在本科医学教育的 "基于问题的学习 "活动中,教师对其辅导员角色的看法

I. Sunarno, Budu Mannyu, Suryani As’ad, Sri Asriyani, Irawan Yusuf, Rina Masadah, Agussalim Bukhari
{"title":"在本科医学教育的 \"基于问题的学习 \"活动中,教师对其辅导员角色的看法","authors":"I. Sunarno, Budu Mannyu, Suryani As’ad, Sri Asriyani, Irawan Yusuf, Rina Masadah, Agussalim Bukhari","doi":"10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/sc3114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The study aimed to ascertain how the faculty at the Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University perceived their role as a tutor during a problem-based learning activity during the academic phase of medical education, based on the length of time they acted as a tutor.\nMethods: This was prospective observational research with an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, which was performed at the Undergraduate Medical Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, from January 2023 until May 2023. Research subjects were divided into two groups: a) the Novice group and b) the Expert group. Quantitative data were collected by giving a questionnaire containing six categories with 35 questions and distributed by Google form. An independent t-test was used to compare the faculty’s perception, with a p-value <.05 significant. Followed by Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for qualitative data, which then were analysed by thematic analysis. The last stage is integrating quantitative and qualitative data.\nResults: There were statistically significant differences in seven issues between the two groups. Most of the tutors in both groups had favorable opinions, except for the expert group's disagreement with the passive role of the tutor in the tutorial group. Eight positive and twelve negative perceptions were found in the FGD.\nConclusion: Most tutors positively perceived their role in PBL, with the expert group having more dependable opinions and well-reasoned suggestions.\n\nKeywords: Problem-Based Learning, Undergraduate Medical Education, Focus Group Discussion","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty’s perception of their role as a tutor during Problem-Based Learning activity in undergraduate medical education\",\"authors\":\"I. Sunarno, Budu Mannyu, Suryani As’ad, Sri Asriyani, Irawan Yusuf, Rina Masadah, Agussalim Bukhari\",\"doi\":\"10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/sc3114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The study aimed to ascertain how the faculty at the Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University perceived their role as a tutor during a problem-based learning activity during the academic phase of medical education, based on the length of time they acted as a tutor.\\nMethods: This was prospective observational research with an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, which was performed at the Undergraduate Medical Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, from January 2023 until May 2023. Research subjects were divided into two groups: a) the Novice group and b) the Expert group. Quantitative data were collected by giving a questionnaire containing six categories with 35 questions and distributed by Google form. An independent t-test was used to compare the faculty’s perception, with a p-value <.05 significant. Followed by Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for qualitative data, which then were analysed by thematic analysis. The last stage is integrating quantitative and qualitative data.\\nResults: There were statistically significant differences in seven issues between the two groups. Most of the tutors in both groups had favorable opinions, except for the expert group's disagreement with the passive role of the tutor in the tutorial group. Eight positive and twelve negative perceptions were found in the FGD.\\nConclusion: Most tutors positively perceived their role in PBL, with the expert group having more dependable opinions and well-reasoned suggestions.\\n\\nKeywords: Problem-Based Learning, Undergraduate Medical Education, Focus Group Discussion\",\"PeriodicalId\":494652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/sc3114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/sc3114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究旨在了解哈桑努丁大学医学院的教师在医学教育的学术阶段如何看待他们在基于问题的学习活动中作为导师的角色,这取决于他们担任导师的时间长短:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,采用解释性顺序混合方法设计,于2023年1月至2023年5月在哈桑努丁大学医学院医学本科学习项目中进行。研究对象分为两组:a) 新手组和 b) 专家组。定量数据通过谷歌表格发放的问卷收集,问卷包含六大类 35 个问题。采用独立的 t 检验来比较教师的看法,P 值小于 0.05 为显著。随后,通过焦点小组讨论(FGD)获得定性数据,并通过专题分析对这些数据进行分析。最后一个阶段是整合定量和定性数据:两组辅导员在七个问题上存在明显的统计学差异。除了专家组不同意辅导员在辅导小组中的被动角色外,两组的大多数辅导员都持赞成意见。在 FGD 中发现了 8 种积极看法和 12 种消极看法:结论:大多数辅导员对自己在 PBL 中的角色持积极看法,专家组的意见更可靠,建议更合理:基于问题的学习 本科医学教育 焦点小组讨论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faculty’s perception of their role as a tutor during Problem-Based Learning activity in undergraduate medical education
Introduction: The study aimed to ascertain how the faculty at the Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University perceived their role as a tutor during a problem-based learning activity during the academic phase of medical education, based on the length of time they acted as a tutor. Methods: This was prospective observational research with an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, which was performed at the Undergraduate Medical Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, from January 2023 until May 2023. Research subjects were divided into two groups: a) the Novice group and b) the Expert group. Quantitative data were collected by giving a questionnaire containing six categories with 35 questions and distributed by Google form. An independent t-test was used to compare the faculty’s perception, with a p-value <.05 significant. Followed by Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for qualitative data, which then were analysed by thematic analysis. The last stage is integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Results: There were statistically significant differences in seven issues between the two groups. Most of the tutors in both groups had favorable opinions, except for the expert group's disagreement with the passive role of the tutor in the tutorial group. Eight positive and twelve negative perceptions were found in the FGD. Conclusion: Most tutors positively perceived their role in PBL, with the expert group having more dependable opinions and well-reasoned suggestions. Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Undergraduate Medical Education, Focus Group Discussion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信