5%. Only one patient (12.5%) reported not having adapted to the proposed treatment, despite having a satisfactory erection. After a 12-month follow-up, only one patient (12.5%) continues to use IIT, 3 (37.5%) opted for penile prosthesis implantation, while the others chose not to adhere to any subsequent treatment. In 62.5% of patients there was no report of any side effect.\n \n \n \n Despite high rates of efficacy and satisfaction reported in the literature, our initial experience showed a low rate of adherence to IIT. The team's lack of experience and difficulty in following up patients probably contributed to these results, revealing a need for better team training and patient guidance.\n \n \n \n No conflict.\n","PeriodicalId":377411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(O-26) INITIAL EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING AN INTRACAVERNOSAL INJECTABLE THERAPY PROGRAM FOR THE TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS AT A PUBLIC HOSPITAL\",\"authors\":\"J. B. Cabral Júnior, C. A. Souza Filho, G. J. A. Amorim, R. A. P. Oliveira, L. A. I. A. Ramos, R. C. Souza, F. J. C. Cavalcante\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Intracavernous injectable therapy (IIT) has been considered a second-line therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) since the emergence of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (IPDE-5) for oral use in the late 1990s. The ease of access to IPDE-5, with increasingly accessible costs, in addition to the safety and efficacy with the use of these medications, caused IIT to fall into disuse for a good period. In turn, about 30% of men with ED do not respond satisfactorily to the oral use of IPDE-5, needing to resort to some other form of treatment.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients with ED unresponsive to oral IPDE-5 were referred for IIT. Subsequently, they were submitted to a questionnaire to evaluate the results.\\n \\n \\n \\n Eight men answered the applied questionnaire. The mean age of patients was 61 years (44-75 years). All patients reported that their partner was aware of the treatment used, and 75% of patients reported the presence of some comorbidity. The response to the test was considered satisfactory in 75% of the patients, with full erection (EHS 4) in 37.5%, and partial erection with penetration (EHS 3) in 37.5%. Only one patient (12.5%) reported not having adapted to the proposed treatment, despite having a satisfactory erection. After a 12-month follow-up, only one patient (12.5%) continues to use IIT, 3 (37.5%) opted for penile prosthesis implantation, while the others chose not to adhere to any subsequent treatment. In 62.5% of patients there was no report of any side effect.\\n \\n \\n \\n Despite high rates of efficacy and satisfaction reported in the literature, our initial experience showed a low rate of adherence to IIT. The team's lack of experience and difficulty in following up patients probably contributed to these results, revealing a need for better team training and patient guidance.\\n \\n \\n \\n No conflict.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":377411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Sexual Medicine\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Sexual Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
(O-26) INITIAL EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING AN INTRACAVERNOSAL INJECTABLE THERAPY PROGRAM FOR THE TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS AT A PUBLIC HOSPITAL
Intracavernous injectable therapy (IIT) has been considered a second-line therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) since the emergence of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (IPDE-5) for oral use in the late 1990s. The ease of access to IPDE-5, with increasingly accessible costs, in addition to the safety and efficacy with the use of these medications, caused IIT to fall into disuse for a good period. In turn, about 30% of men with ED do not respond satisfactorily to the oral use of IPDE-5, needing to resort to some other form of treatment.
Patients with ED unresponsive to oral IPDE-5 were referred for IIT. Subsequently, they were submitted to a questionnaire to evaluate the results.
Eight men answered the applied questionnaire. The mean age of patients was 61 years (44-75 years). All patients reported that their partner was aware of the treatment used, and 75% of patients reported the presence of some comorbidity. The response to the test was considered satisfactory in 75% of the patients, with full erection (EHS 4) in 37.5%, and partial erection with penetration (EHS 3) in 37.5%. Only one patient (12.5%) reported not having adapted to the proposed treatment, despite having a satisfactory erection. After a 12-month follow-up, only one patient (12.5%) continues to use IIT, 3 (37.5%) opted for penile prosthesis implantation, while the others chose not to adhere to any subsequent treatment. In 62.5% of patients there was no report of any side effect.
Despite high rates of efficacy and satisfaction reported in the literature, our initial experience showed a low rate of adherence to IIT. The team's lack of experience and difficulty in following up patients probably contributed to these results, revealing a need for better team training and patient guidance.
No conflict.