针对特定任务的自然语言处理模型探索性分析

Q2 Mathematics
G. Shidaganti, Rithvik Shetty, Tharun Edara, Prashanth Srinivas, Sai Chandu Tammineni
{"title":"针对特定任务的自然语言处理模型探索性分析","authors":"G. Shidaganti, Rithvik Shetty, Tharun Edara, Prashanth Srinivas, Sai Chandu Tammineni","doi":"10.11591/eei.v13i2.6360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural language processing (NLP) is a technology that has become widespread in the area of human language understanding and analysis. A range of text processing tasks such as summarisation, semantic analysis, classification, question-answering, and natural language inference are commonly performed using it. The dilemma of picking a model to help us in our task is still there. It’s becoming an impediment. This is where we are trying to determine which modern NLP models are better suited for the tasks set out above in order to compare them with datasets like SQuAD and GLUE. For comparison, BERT, RoBERTa, distilBERT, BART, ALBERT, and text-to-text transfer transformer (T5) models have been used in this study. The aim is to understand the underlying architecture, its effects on the use case and also to understand where it falls short. Thus, we were able to observe that RoBERTa was more effective against the models ALBERT, distilBERT, and BERT in terms of tasks related to semantic analysis, natural language inference, and question-answering. The reason is due to the dynamic masking present in RoBERTa. For summarisation, even though BART and T5 models have very similar architecture the BART model has performed slightly better than the T5 model.","PeriodicalId":37619,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory analysis on the natural language processing models for task specific purposes\",\"authors\":\"G. Shidaganti, Rithvik Shetty, Tharun Edara, Prashanth Srinivas, Sai Chandu Tammineni\",\"doi\":\"10.11591/eei.v13i2.6360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Natural language processing (NLP) is a technology that has become widespread in the area of human language understanding and analysis. A range of text processing tasks such as summarisation, semantic analysis, classification, question-answering, and natural language inference are commonly performed using it. The dilemma of picking a model to help us in our task is still there. It’s becoming an impediment. This is where we are trying to determine which modern NLP models are better suited for the tasks set out above in order to compare them with datasets like SQuAD and GLUE. For comparison, BERT, RoBERTa, distilBERT, BART, ALBERT, and text-to-text transfer transformer (T5) models have been used in this study. The aim is to understand the underlying architecture, its effects on the use case and also to understand where it falls short. Thus, we were able to observe that RoBERTa was more effective against the models ALBERT, distilBERT, and BERT in terms of tasks related to semantic analysis, natural language inference, and question-answering. The reason is due to the dynamic masking present in RoBERTa. For summarisation, even though BART and T5 models have very similar architecture the BART model has performed slightly better than the T5 model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i2.6360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i2.6360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然语言处理(NLP)是一种在人类语言理解和分析领域得到广泛应用的技术。一系列文本处理任务,如摘要、语义分析、分类、问题解答和自然语言推理等,通常都使用它来完成。选择一个模型来帮助我们完成任务的难题依然存在。它正在成为一种障碍。因此,我们试图确定哪些现代 NLP 模型更适合上述任务,以便与 SQuAD 和 GLUE 等数据集进行比较。为了进行比较,本研究使用了 BERT、RoBERTa、distilBERT、BART、ALBERT 和文本到文本转换器 (T5) 模型。目的是了解底层架构、其对用例的影响以及不足之处。因此,我们可以观察到,在与语义分析、自然语言推理和问题解答相关的任务方面,RoBERTa 与 ALBERT、distilBERT 和 BERT 相比更加有效。原因在于 RoBERTa 中的动态屏蔽。在总结方面,尽管 BART 和 T5 模型的结构非常相似,但 BART 模型的表现略好于 T5 模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploratory analysis on the natural language processing models for task specific purposes
Natural language processing (NLP) is a technology that has become widespread in the area of human language understanding and analysis. A range of text processing tasks such as summarisation, semantic analysis, classification, question-answering, and natural language inference are commonly performed using it. The dilemma of picking a model to help us in our task is still there. It’s becoming an impediment. This is where we are trying to determine which modern NLP models are better suited for the tasks set out above in order to compare them with datasets like SQuAD and GLUE. For comparison, BERT, RoBERTa, distilBERT, BART, ALBERT, and text-to-text transfer transformer (T5) models have been used in this study. The aim is to understand the underlying architecture, its effects on the use case and also to understand where it falls short. Thus, we were able to observe that RoBERTa was more effective against the models ALBERT, distilBERT, and BERT in terms of tasks related to semantic analysis, natural language inference, and question-answering. The reason is due to the dynamic masking present in RoBERTa. For summarisation, even though BART and T5 models have very similar architecture the BART model has performed slightly better than the T5 model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics publishes original papers in the field of electrical, computer and informatics engineering which covers, but not limited to, the following scope: Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Informatics[...] Electronics[...] Electrical and Power Engineering[...] Telecommunication and Information Technology[...]Instrumentation and Control Engineering[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信