预谋杀人案中妨害司法行为人述评

Hasiholan Tua, Emilia Susanti
{"title":"预谋杀人案中妨害司法行为人述评","authors":"Hasiholan Tua, Emilia Susanti","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v5i03.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criminal responsibility is a reprehensible act by society that must be accounted to its maker for the actions committed. The problem in this study is how criminal accountability for perpetrators of obstruction of justice in premeditated murder cases and whether the sentences given to perpetrators have fulfilled the sense of substantive justice for the community (Review of Verdict Number: 806 / Pid, Sus / 2022 / PN Jkt Sel). The research method uses a normative juridical approach, the data used are secondary. The study conducted is a literature study. The resource person in this study is a Criminal Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung. This study aims to see in depth how criminal responsibility for perpetrators of criminal acts of persecution and whether the verdict given has fulfilled the sense of justice for the community, therefore the approach taken in this study is normative. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that after listening to witness statements and legal facts at the trial and based on the judge's consideration, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 (ten) months and a fine of Rp. 10,000,000 (ten million rupiah), because the elements have been legally and convincingly proven. In addition, Judgment No.: 806/Pid. Sus/2022/PN Jkt Sel has fulfilled the substantive sense of justice as the panel of judges has carefully considered and decided to issue this ruling.","PeriodicalId":500768,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Obstruction of Justice Perpetrators in Premeditated Murder Cases\",\"authors\":\"Hasiholan Tua, Emilia Susanti\",\"doi\":\"10.59141/jiss.v5i03.1041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Criminal responsibility is a reprehensible act by society that must be accounted to its maker for the actions committed. The problem in this study is how criminal accountability for perpetrators of obstruction of justice in premeditated murder cases and whether the sentences given to perpetrators have fulfilled the sense of substantive justice for the community (Review of Verdict Number: 806 / Pid, Sus / 2022 / PN Jkt Sel). The research method uses a normative juridical approach, the data used are secondary. The study conducted is a literature study. The resource person in this study is a Criminal Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung. This study aims to see in depth how criminal responsibility for perpetrators of criminal acts of persecution and whether the verdict given has fulfilled the sense of justice for the community, therefore the approach taken in this study is normative. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that after listening to witness statements and legal facts at the trial and based on the judge's consideration, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 (ten) months and a fine of Rp. 10,000,000 (ten million rupiah), because the elements have been legally and convincingly proven. In addition, Judgment No.: 806/Pid. Sus/2022/PN Jkt Sel has fulfilled the substantive sense of justice as the panel of judges has carefully considered and decided to issue this ruling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i03.1041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i03.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刑事责任是一种应受社会谴责的行为,必须对其制造者所实施的行为负责。本研究的问题是如何追究预谋杀人案件中妨害司法行为人的刑事责任,以及对行为人的判决是否实现了社会的实质正义感(判决书编号:806 / Pid, Sus / 2022 / PN Jkt Sel)。研究方法采用规范法学方法,使用的数据为二手数据。所进行的研究是一项文献研究。本研究的资料提供者是楠榜大学法学院的一名刑事讲师。本研究旨在深入探讨迫害犯罪行为人的刑事责任,以及判决是否符合社会的正义感,因此本研究采用的是规范法学方法。根据研究和讨论的结果,可以得出这样的结论:在庭审中听取证人陈述和法律事实后,根据法官的考虑,被告被判处 10 个月监禁和 10 000 000 印尼盾(1 000 万卢比)的罚款,因为这些要件已在法律上得到令人信服的证明。此外,第 806/Pid.此外,第 806/Pid. Sus/2022/PN Jkt Sel 号判决也符合实质意义上的司法公正,因为法官小组经过审慎考虑后决定做出这一裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Obstruction of Justice Perpetrators in Premeditated Murder Cases
Criminal responsibility is a reprehensible act by society that must be accounted to its maker for the actions committed. The problem in this study is how criminal accountability for perpetrators of obstruction of justice in premeditated murder cases and whether the sentences given to perpetrators have fulfilled the sense of substantive justice for the community (Review of Verdict Number: 806 / Pid, Sus / 2022 / PN Jkt Sel). The research method uses a normative juridical approach, the data used are secondary. The study conducted is a literature study. The resource person in this study is a Criminal Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung. This study aims to see in depth how criminal responsibility for perpetrators of criminal acts of persecution and whether the verdict given has fulfilled the sense of justice for the community, therefore the approach taken in this study is normative. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that after listening to witness statements and legal facts at the trial and based on the judge's consideration, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 (ten) months and a fine of Rp. 10,000,000 (ten million rupiah), because the elements have been legally and convincingly proven. In addition, Judgment No.: 806/Pid. Sus/2022/PN Jkt Sel has fulfilled the substantive sense of justice as the panel of judges has carefully considered and decided to issue this ruling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信