风险偏好和保险选择中的性别差异

Tim Oliver
{"title":"风险偏好和保险选择中的性别差异","authors":"Tim Oliver","doi":"10.47941/jar.1759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to examine gender differences in risk preferences and insurance choices. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to gender differences in risk preferences and insurance choices. The study provided valuable insights into the complex dynamics shaping individuals' attitudes towards risk and insurance decisions. Through comprehensive analysis, it confirmed significant gender disparities in risk preferences, with men generally exhibiting higher levels of risk tolerance compared to women. Additionally, it revealed that women demonstrated a greater propensity to purchase insurance coverage, contrary to traditional stereotypes. The study emphasized the importance of considering intersectionality in understanding gender disparities in insurance access and highlighted the role of behavioral economics in influencing decision-making processes. Overall, the findings underscored the need for targeted interventions and policy initiatives to address gender-based disparities in insurance access and promote financial well-being across diverse populations. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Role theory, Behavioural Economics and Feminist theory may be used to anchor future studies on risk preferences and insurance choices. The study made several recommendations to address gender disparities in risk management and insurance access. It suggested the development of targeted financial education programs, gender-sensitive insurance products, and regulatory measures to promote gender equality in insurance coverage. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of fostering diversity and inclusion within the insurance industry and continuing research to monitor progress over time. By implementing these recommendations, stakeholders aimed to create more inclusive and equitable insurance markets, enhancing financial security and well-being for all individuals. \nKeywords: Gender Differences, Risk Preferences, Insurance Choices, Financial Education, Gender-Sensitive, Regulatory Measures, Diversity, Inclusion, Equity","PeriodicalId":502929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Actuarial Research","volume":"52 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Risk Preferences and Insurance Choices\",\"authors\":\"Tim Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.47941/jar.1759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to examine gender differences in risk preferences and insurance choices. \\nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \\nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to gender differences in risk preferences and insurance choices. The study provided valuable insights into the complex dynamics shaping individuals' attitudes towards risk and insurance decisions. Through comprehensive analysis, it confirmed significant gender disparities in risk preferences, with men generally exhibiting higher levels of risk tolerance compared to women. Additionally, it revealed that women demonstrated a greater propensity to purchase insurance coverage, contrary to traditional stereotypes. The study emphasized the importance of considering intersectionality in understanding gender disparities in insurance access and highlighted the role of behavioral economics in influencing decision-making processes. Overall, the findings underscored the need for targeted interventions and policy initiatives to address gender-based disparities in insurance access and promote financial well-being across diverse populations. \\nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Role theory, Behavioural Economics and Feminist theory may be used to anchor future studies on risk preferences and insurance choices. The study made several recommendations to address gender disparities in risk management and insurance access. It suggested the development of targeted financial education programs, gender-sensitive insurance products, and regulatory measures to promote gender equality in insurance coverage. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of fostering diversity and inclusion within the insurance industry and continuing research to monitor progress over time. By implementing these recommendations, stakeholders aimed to create more inclusive and equitable insurance markets, enhancing financial security and well-being for all individuals. \\nKeywords: Gender Differences, Risk Preferences, Insurance Choices, Financial Education, Gender-Sensitive, Regulatory Measures, Diversity, Inclusion, Equity\",\"PeriodicalId\":502929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Actuarial Research\",\"volume\":\"52 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Actuarial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47941/jar.1759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Actuarial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/jar.1759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的总体目的是探讨性别在风险偏好和保险选择方面的差异。研究方法:研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地调查即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此,与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及行政人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在风险偏好和保险选择的性别差异方面存在着背景和方法上的差距。这项研究为了解影响个人对风险和保险决策态度的复杂动态提供了宝贵的见解。通过综合分析,研究证实了男女在风险偏好方面的显著差异,男性的风险承受能力普遍高于女性。此外,研究还显示,与传统的刻板印象相反,女性更倾向于购买保险。该研究强调了在理解保险获取方面的性别差异时考虑交叉性的重要性,并突出了行为经济学在影响决策过程中的作用。总之,研究结果强调了有必要采取有针对性的干预措施和政策措施,以解决保险获取方面的性别差异,促进不同人群的财务福祉。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:社会角色理论、行为经济学和女性主义理论可用于今后有关风险偏好和保险选择的研究。该研究针对风险管理和保险获取方面的性别差异提出了若干建议。它建议制定有针对性的金融教育计划、对性别问题有敏感认识的保险产品和监管措施,以促进保险覆盖范围内的性别平等。此外,该研究还强调了在保险行业内促进多样性和包容性的重要性,以及继续开展研究以监测长期进展的重要性。通过实施这些建议,利益相关者旨在创建更具包容性和公平性的保险市场,从而提高所有人的财务安全和福祉。关键词性别差异、风险偏好、保险选择、金融教育、性别敏感性、监管措施、多样性、包容性、公平性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Differences in Risk Preferences and Insurance Choices
Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to examine gender differences in risk preferences and insurance choices. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to gender differences in risk preferences and insurance choices. The study provided valuable insights into the complex dynamics shaping individuals' attitudes towards risk and insurance decisions. Through comprehensive analysis, it confirmed significant gender disparities in risk preferences, with men generally exhibiting higher levels of risk tolerance compared to women. Additionally, it revealed that women demonstrated a greater propensity to purchase insurance coverage, contrary to traditional stereotypes. The study emphasized the importance of considering intersectionality in understanding gender disparities in insurance access and highlighted the role of behavioral economics in influencing decision-making processes. Overall, the findings underscored the need for targeted interventions and policy initiatives to address gender-based disparities in insurance access and promote financial well-being across diverse populations. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Role theory, Behavioural Economics and Feminist theory may be used to anchor future studies on risk preferences and insurance choices. The study made several recommendations to address gender disparities in risk management and insurance access. It suggested the development of targeted financial education programs, gender-sensitive insurance products, and regulatory measures to promote gender equality in insurance coverage. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of fostering diversity and inclusion within the insurance industry and continuing research to monitor progress over time. By implementing these recommendations, stakeholders aimed to create more inclusive and equitable insurance markets, enhancing financial security and well-being for all individuals. Keywords: Gender Differences, Risk Preferences, Insurance Choices, Financial Education, Gender-Sensitive, Regulatory Measures, Diversity, Inclusion, Equity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信