{"title":"公共传播中的法律话语","authors":"Zarina Vasileva","doi":"10.58894/ztpa4893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An effective legal communication is one in which the recipient not only receives and comprehends the message addressed to him, but also responds with acceptance or rejection by engaging in a particular behavior. The media’s function as interpreters in the information flow between institutions and society is seen here, as well as vice versa. What are the most typical issues with comprehending and expressing legal terms, and do they succeed in realizing this function of theirs?","PeriodicalId":254824,"journal":{"name":"Media and Language Journal","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Discourse in Public Communication\",\"authors\":\"Zarina Vasileva\",\"doi\":\"10.58894/ztpa4893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An effective legal communication is one in which the recipient not only receives and comprehends the message addressed to him, but also responds with acceptance or rejection by engaging in a particular behavior. The media’s function as interpreters in the information flow between institutions and society is seen here, as well as vice versa. What are the most typical issues with comprehending and expressing legal terms, and do they succeed in realizing this function of theirs?\",\"PeriodicalId\":254824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media and Language Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media and Language Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58894/ztpa4893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58894/ztpa4893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An effective legal communication is one in which the recipient not only receives and comprehends the message addressed to him, but also responds with acceptance or rejection by engaging in a particular behavior. The media’s function as interpreters in the information flow between institutions and society is seen here, as well as vice versa. What are the most typical issues with comprehending and expressing legal terms, and do they succeed in realizing this function of theirs?