贝尔氏麻痹的诊断:新视角

M. Poovathingal, P. Gilvaz, Fiju Chacko, Neena Baby
{"title":"贝尔氏麻痹的诊断:新视角","authors":"M. Poovathingal, P. Gilvaz, Fiju Chacko, Neena Baby","doi":"10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bell’s palsy is considered as the most frequent cranial neuropathy. Early and adequate risk stratification may help both the patients and the treating physicians in taking informed decisions regarding treatment and understanding their outcomes. We aimed to formulate accessible and sensitive methods of risk stratification in Bell’s palsy by utilizing electrophysiological and hematological parameters.\nMethods: We prospectively followed up 101 patients with Bell’s palsy over a period of 18 months. Electrophysiological parameters were measured thrice i.e., on the first evaluation and after the first week and first month. The N/L, P/L ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were documented in steroid naïve cases. Patients were graded in severity based on the Sunnybrook and House Brackmann systems.\nResults: The mean SB and HB grades at admission were 53.89±24.725 and 3.92±1.04 indicating moderate severity. The mean N/L, P/L ratios and ESR on the first day was 3.46±3.45, 145.42±162.84 and 22.51±21.105 respectively. There was no statistical correlation with severity at any time point. The mean CMAP indices on the 1st day, 1st week and 1st month were 0.585±0.31,0.43±0.26 and 0.45±0.23 respectively. The CMAP index at 1 month was correlating with severity. Blink amplitude ratios were correlating with the HB scores at 1 week and 1 month (p<0.0001 both) and the SB score at 1 month (p<0.0001).\nConclusions: Hematological parameters were not correlated to disease severity. However, electrophysiological parameters are correlated to disease severity at one week and one month. Blink amplitude ratio may be a useful indicator for risk stratification of Bell’s palsy patients.","PeriodicalId":14210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"35 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostication of Bell’s palsy: a new perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Poovathingal, P. Gilvaz, Fiju Chacko, Neena Baby\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Bell’s palsy is considered as the most frequent cranial neuropathy. Early and adequate risk stratification may help both the patients and the treating physicians in taking informed decisions regarding treatment and understanding their outcomes. We aimed to formulate accessible and sensitive methods of risk stratification in Bell’s palsy by utilizing electrophysiological and hematological parameters.\\nMethods: We prospectively followed up 101 patients with Bell’s palsy over a period of 18 months. Electrophysiological parameters were measured thrice i.e., on the first evaluation and after the first week and first month. The N/L, P/L ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were documented in steroid naïve cases. Patients were graded in severity based on the Sunnybrook and House Brackmann systems.\\nResults: The mean SB and HB grades at admission were 53.89±24.725 and 3.92±1.04 indicating moderate severity. The mean N/L, P/L ratios and ESR on the first day was 3.46±3.45, 145.42±162.84 and 22.51±21.105 respectively. There was no statistical correlation with severity at any time point. The mean CMAP indices on the 1st day, 1st week and 1st month were 0.585±0.31,0.43±0.26 and 0.45±0.23 respectively. The CMAP index at 1 month was correlating with severity. Blink amplitude ratios were correlating with the HB scores at 1 week and 1 month (p<0.0001 both) and the SB score at 1 month (p<0.0001).\\nConclusions: Hematological parameters were not correlated to disease severity. However, electrophysiological parameters are correlated to disease severity at one week and one month. Blink amplitude ratio may be a useful indicator for risk stratification of Bell’s palsy patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"35 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:贝尔氏麻痹被认为是最常见的颅神经病。早期进行适当的风险分层有助于患者和主治医生做出明智的治疗决定并了解治疗效果。我们的目标是利用电生理学和血液学参数,制定便于使用且灵敏的贝尔氏麻痹风险分层方法:我们对 101 名贝尔麻痹患者进行了为期 18 个月的前瞻性随访。电生理参数测量了三次,即首次评估时、第一周后和第一个月后。在类固醇新发病例中记录了 N/L、P/L 比值、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)。根据桑尼布鲁克系统和豪斯-布拉克曼系统对患者的严重程度进行分级:入院时的平均 SB 和 HB 分级分别为 53.89±24.725 和 3.92±1.04 级,表明病情为中度严重。第一天的平均 N/L、P/L 比率和 ESR 分别为 3.46±3.45、145.42±162.84 和 22.51±21.105。各时间点的严重程度均无统计学相关性。第 1 天、第 1 周和第 1 个月的平均 CMAP 指数分别为 0.585±0.31、0.43±0.26 和 0.45±0.23。1 个月时的 CMAP 指数与严重程度相关。眨眼振幅比与 1 周和 1 个月时的 HB 评分相关(均 p<0.0001),与 1 个月时的 SB 评分相关(p<0.0001):结论:血液学参数与疾病严重程度无关。结论:血液学参数与疾病严重程度无关,但一周和一个月时的电生理参数与疾病严重程度相关。眨眼振幅比可能是对贝尔氏麻痹患者进行风险分层的有用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostication of Bell’s palsy: a new perspective
Background: Bell’s palsy is considered as the most frequent cranial neuropathy. Early and adequate risk stratification may help both the patients and the treating physicians in taking informed decisions regarding treatment and understanding their outcomes. We aimed to formulate accessible and sensitive methods of risk stratification in Bell’s palsy by utilizing electrophysiological and hematological parameters. Methods: We prospectively followed up 101 patients with Bell’s palsy over a period of 18 months. Electrophysiological parameters were measured thrice i.e., on the first evaluation and after the first week and first month. The N/L, P/L ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were documented in steroid naïve cases. Patients were graded in severity based on the Sunnybrook and House Brackmann systems. Results: The mean SB and HB grades at admission were 53.89±24.725 and 3.92±1.04 indicating moderate severity. The mean N/L, P/L ratios and ESR on the first day was 3.46±3.45, 145.42±162.84 and 22.51±21.105 respectively. There was no statistical correlation with severity at any time point. The mean CMAP indices on the 1st day, 1st week and 1st month were 0.585±0.31,0.43±0.26 and 0.45±0.23 respectively. The CMAP index at 1 month was correlating with severity. Blink amplitude ratios were correlating with the HB scores at 1 week and 1 month (p<0.0001 both) and the SB score at 1 month (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Hematological parameters were not correlated to disease severity. However, electrophysiological parameters are correlated to disease severity at one week and one month. Blink amplitude ratio may be a useful indicator for risk stratification of Bell’s palsy patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信