通用艺术教学法与设计逻辑

Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.5406/15437809.58.1.06

Edward R. O'Neill

{"title":"通用艺术教学法与设计逻辑","authors":"Edward R. O'Neill","doi":"10.5406/15437809.58.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n For almost 300 years, five different art forms have used the same instructional method. This Common Arts Instructional Method (CAIM) can be explained using a variety of theories. The CAIM also offers the opportunity to understand instructional methods under the banner of design: instances of types rather than applications of laws or principles. The differences between theory and design are explored, and some recommendations are offered for striking new instances of this common type.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"58 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Common Arts Instructional Method and the Logic of Design\",\"authors\":\"Edward R. O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/15437809.58.1.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n For almost 300 years, five different art forms have used the same instructional method. This Common Arts Instructional Method (CAIM) can be explained using a variety of theories. The CAIM also offers the opportunity to understand instructional methods under the banner of design: instances of types rather than applications of laws or principles. The differences between theory and design are explored, and some recommendations are offered for striking new instances of this common type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"58 43\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/15437809.58.1.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/15437809.58.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

近 300 年来，五种不同的艺术形式使用了相同的教学方法。这种共同艺术教学法（CAIM）可以用多种理论来解释。共同艺术教学法还提供了在设计的旗帜下理解教学方法的机会：类型的实例，而不是法则或原则的应用。我们探讨了理论与设计之间的差异，并为这一常见类型的新实例提供了一些建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

A Common Arts Instructional Method and the Logic of Design

For almost 300 years, five different art forms have used the same instructional method. This Common Arts Instructional Method (CAIM) can be explained using a variety of theories. The CAIM also offers the opportunity to understand instructional methods under the banner of design: instances of types rather than applications of laws or principles. The differences between theory and design are explored, and some recommendations are offered for striking new instances of this common type.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助