在可持续生产中更多使用低风险植保产品的挑战与机遇。综述

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Åsa Lankinen, Johanna Witzell, Kristin Aleklett, Sara Furenhed, Kristina Karlsson Green, Meike Latz, Erland Liljeroth, Rebecca Larsson, Klara Löfkvist, Johan Meijer, Audrius Menkis, Velemir Ninkovic, Åke Olson, Laura Grenville-Briggs
{"title":"在可持续生产中更多使用低风险植保产品的挑战与机遇。综述","authors":"Åsa Lankinen,&nbsp;Johanna Witzell,&nbsp;Kristin Aleklett,&nbsp;Sara Furenhed,&nbsp;Kristina Karlsson Green,&nbsp;Meike Latz,&nbsp;Erland Liljeroth,&nbsp;Rebecca Larsson,&nbsp;Klara Löfkvist,&nbsp;Johan Meijer,&nbsp;Audrius Menkis,&nbsp;Velemir Ninkovic,&nbsp;Åke Olson,&nbsp;Laura Grenville-Briggs","doi":"10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plant production systems worldwide are struggling to meet the diverse and increasing needs of humankind while also facing challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This, combined with the desirable transition from the use of conventional pesticides to more sustainable plant protection solutions, has led to an urgent, and increasing, need for low-risk plant protection products (PPPs) to be developed, applied, and integrated into management practices across all types of plant production systems. Despite a high demand from end users and consumers together with joint political goals at the EU level to replace conventional pesticides, the number of low-risk PPPs on the European market remains low, in comparison to synthetic agrochemicals. In this review, we summarize knowledge about the policy, technical, and administrative issues hampering the process of bringing new low-risk PPPs to the European market. We present an overview of the challenges in using the low-risk PPPs that are currently available within the EU agricultural, horticultural, and forestry sectors. We describe the variation in modes of action and the limitations associated with different application techniques and give concrete examples of problems and solutions from Swedish plant production sectors, in contrast to global perspectives as demonstrated by examples from African agriculture. Finally, we conclude that trans-sectoral, multi-actor approaches are required and provide suggestions on how to address the remaining knowledge gaps related to efficiency, application, and economics of low-risk PPP use in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) solutions for plant protection to improve future food security in Europe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and opportunities for increasing the use of low-risk plant protection products in sustainable production. A review\",\"authors\":\"Åsa Lankinen,&nbsp;Johanna Witzell,&nbsp;Kristin Aleklett,&nbsp;Sara Furenhed,&nbsp;Kristina Karlsson Green,&nbsp;Meike Latz,&nbsp;Erland Liljeroth,&nbsp;Rebecca Larsson,&nbsp;Klara Löfkvist,&nbsp;Johan Meijer,&nbsp;Audrius Menkis,&nbsp;Velemir Ninkovic,&nbsp;Åke Olson,&nbsp;Laura Grenville-Briggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Plant production systems worldwide are struggling to meet the diverse and increasing needs of humankind while also facing challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This, combined with the desirable transition from the use of conventional pesticides to more sustainable plant protection solutions, has led to an urgent, and increasing, need for low-risk plant protection products (PPPs) to be developed, applied, and integrated into management practices across all types of plant production systems. Despite a high demand from end users and consumers together with joint political goals at the EU level to replace conventional pesticides, the number of low-risk PPPs on the European market remains low, in comparison to synthetic agrochemicals. In this review, we summarize knowledge about the policy, technical, and administrative issues hampering the process of bringing new low-risk PPPs to the European market. We present an overview of the challenges in using the low-risk PPPs that are currently available within the EU agricultural, horticultural, and forestry sectors. We describe the variation in modes of action and the limitations associated with different application techniques and give concrete examples of problems and solutions from Swedish plant production sectors, in contrast to global perspectives as demonstrated by examples from African agriculture. Finally, we conclude that trans-sectoral, multi-actor approaches are required and provide suggestions on how to address the remaining knowledge gaps related to efficiency, application, and economics of low-risk PPP use in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) solutions for plant protection to improve future food security in Europe.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界的植物生产系统都在努力满足人类日益增长的多样化需求,同时也面临着气候变化和生物多样性丧失等挑战。加之人们希望从使用传统杀虫剂过渡到更可持续的植保解决方案,这就迫切需要开发、应用低风险植保产品(PPPs),并将其纳入各类植物生产系统的管理实践中。尽管最终用户和消费者对低风险植保产品有很高的需求,欧盟层面也有取代传统农药的共同政治目标,但与合成农用化学品相比,欧洲市场上低风险植保产品的数量仍然很少。在本综述中,我们总结了阻碍新的低风险购买力平价农药进入欧洲市场的政策、技术和管理问题。我们概述了目前欧盟农业、园艺和林业部门在使用低风险购买力平价产品时面临的挑战。我们描述了与不同应用技术相关的作用模式差异和局限性,并举例说明了瑞典植物生产部门存在的问题和解决方案,而非洲农业部门的实例则展示了全球视角。最后,我们得出结论,需要跨部门、多因素的方法,并就如何解决植物保护综合害虫管理 (IPM) 解决方案中低风险 PPP 使用的效率、应用和经济性方面的知识差距提出建议,以提高欧洲未来的粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Challenges and opportunities for increasing the use of low-risk plant protection products in sustainable production. A review

Challenges and opportunities for increasing the use of low-risk plant protection products in sustainable production. A review

Plant production systems worldwide are struggling to meet the diverse and increasing needs of humankind while also facing challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This, combined with the desirable transition from the use of conventional pesticides to more sustainable plant protection solutions, has led to an urgent, and increasing, need for low-risk plant protection products (PPPs) to be developed, applied, and integrated into management practices across all types of plant production systems. Despite a high demand from end users and consumers together with joint political goals at the EU level to replace conventional pesticides, the number of low-risk PPPs on the European market remains low, in comparison to synthetic agrochemicals. In this review, we summarize knowledge about the policy, technical, and administrative issues hampering the process of bringing new low-risk PPPs to the European market. We present an overview of the challenges in using the low-risk PPPs that are currently available within the EU agricultural, horticultural, and forestry sectors. We describe the variation in modes of action and the limitations associated with different application techniques and give concrete examples of problems and solutions from Swedish plant production sectors, in contrast to global perspectives as demonstrated by examples from African agriculture. Finally, we conclude that trans-sectoral, multi-actor approaches are required and provide suggestions on how to address the remaining knowledge gaps related to efficiency, application, and economics of low-risk PPP use in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) solutions for plant protection to improve future food security in Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信