持续性疼痛患者使用哪些资源来帮助他们更好地了解自己的疼痛?横断面调查

Tenglong Xie, K. J. Chalmers, G. L. Moseley, S. Wallwork
{"title":"持续性疼痛患者使用哪些资源来帮助他们更好地了解自己的疼痛?横断面调查","authors":"Tenglong Xie, K. J. Chalmers, G. L. Moseley, S. Wallwork","doi":"10.1177/00178969241241214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pain education has been shown to reduce pain and disability in people with persistent pain by increasing their understanding of ‘how pain works’. There are many resources that people can engage with to help them learn about pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the resources with which people with persistent pain engage, to learn about pain. Secondary aims included investigating the helpfulness of those resources, whether people assess the quality of the resources with which they engage and whether the resources sought differed according to whether or not they had a diagnosis for their pain. Cross-sectional descriptive study. Online and paper-based surveys. People with persistent pain were recruited through advertising on social media and through local university health clinics. Participants completed a survey providing details about their pain condition, the resources with which they engaged to learn about pain, how useful they found these resources and whether they assessed the quality of the resources used. Data were collected from 127 online surveys (80% female; age [± SD] was 41 [±16] years). Healthcare professionals were the most common resource with which participants engaged (85.0%), followed by the Internet (68.5%) and scientific articles (52.8%). Books and scientific articles had the highest helpfulness rating; healthcare professionals and pamphlets had the lowest. Most respondents (85.3%) reported assessing the quality of the resources they engaged with. Despite being the most common resource participants engaged with, healthcare professionals were awarded some of the lowest helpfulness ratings. Care needs to be taken to ensure that people with persistent pain are directed towards learning resources that can provide helpful, relevant and evidence-based information.","PeriodicalId":504537,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"33 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What resources do people with persistent pain use to help them better understand their pain? A cross-sectional survey\",\"authors\":\"Tenglong Xie, K. J. Chalmers, G. L. Moseley, S. Wallwork\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00178969241241214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pain education has been shown to reduce pain and disability in people with persistent pain by increasing their understanding of ‘how pain works’. There are many resources that people can engage with to help them learn about pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the resources with which people with persistent pain engage, to learn about pain. Secondary aims included investigating the helpfulness of those resources, whether people assess the quality of the resources with which they engage and whether the resources sought differed according to whether or not they had a diagnosis for their pain. Cross-sectional descriptive study. Online and paper-based surveys. People with persistent pain were recruited through advertising on social media and through local university health clinics. Participants completed a survey providing details about their pain condition, the resources with which they engaged to learn about pain, how useful they found these resources and whether they assessed the quality of the resources used. Data were collected from 127 online surveys (80% female; age [± SD] was 41 [±16] years). Healthcare professionals were the most common resource with which participants engaged (85.0%), followed by the Internet (68.5%) and scientific articles (52.8%). Books and scientific articles had the highest helpfulness rating; healthcare professionals and pamphlets had the lowest. Most respondents (85.3%) reported assessing the quality of the resources they engaged with. Despite being the most common resource participants engaged with, healthcare professionals were awarded some of the lowest helpfulness ratings. Care needs to be taken to ensure that people with persistent pain are directed towards learning resources that can provide helpful, relevant and evidence-based information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969241241214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969241241214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,疼痛教育可以提高人们对 "疼痛是如何产生的 "的认识,从而减轻持续性疼痛患者的疼痛和残疾程度。人们可以利用许多资源来帮助自己了解疼痛。本研究的主要目的是调查持续性疼痛患者利用哪些资源来了解疼痛。次要目的包括调查这些资源是否有用,人们是否会评估他们所使用的资源的质量,以及所寻求的资源是否会因他们是否有疼痛诊断结果而有所不同。横断面描述性研究。在线调查和纸质调查。通过社交媒体广告和当地大学健康诊所招募持续性疼痛患者。参与者填写一份调查问卷,提供有关其疼痛状况的详细信息、他们为了解疼痛而使用的资源、他们认为这些资源有多有用以及他们是否对所使用资源的质量进行了评估。我们从 127 份在线调查中收集了数据(80% 为女性;年龄 [± SD] 为 41 [±16] 岁)。医护人员是参与者最常使用的资源(85.0%),其次是互联网(68.5%)和科学文章(52.8%)。书籍和科学文章的帮助程度最高;医疗保健专业人员和小册子的帮助程度最低。大多数受访者(85.3%)表示对所使用资源的质量进行了评估。尽管医疗保健专业人员是受访者最常使用的资源,但他们获得的有用性评分却最低。需要注意的是,要确保将持续性疼痛患者引向能够提供有用、相关和循证信息的学习资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What resources do people with persistent pain use to help them better understand their pain? A cross-sectional survey
Pain education has been shown to reduce pain and disability in people with persistent pain by increasing their understanding of ‘how pain works’. There are many resources that people can engage with to help them learn about pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the resources with which people with persistent pain engage, to learn about pain. Secondary aims included investigating the helpfulness of those resources, whether people assess the quality of the resources with which they engage and whether the resources sought differed according to whether or not they had a diagnosis for their pain. Cross-sectional descriptive study. Online and paper-based surveys. People with persistent pain were recruited through advertising on social media and through local university health clinics. Participants completed a survey providing details about their pain condition, the resources with which they engaged to learn about pain, how useful they found these resources and whether they assessed the quality of the resources used. Data were collected from 127 online surveys (80% female; age [± SD] was 41 [±16] years). Healthcare professionals were the most common resource with which participants engaged (85.0%), followed by the Internet (68.5%) and scientific articles (52.8%). Books and scientific articles had the highest helpfulness rating; healthcare professionals and pamphlets had the lowest. Most respondents (85.3%) reported assessing the quality of the resources they engaged with. Despite being the most common resource participants engaged with, healthcare professionals were awarded some of the lowest helpfulness ratings. Care needs to be taken to ensure that people with persistent pain are directed towards learning resources that can provide helpful, relevant and evidence-based information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信