{"title":"\"异类即经典\":威廉-卡洛斯-威廉斯与文学史","authors":"Anne L. Cavender","doi":"10.5406/15437809.58.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The “classic” is a vexed term in the work of William Carlos Williams. He uses the category to describe both the stale classicism of T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound and, conversely, the authentic, “aberrant” classic of James Joyce and surrealism. Analyzing unpublished archival manuscripts alongside the posthumously published collection of essays, The Embodiment of Knowledge, I approach the classic through Williams's theories of pedagogy. Williams parodies and rejects academic modes of reading that cling to the “malignant rigidities” of the past. Yet Paterson and The Embodiment also theorize the reader's interpretive power to disrupt any homogenizing conformity latent in the literary tradition. This dissonant hermeneutics can recuperate the classics and represents a form of resistance to a binary logic of past versus present, or European versus American literature.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"22 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Aberrant Is the Classic”: William Carlos Williams and Literary History\",\"authors\":\"Anne L. Cavender\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/15437809.58.1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The “classic” is a vexed term in the work of William Carlos Williams. He uses the category to describe both the stale classicism of T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound and, conversely, the authentic, “aberrant” classic of James Joyce and surrealism. Analyzing unpublished archival manuscripts alongside the posthumously published collection of essays, The Embodiment of Knowledge, I approach the classic through Williams's theories of pedagogy. Williams parodies and rejects academic modes of reading that cling to the “malignant rigidities” of the past. Yet Paterson and The Embodiment also theorize the reader's interpretive power to disrupt any homogenizing conformity latent in the literary tradition. This dissonant hermeneutics can recuperate the classics and represents a form of resistance to a binary logic of past versus present, or European versus American literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"22 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/15437809.58.1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/15437809.58.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在威廉-卡洛斯-威廉斯的作品中,"经典 "是一个令人困扰的术语。他用这个词来形容艾略特(T. S. Eliot)和埃兹拉-庞德(Ezra Pound)的陈腐古典主义,反之,他也用这个词来形容詹姆斯-乔伊斯(James Joyce)和超现实主义的真实、"反常 "的古典主义。通过分析未发表的档案手稿以及死后出版的论文集《知识的化身》,我通过威廉斯的教育学理论来探讨这部经典。威廉斯嘲弄并摒弃了固守过去 "恶性僵化 "的学术阅读模式。然而,《帕特森》和《化身》也从理论上阐明了读者的阐释能力,可以打破文学传统中潜藏的同质化一致性。这种不和谐的诠释学可以重拾经典,是对过去与现在、欧洲文学与美国文学二元逻辑的一种抵抗。
“The Aberrant Is the Classic”: William Carlos Williams and Literary History
The “classic” is a vexed term in the work of William Carlos Williams. He uses the category to describe both the stale classicism of T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound and, conversely, the authentic, “aberrant” classic of James Joyce and surrealism. Analyzing unpublished archival manuscripts alongside the posthumously published collection of essays, The Embodiment of Knowledge, I approach the classic through Williams's theories of pedagogy. Williams parodies and rejects academic modes of reading that cling to the “malignant rigidities” of the past. Yet Paterson and The Embodiment also theorize the reader's interpretive power to disrupt any homogenizing conformity latent in the literary tradition. This dissonant hermeneutics can recuperate the classics and represents a form of resistance to a binary logic of past versus present, or European versus American literature.