人文地理：不是终结而是以新的方式将现代学科世界化

IF 8.2 1区社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY

Dialogues in Human Geography Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1177/20438206241242467

Jonathan Pugh

{"title":"人文地理：不是终结而是以新的方式将现代学科世界化","authors":"Jonathan Pugh","doi":"10.1177/20438206241242467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary engages Bodden's (2023) ‘Working through our differences’ to draw out how contemporary frameworks of reasoning in human geography extend the limits of ‘thinkability’, expanding the world, of the modern subject. In response, I offer ‘Abyssal Geography’, critiquing how the discipline is not ending but worlding the modern subject in new ways.","PeriodicalId":47300,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Human Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human geography: Not ending but worlding the modern subject in new ways\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Pugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20438206241242467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary engages Bodden's (2023) ‘Working through our differences’ to draw out how contemporary frameworks of reasoning in human geography extend the limits of ‘thinkability’, expanding the world, of the modern subject. In response, I offer ‘Abyssal Geography’, critiquing how the discipline is not ending but worlding the modern subject in new ways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in Human Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in Human Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206241242467\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206241242467","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论引用了博登（2023 年）的 "通过我们的差异开展工作 "一文，引出当代人文地理学的推理框架是如何扩展现代学科的 "可思性 "限制、扩大世界的。作为回应，我提出了 "深渊地理学"，批判了该学科如何不是终结而是以新的方式将现代学科世界化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Human geography: Not ending but worlding the modern subject in new ways

This commentary engages Bodden's (2023) ‘Working through our differences’ to draw out how contemporary frameworks of reasoning in human geography extend the limits of ‘thinkability’, expanding the world, of the modern subject. In response, I offer ‘Abyssal Geography’, critiquing how the discipline is not ending but worlding the modern subject in new ways.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dialogues in Human Geography GEOGRAPHY-

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dialogues in Human Geography aims to foster open and critical debate on the philosophical, methodological, and pedagogical underpinnings of geographic thought and practice. The journal publishes articles, accompanied by responses, that critique current thinking and practice while charting future directions for geographic thought, empirical research, and pedagogy. Dialogues is theoretically oriented, forward-looking, and seeks to publish original and innovative work that expands the boundaries of geographical theory, practice, and pedagogy through a unique format of open peer commentary. This format encourages engaged dialogue. The journal's scope encompasses the broader agenda of human geography within the context of social sciences, humanities, and environmental sciences, as well as specific ideas, debates, and practices within disciplinary subfields. It is relevant and useful to those interested in all aspects of the discipline.