蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)蜂王、工蜂和无人机前翅的大小和形状差异

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY
A. Tofilski, Hardeep Kaur, S. Łopuch
{"title":"蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)蜂王、工蜂和无人机前翅的大小和形状差异","authors":"A. Tofilski, Hardeep Kaur, S. Łopuch","doi":"10.2478/jas-2023-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The three honey bee phenotypes - queens, workers, and drones differ in the size and shape of body parts. We used a large dataset to describe how the three phenotypes differed with regard to fore wings and applied the methodology of geometric morphometrics to measure the wings using the coordinates of nineteen landmarks. On average, queens had wings larger than workers, but the two castes had a broad overlap. Drones, on the other hand, had distinctly larger wings. Wing shape differed markedly among queens, workers and drones and can be used to reliably differentiate them from one other. Surprisingly, the fore wing shape of workers was more similar to that of drones than to that of queens. Small queens were not more similar to workers than large queens, and large workers were not more similar to queens than small workers. Because wing size, unlike body mass, does not change over the life of the queen, it can be used to evaluate the quality of a queen throughout its life and not only during a short period after emergence. We provide a large number of wing images of queens and drones, which can be used as a reference in future studies.","PeriodicalId":14941,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Apicultural Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size and Shape Differences in Fore Wings of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Queens, Workers and Drones\",\"authors\":\"A. Tofilski, Hardeep Kaur, S. Łopuch\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jas-2023-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The three honey bee phenotypes - queens, workers, and drones differ in the size and shape of body parts. We used a large dataset to describe how the three phenotypes differed with regard to fore wings and applied the methodology of geometric morphometrics to measure the wings using the coordinates of nineteen landmarks. On average, queens had wings larger than workers, but the two castes had a broad overlap. Drones, on the other hand, had distinctly larger wings. Wing shape differed markedly among queens, workers and drones and can be used to reliably differentiate them from one other. Surprisingly, the fore wing shape of workers was more similar to that of drones than to that of queens. Small queens were not more similar to workers than large queens, and large workers were not more similar to queens than small workers. Because wing size, unlike body mass, does not change over the life of the queen, it can be used to evaluate the quality of a queen throughout its life and not only during a short period after emergence. We provide a large number of wing images of queens and drones, which can be used as a reference in future studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Apicultural Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Apicultural Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2023-0013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Apicultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2023-0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜜蜂的三种表型--蜂王、工蜂和雄蜂--在身体部位的大小和形状上存在差异。我们利用一个大型数据集来描述三种表型在前翅方面的差异,并采用几何形态计量学的方法,利用 19 个地标坐标来测量翅膀。平均而言,蚁后的翅膀比工蜂大,但这两个种群有很大的重叠。而无人机的翅膀则明显更大。蚁后、工蜂和无人机的翅膀形状差异明显,可以用来可靠地区分它们。令人惊讶的是,工蜂的前翅形状与无人机的前翅形状比与蜂王的前翅形状更为相似。小蜂王与工蜂的相似程度并不比大蜂王高,而大工蜂与蜂王的相似程度也并不比小工蜂高。由于翅的大小与体重不同,不会在蜂王的一生中发生变化,因此可以用来评估蜂王一生的质量,而不仅仅是在蜂王出现后的短时间内。我们提供了大量蜂王和雄蜂的翅膀图像,可作为今后研究的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Size and Shape Differences in Fore Wings of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Queens, Workers and Drones
The three honey bee phenotypes - queens, workers, and drones differ in the size and shape of body parts. We used a large dataset to describe how the three phenotypes differed with regard to fore wings and applied the methodology of geometric morphometrics to measure the wings using the coordinates of nineteen landmarks. On average, queens had wings larger than workers, but the two castes had a broad overlap. Drones, on the other hand, had distinctly larger wings. Wing shape differed markedly among queens, workers and drones and can be used to reliably differentiate them from one other. Surprisingly, the fore wing shape of workers was more similar to that of drones than to that of queens. Small queens were not more similar to workers than large queens, and large workers were not more similar to queens than small workers. Because wing size, unlike body mass, does not change over the life of the queen, it can be used to evaluate the quality of a queen throughout its life and not only during a short period after emergence. We provide a large number of wing images of queens and drones, which can be used as a reference in future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Apicultural Science is a scientific, English-language journal that publishes both original research articles and review papers covering all aspects of the life of bees (superfamily Apoidea) and broadly defined apiculture. The main subject areas include: -bee biology- bee genetics- bee breeding- pathology and toxicology- pollination and bee botany- bee products- management, technologies, and economy- solitary bees and bumblebees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信