基于吉布斯熵模型的乐观-悲观博弈交叉效率法,用于决策单元排序

Q2 Mathematics
Noppakun Thongmual, Chanchai Laoha, Narong Wichapa
{"title":"基于吉布斯熵模型的乐观-悲观博弈交叉效率法,用于决策单元排序","authors":"Noppakun Thongmual, Chanchai Laoha, Narong Wichapa","doi":"10.11591/eei.v13i2.5747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The game cross-efficiency method, a commonly utilized approach for ranking decision-making units in tie-breaking scenarios, is based on secondary goals. However, in certain data envelopment analysis ranking problems, the classical game cross-efficiency method may fail to differentiate all decision-making units effectively. To address this limitation, it is prudent to explore the development of a new method that can enhance the ranking performance of the classical game cross-efficiency approach. In this study, we propose a novel Gibbs entropy linear programming model that integrates both optimistic and pessimistic perspectives of the classical game cross-efficiency method for data envelopment analysis ranking problems. To validate the reliability and utility of our proposed method, we present three examples: the six nursing homes problem, numerical example 2, and an application involving twenty Thai provinces with cash crop data. The reliability of the proposed method is assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) on the numerical examples. The results demonstrate that the rs values for both the proposed method and the classical game crossefficiency method, specifically for the six nursing homes problem, numerical example 2, and the application involving twenty Thai provinces, are determined to be rs=0.998, 0.998, and 0.986 respectively.","PeriodicalId":37619,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimistic-pessimistic game cross-efficiency method based on a Gibbs entropy model for ranking decision making units\",\"authors\":\"Noppakun Thongmual, Chanchai Laoha, Narong Wichapa\",\"doi\":\"10.11591/eei.v13i2.5747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The game cross-efficiency method, a commonly utilized approach for ranking decision-making units in tie-breaking scenarios, is based on secondary goals. However, in certain data envelopment analysis ranking problems, the classical game cross-efficiency method may fail to differentiate all decision-making units effectively. To address this limitation, it is prudent to explore the development of a new method that can enhance the ranking performance of the classical game cross-efficiency approach. In this study, we propose a novel Gibbs entropy linear programming model that integrates both optimistic and pessimistic perspectives of the classical game cross-efficiency method for data envelopment analysis ranking problems. To validate the reliability and utility of our proposed method, we present three examples: the six nursing homes problem, numerical example 2, and an application involving twenty Thai provinces with cash crop data. The reliability of the proposed method is assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) on the numerical examples. The results demonstrate that the rs values for both the proposed method and the classical game crossefficiency method, specifically for the six nursing homes problem, numerical example 2, and the application involving twenty Thai provinces, are determined to be rs=0.998, 0.998, and 0.986 respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i2.5747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i2.5747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

博弈交叉效率法是一种在决胜局中对决策单元进行排序的常用方法,它以次要目标为基础。然而,在某些数据包络分析排序问题中,经典的博弈交叉效率法可能无法有效区分所有决策单元。为了解决这一局限性,探索开发一种能提高经典博弈交叉效率法排序性能的新方法是明智之举。在本研究中,我们提出了一种新的吉布斯熵线性规划模型,该模型综合了经典博弈交叉效率法的乐观和悲观观点,适用于数据包络分析排序问题。为了验证所提方法的可靠性和实用性,我们列举了三个实例:六个养老院问题、数字实例 2 以及涉及泰国二十个府经济作物数据的应用。我们利用数值示例中的斯皮尔曼相关系数(rs)评估了所提方法的可靠性。结果表明,具体到六个养老院问题、数字示例 2 和涉及泰国 20 个府的应用,建议方法和经典博弈交叉效率方法的 rs 值分别为 rs=0.998、0.998 和 0.986。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An optimistic-pessimistic game cross-efficiency method based on a Gibbs entropy model for ranking decision making units
The game cross-efficiency method, a commonly utilized approach for ranking decision-making units in tie-breaking scenarios, is based on secondary goals. However, in certain data envelopment analysis ranking problems, the classical game cross-efficiency method may fail to differentiate all decision-making units effectively. To address this limitation, it is prudent to explore the development of a new method that can enhance the ranking performance of the classical game cross-efficiency approach. In this study, we propose a novel Gibbs entropy linear programming model that integrates both optimistic and pessimistic perspectives of the classical game cross-efficiency method for data envelopment analysis ranking problems. To validate the reliability and utility of our proposed method, we present three examples: the six nursing homes problem, numerical example 2, and an application involving twenty Thai provinces with cash crop data. The reliability of the proposed method is assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) on the numerical examples. The results demonstrate that the rs values for both the proposed method and the classical game crossefficiency method, specifically for the six nursing homes problem, numerical example 2, and the application involving twenty Thai provinces, are determined to be rs=0.998, 0.998, and 0.986 respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics publishes original papers in the field of electrical, computer and informatics engineering which covers, but not limited to, the following scope: Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Informatics[...] Electronics[...] Electrical and Power Engineering[...] Telecommunication and Information Technology[...]Instrumentation and Control Engineering[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信