阻塞性气道疾病患者的体能和非活动能力："能做，会做 "分析

IF 4.3 3区医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00108-2024

Paola D Urroz Guerrero, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter G. Gibson, Vanessa L. Clark, Laura Cordova-Rivera, Vanessa M Mcdonald

{"title":"阻塞性气道疾病患者的体能和非活动能力：\"能做，会做 \"分析","authors":"Paola D Urroz Guerrero, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter G. Gibson, Vanessa L. Clark, Laura Cordova-Rivera, Vanessa M Mcdonald","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00108-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical capacity is an important determinant of physical activity in people with obstructive airway disease (OAD). This study aimed to extend the “can do, do do” concept in people with OAD, to identify if people categorised into quadrants based on physical capacity and activity differ by clinical and movement behaviour characteristics. A total of 281 participants (bronchiectasis n=60, severe asthma n=93, COPD n=70 and control n=58) completed assessments to characterise physical capacity as “can do”versus“can't do” (6-minute walk distance<or ≥70%predicted) and physical activity as “do do”versus“don't do” (accelerometer derived moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)<or ≥150 min/week). The control group had a greater proportion of people in the “can do, do do” quadrant compared with the OAD groups (76%versus10–33%). People with OAD in the “can't do, don't do” quadrant had worse clinical characteristics (airflow limitation, comorbidities, quality of life and functional dyspnoea) and spent less time doing light-intensity physical activity (LPA) and more time being sedentary compared with the “can do, do do” quadrant. This study highlights that many people with OAD may be inactive because they do not have the physical capacity to participate in MVPA, which is further impacted by greater disease severity. It is important to consider the potential benefits of addressing LPA and sedentary behaviour due to sub-optimal levels of these movement behaviours across different quadrants. Future research is needed to investigate if tailoring intervention approaches based on quadrant allocation is effective in people with OAD.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical capacity and inactivity in obstructive airway diseases: a ‘Can do, do do’ analysis\",\"authors\":\"Paola D Urroz Guerrero, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter G. Gibson, Vanessa L. Clark, Laura Cordova-Rivera, Vanessa M Mcdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00108-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical capacity is an important determinant of physical activity in people with obstructive airway disease (OAD). This study aimed to extend the “can do, do do” concept in people with OAD, to identify if people categorised into quadrants based on physical capacity and activity differ by clinical and movement behaviour characteristics. A total of 281 participants (bronchiectasis n=60, severe asthma n=93, COPD n=70 and control n=58) completed assessments to characterise physical capacity as “can do”versus“can't do” (6-minute walk distance<or ≥70%predicted) and physical activity as “do do”versus“don't do” (accelerometer derived moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)<or ≥150 min/week). The control group had a greater proportion of people in the “can do, do do” quadrant compared with the OAD groups (76%versus10–33%). People with OAD in the “can't do, don't do” quadrant had worse clinical characteristics (airflow limitation, comorbidities, quality of life and functional dyspnoea) and spent less time doing light-intensity physical activity (LPA) and more time being sedentary compared with the “can do, do do” quadrant. This study highlights that many people with OAD may be inactive because they do not have the physical capacity to participate in MVPA, which is further impacted by greater disease severity. It is important to consider the potential benefits of addressing LPA and sedentary behaviour due to sub-optimal levels of these movement behaviours across different quadrants. Future research is needed to investigate if tailoring intervention approaches based on quadrant allocation is effective in people with OAD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00108-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00108-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

体能是阻塞性气道疾病（OAD）患者体育活动的重要决定因素。本研究旨在扩展阻塞性气道疾病患者的 "能做，会做 "概念，以确定根据体能和活动量划分的象限是否因临床和运动行为特征而有所不同。共有 281 名参与者（支气管扩张症患者 60 人、重症哮喘患者 93 人、慢性阻塞性肺病患者 70 人和对照组患者 58 人）完成了评估，将体能分为 "能做 "和 "不能做"（6 分钟步行距离<或≥70% 预测值），将体力活动分为 "做 "和 "不做"（加速计得出的中高强度体力活动（MVPA）<或≥150 分钟/周）。与 OAD 组相比，对照组中处于 "能做，做 "象限的人数比例更高（76% 对 10-33%）。与 "能做，会做 "象限的 OAD 患者相比，"不能做，不会做 "象限的 OAD 患者临床特征（气流受限、合并症、生活质量和功能性呼吸困难）更差，进行轻强度体力活动（LPA）的时间更少，久坐不动的时间更多。这项研究强调，许多 OAD 患者之所以不活动，可能是因为他们没有参加 MVPA 的体能，而疾病的严重程度又进一步影响了他们的 MVPA。由于不同象限的运动行为未达到最佳水平，因此必须考虑解决低强度运动和久坐行为的潜在益处。未来的研究需要调查根据象限分配来定制干预方法是否对 OAD 患者有效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Physical capacity and inactivity in obstructive airway diseases: a ‘Can do, do do’ analysis

Physical capacity is an important determinant of physical activity in people with obstructive airway disease (OAD). This study aimed to extend the “can do, do do” concept in people with OAD, to identify if people categorised into quadrants based on physical capacity and activity differ by clinical and movement behaviour characteristics. A total of 281 participants (bronchiectasis n=60, severe asthma n=93, COPD n=70 and control n=58) completed assessments to characterise physical capacity as “can do”versus“can't do” (6-minute walk distance

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

4.30%

发文量

273

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.

京公网安备 11010802042870号

Book学术文献互助群
群号：481959085