坦桑尼亚北部高危男性的前列腺癌知识和筛查障碍:一项基于社区的研究

Q3 Medicine
Bartholomeo Nicholaus Ngowi , Alex Mremi , Orgeness Jasper Mbwambo , Modesta Paschal Mitao , Mramba Nyindo , Kien Alfred Mteta , Blandina Theophil Mmbaga
{"title":"坦桑尼亚北部高危男性的前列腺癌知识和筛查障碍:一项基于社区的研究","authors":"Bartholomeo Nicholaus Ngowi ,&nbsp;Alex Mremi ,&nbsp;Orgeness Jasper Mbwambo ,&nbsp;Modesta Paschal Mitao ,&nbsp;Mramba Nyindo ,&nbsp;Kien Alfred Mteta ,&nbsp;Blandina Theophil Mmbaga","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although prostate cancer (Pca) screening plays important role in early diagnosis and reduction of mortality, Tanzanian men are relatively unscreened. We aimed to investigate Pca knowledge level and barriers to screening among at-risk men in northern Tanzania.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This community-based survey was conducted in northern Tanzania from May to September 2022, involving men age ≥40 years. Participants were invited by announcing in local churches, mosques, brochures, and social media groups. Participants attended a nearby health facility where survey questionnaires were administered. Knowledge level was measured on the Likert scale and scored as poor (&lt;50 %) or good (≥50 %).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 6205 men with a mean age of 60.23 ± 10.98 years were enrolled in the study. Of these, 586 (9.5 %) had ever been screened for Pca. Overall, 1263 men (20.4 %) had good knowledge of Pca. Having health insurance, knowing at least 1 risk factor or symptoms of Pca, and hospital as the source of Pca information were significantly associated with ever being screened. The most common reasons for not being screened were a belief that they are healthy (<em>n</em> = 2983; 53.1 %), that Pca is not a serious disease (<em>n</em> = 3908; 69.6 %), and that digital rectal examination (DRE) as an embarrassing (<em>n</em> = 3634; 64.7 %) or harmful (<em>n</em> = 3047; 54.3 %) procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Having Pca knowledge, health insurance and hospital source of information were correlated with increased screening. False beliefs about DRE and the seriousness of Pca had negative effects on screening. Increasing community knowledge and universal health coverage would improve uptake of Pca screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000236/pdfft?md5=278085955eb28f5b88051eb990ce9c00&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate cancer knowledge and barriers to screening among men at risk in northern Tanzania: A community-based study\",\"authors\":\"Bartholomeo Nicholaus Ngowi ,&nbsp;Alex Mremi ,&nbsp;Orgeness Jasper Mbwambo ,&nbsp;Modesta Paschal Mitao ,&nbsp;Mramba Nyindo ,&nbsp;Kien Alfred Mteta ,&nbsp;Blandina Theophil Mmbaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although prostate cancer (Pca) screening plays important role in early diagnosis and reduction of mortality, Tanzanian men are relatively unscreened. We aimed to investigate Pca knowledge level and barriers to screening among at-risk men in northern Tanzania.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This community-based survey was conducted in northern Tanzania from May to September 2022, involving men age ≥40 years. Participants were invited by announcing in local churches, mosques, brochures, and social media groups. Participants attended a nearby health facility where survey questionnaires were administered. Knowledge level was measured on the Likert scale and scored as poor (&lt;50 %) or good (≥50 %).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 6205 men with a mean age of 60.23 ± 10.98 years were enrolled in the study. Of these, 586 (9.5 %) had ever been screened for Pca. Overall, 1263 men (20.4 %) had good knowledge of Pca. Having health insurance, knowing at least 1 risk factor or symptoms of Pca, and hospital as the source of Pca information were significantly associated with ever being screened. The most common reasons for not being screened were a belief that they are healthy (<em>n</em> = 2983; 53.1 %), that Pca is not a serious disease (<em>n</em> = 3908; 69.6 %), and that digital rectal examination (DRE) as an embarrassing (<em>n</em> = 3634; 64.7 %) or harmful (<em>n</em> = 3047; 54.3 %) procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Having Pca knowledge, health insurance and hospital source of information were correlated with increased screening. False beliefs about DRE and the seriousness of Pca had negative effects on screening. Increasing community knowledge and universal health coverage would improve uptake of Pca screening.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000236/pdfft?md5=278085955eb28f5b88051eb990ce9c00&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000236-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然前列腺癌(Pca)筛查在早期诊断和降低死亡率方面发挥着重要作用,但坦桑尼亚男性仍相对缺乏筛查。我们的目的是调查坦桑尼亚北部高危男性的前列腺癌知识水平和筛查障碍。通过在当地教堂、清真寺、宣传册和社交媒体群组中发布公告的方式邀请参与者。参与者到附近的医疗机构接受调查问卷。知识水平采用李克特量表进行测量,分为差(<50 %)或好(≥50 %)。结果共有 6205 名男性参加了研究,平均年龄为 60.23 ± 10.98 岁。其中 586 人(9.5%)曾接受过白血病筛查。总体而言,1263 名男性(20.4%)对 Pca 有较好的了解。拥有医疗保险、知道至少一种前列腺癌的风险因素或症状以及医院是前列腺癌信息的来源与是否接受过筛查有很大关系。不接受筛查的最常见原因是认为自己很健康(n = 2983;53.1%),认为 Pca 不是一种严重的疾病(n = 3908;69.6%),以及认为数字直肠检查(DRE)是一种令人尴尬的检查(n = 3634;64.7%)或有害的检查(n = 3047;54.3%)。对 DRE 和 Pca 严重性的错误认识对筛查有负面影响。增加社区知识和普及医疗保险将提高 Pca 筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prostate cancer knowledge and barriers to screening among men at risk in northern Tanzania: A community-based study

Background

Although prostate cancer (Pca) screening plays important role in early diagnosis and reduction of mortality, Tanzanian men are relatively unscreened. We aimed to investigate Pca knowledge level and barriers to screening among at-risk men in northern Tanzania.

Methods

This community-based survey was conducted in northern Tanzania from May to September 2022, involving men age ≥40 years. Participants were invited by announcing in local churches, mosques, brochures, and social media groups. Participants attended a nearby health facility where survey questionnaires were administered. Knowledge level was measured on the Likert scale and scored as poor (<50 %) or good (≥50 %).

Results

A total of 6205 men with a mean age of 60.23 ± 10.98 years were enrolled in the study. Of these, 586 (9.5 %) had ever been screened for Pca. Overall, 1263 men (20.4 %) had good knowledge of Pca. Having health insurance, knowing at least 1 risk factor or symptoms of Pca, and hospital as the source of Pca information were significantly associated with ever being screened. The most common reasons for not being screened were a belief that they are healthy (n = 2983; 53.1 %), that Pca is not a serious disease (n = 3908; 69.6 %), and that digital rectal examination (DRE) as an embarrassing (n = 3634; 64.7 %) or harmful (n = 3047; 54.3 %) procedure.

Conclusion

Having Pca knowledge, health insurance and hospital source of information were correlated with increased screening. False beliefs about DRE and the seriousness of Pca had negative effects on screening. Increasing community knowledge and universal health coverage would improve uptake of Pca screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信