Binseng Wang, Torgeir Rui, Scott Skinner, Morgan Ayers-Comegys, Jason Gibson, Steve Williams
{"title":"医疗设备老化","authors":"Binseng Wang, Torgeir Rui, Scott Skinner, Morgan Ayers-Comegys, Jason Gibson, Steve Williams","doi":"10.1097/jce.0000000000000644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been long assumed that medical equipment deteriorates gradually with time (also known as wear-out or aging) like industrial equipment or human beings. An analysis of approximately 342 000 pieces of medical equipment managed for 30+ years by a single service provider shows this hypothesis is not always true. Some equipment will exhibit aging, whereas others can be deployed until a catastrophic event occurs and replacement is preferable than repair considering costs, downtimes, and/or technical/clinical innovations. Such knowledge can help to determine the best maintenance strategy for each type or even brand/model of equipment, as well as to optimize replacement planning, instead of blindly following recommendations made by manufacturers and/or age-based replacements often suggested by consultants. The first of this series of 3 articles presents the aging impact on maintenance, whereas the second one analyzes the impact on equipment lifespan. The final article reviews the root causes of aging and presents a simple, intuitive aging model that can be used for both maintenance and replacement plannings without having to analyze individual equipment types or individual brands and models in a comprehensive manner.","PeriodicalId":77198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical engineering","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Equipment Aging\",\"authors\":\"Binseng Wang, Torgeir Rui, Scott Skinner, Morgan Ayers-Comegys, Jason Gibson, Steve Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jce.0000000000000644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has been long assumed that medical equipment deteriorates gradually with time (also known as wear-out or aging) like industrial equipment or human beings. An analysis of approximately 342 000 pieces of medical equipment managed for 30+ years by a single service provider shows this hypothesis is not always true. Some equipment will exhibit aging, whereas others can be deployed until a catastrophic event occurs and replacement is preferable than repair considering costs, downtimes, and/or technical/clinical innovations. Such knowledge can help to determine the best maintenance strategy for each type or even brand/model of equipment, as well as to optimize replacement planning, instead of blindly following recommendations made by manufacturers and/or age-based replacements often suggested by consultants. The first of this series of 3 articles presents the aging impact on maintenance, whereas the second one analyzes the impact on equipment lifespan. The final article reviews the root causes of aging and presents a simple, intuitive aging model that can be used for both maintenance and replacement plannings without having to analyze individual equipment types or individual brands and models in a comprehensive manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical engineering\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jce.0000000000000644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jce.0000000000000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It has been long assumed that medical equipment deteriorates gradually with time (also known as wear-out or aging) like industrial equipment or human beings. An analysis of approximately 342 000 pieces of medical equipment managed for 30+ years by a single service provider shows this hypothesis is not always true. Some equipment will exhibit aging, whereas others can be deployed until a catastrophic event occurs and replacement is preferable than repair considering costs, downtimes, and/or technical/clinical innovations. Such knowledge can help to determine the best maintenance strategy for each type or even brand/model of equipment, as well as to optimize replacement planning, instead of blindly following recommendations made by manufacturers and/or age-based replacements often suggested by consultants. The first of this series of 3 articles presents the aging impact on maintenance, whereas the second one analyzes the impact on equipment lifespan. The final article reviews the root causes of aging and presents a simple, intuitive aging model that can be used for both maintenance and replacement plannings without having to analyze individual equipment types or individual brands and models in a comprehensive manner.