分析坦桑尼亚作为政治辩论论坛的社交网络:坦桑尼亚 Chama Cha Mapinduzi 和 Chadema Twitter 平台案例

Jane Gamaliel, Francis Ng’atigwa
{"title":"分析坦桑尼亚作为政治辩论论坛的社交网络:坦桑尼亚 Chama Cha Mapinduzi 和 Chadema Twitter 平台案例","authors":"Jane Gamaliel, Francis Ng’atigwa","doi":"10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i5636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of social media platforms has transformed the way political debates are conducted in Tanzania. Among the social media platforms, Twitter is the most popular social network in Tanzania, and it has become an important tool for political communication and debates. Currently, political parties, including CCM and CHADEMA, have an active Twitter account, which they use to engage with their supporters and the general public. The paper presents part of the findings of the study on Assessment of Social Networks as Forums for Political Debates in Tanzania, A Case of Chama Cha Mapinduzi and Chadema Tanzania Twitter Platforms. This paper examines types of issues discussed on social media platforms, specifically focusing on Twitter accounts of Chadema Tanzania and Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM). It analyses the content of their posts, engagement levels, and the extent to which various issues are addressed. By studying these two prominent Tanzanian political parties, the paper aims to provide insights into the key political issues that garner attention and attraction on social media in the Tanzanian context. The paper uses Habermas’ theory of public sphere to analyse political discussions on the two Twitter accounts. The paper used the qualitative content analysis technique to explore the two Twitter accounts from January to March 2023. The study found that the two Twitter accounts have become a significant avenue for public discourse, enabling individuals to engage with political issues, express opinions, and connect with others. The discussions cover a wide range of topics, from local to global matters, and often include debates on policies, elections, governance, social justice, and more. The paper further found that there is freedom to obtain information that is not limited, and interaction in social media also encourages young voters to participate in political debates. The paper recommends that political parties invest more in social media to allow their members to engage in political discussions and debates to widen the horizon of democracy.","PeriodicalId":190996,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports","volume":"103 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Social Networks as Forums for Political Debates in Tanzania: A Case of Chama Cha Mapinduzi and Chadema Tanzania Twitter Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Jane Gamaliel, Francis Ng’atigwa\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i5636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of social media platforms has transformed the way political debates are conducted in Tanzania. Among the social media platforms, Twitter is the most popular social network in Tanzania, and it has become an important tool for political communication and debates. Currently, political parties, including CCM and CHADEMA, have an active Twitter account, which they use to engage with their supporters and the general public. The paper presents part of the findings of the study on Assessment of Social Networks as Forums for Political Debates in Tanzania, A Case of Chama Cha Mapinduzi and Chadema Tanzania Twitter Platforms. This paper examines types of issues discussed on social media platforms, specifically focusing on Twitter accounts of Chadema Tanzania and Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM). It analyses the content of their posts, engagement levels, and the extent to which various issues are addressed. By studying these two prominent Tanzanian political parties, the paper aims to provide insights into the key political issues that garner attention and attraction on social media in the Tanzanian context. The paper uses Habermas’ theory of public sphere to analyse political discussions on the two Twitter accounts. The paper used the qualitative content analysis technique to explore the two Twitter accounts from January to March 2023. The study found that the two Twitter accounts have become a significant avenue for public discourse, enabling individuals to engage with political issues, express opinions, and connect with others. The discussions cover a wide range of topics, from local to global matters, and often include debates on policies, elections, governance, social justice, and more. The paper further found that there is freedom to obtain information that is not limited, and interaction in social media also encourages young voters to participate in political debates. The paper recommends that political parties invest more in social media to allow their members to engage in political discussions and debates to widen the horizon of democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports\",\"volume\":\"103 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i5636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i5636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体平台的兴起改变了坦桑尼亚的政治辩论方式。在社交媒体平台中,推特是坦桑尼亚最受欢迎的社交网络,它已成为政治沟通和辩论的重要工具。目前,包括CCM和CHADEMA在内的各政党都拥有一个活跃的推特账户,并利用该账户与其支持者和公众进行互动。本文介绍了 "坦桑尼亚社交网络作为政治辩论论坛的评估,以坦桑尼亚 Chama Cha Mapinduzi 和 Chadema Twitter 平台为例 "研究的部分结果。本文研究了社交媒体平台上讨论的问题类型,特别关注坦桑尼亚查德马组织和查马查马平杜兹组织(CCM)的推特账户。本文分析了它们的帖子内容、参与程度以及各种问题的讨论程度。通过研究这两个著名的坦桑尼亚政党,本文旨在深入探讨在坦桑尼亚背景下社交媒体上引起关注和吸引力的关键政治问题。本文采用哈贝马斯的公共领域理论来分析这两个推特账户上的政治讨论。本文采用定性内容分析技术,对 2023 年 1 月至 3 月期间的两个推特账户进行了探讨。研究发现,这两个推特账户已成为公共讨论的重要途径,使个人能够参与政治议题、表达观点并与他人建立联系。这些讨论涵盖了从本地到全球事务的广泛话题,经常包括有关政策、选举、治理、社会正义等方面的辩论。论文还发现,获取信息的自由不受限制,社交媒体上的互动也鼓励年轻选民参与政治辩论。论文建议各政党加大对社交媒体的投入,让其成员参与政治讨论和辩论,以扩大民主的视野。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Social Networks as Forums for Political Debates in Tanzania: A Case of Chama Cha Mapinduzi and Chadema Tanzania Twitter Platforms
The rise of social media platforms has transformed the way political debates are conducted in Tanzania. Among the social media platforms, Twitter is the most popular social network in Tanzania, and it has become an important tool for political communication and debates. Currently, political parties, including CCM and CHADEMA, have an active Twitter account, which they use to engage with their supporters and the general public. The paper presents part of the findings of the study on Assessment of Social Networks as Forums for Political Debates in Tanzania, A Case of Chama Cha Mapinduzi and Chadema Tanzania Twitter Platforms. This paper examines types of issues discussed on social media platforms, specifically focusing on Twitter accounts of Chadema Tanzania and Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM). It analyses the content of their posts, engagement levels, and the extent to which various issues are addressed. By studying these two prominent Tanzanian political parties, the paper aims to provide insights into the key political issues that garner attention and attraction on social media in the Tanzanian context. The paper uses Habermas’ theory of public sphere to analyse political discussions on the two Twitter accounts. The paper used the qualitative content analysis technique to explore the two Twitter accounts from January to March 2023. The study found that the two Twitter accounts have become a significant avenue for public discourse, enabling individuals to engage with political issues, express opinions, and connect with others. The discussions cover a wide range of topics, from local to global matters, and often include debates on policies, elections, governance, social justice, and more. The paper further found that there is freedom to obtain information that is not limited, and interaction in social media also encourages young voters to participate in political debates. The paper recommends that political parties invest more in social media to allow their members to engage in political discussions and debates to widen the horizon of democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信