远程康复对骨科手术后功能恢复的有效性:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2024-03-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2023.0057
Mattia Morri, Riccardo Ruisi, Antonio Culcasi, Vincenzo Peccerillo
{"title":"远程康复对骨科手术后功能恢复的有效性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Mattia Morri, Riccardo Ruisi, Antonio Culcasi, Vincenzo Peccerillo","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy treatment provided remotely via the Internet in the postoperative treatment of orthopedic patients and compare it with standard physiotherapy (face-to-face treatment or home-based treatment) in terms of motor performance, pain symptoms, and functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database; EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINHAL was conducted. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias (ROB) assessment using Cochrane ROB 2 tools, and summarize the results by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trial were selected. Pooled results showed improvement in motor performance in favor of the telerehabilitation group at 4-6 weeks (standardized mean difference -0.24, 95% confidence interval -0.45, -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and these differences were close to the minimum clinically important difference for Time Up and Go test. For pain and functional recovery, the results showed differences not statistically important. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For joint replacement patients, treatment conducted via telerehabilitation appears able to provide levels of motor performance better to that achieved through home-based treatment. In contrast, conclusive evidence that telerehabilitation is comparable to standard face-to-face treatment are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation for Functional Recovery After Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Morri, Riccardo Ruisi, Antonio Culcasi, Vincenzo Peccerillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2023.0057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy treatment provided remotely via the Internet in the postoperative treatment of orthopedic patients and compare it with standard physiotherapy (face-to-face treatment or home-based treatment) in terms of motor performance, pain symptoms, and functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database; EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINHAL was conducted. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias (ROB) assessment using Cochrane ROB 2 tools, and summarize the results by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trial were selected. Pooled results showed improvement in motor performance in favor of the telerehabilitation group at 4-6 weeks (standardized mean difference -0.24, 95% confidence interval -0.45, -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and these differences were close to the minimum clinically important difference for Time Up and Go test. For pain and functional recovery, the results showed differences not statistically important. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For joint replacement patients, treatment conducted via telerehabilitation appears able to provide levels of motor performance better to that achieved through home-based treatment. In contrast, conclusive evidence that telerehabilitation is comparable to standard face-to-face treatment are not available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"78-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979691/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统综述旨在评估通过互联网远程提供的物理治疗在骨科患者术后治疗中的有效性,并将其与标准物理治疗(面对面治疗或在家治疗)在运动表现、疼痛症状和功能恢复方面进行比较:方法:对 MEDLINE、物理治疗证据数据库、EMBASE、SCOPUS 和 CINHAL 进行了系统检索。两名独立审稿人使用 Cochrane ROB 2 工具进行了研究筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估,并通过建议分级评估、发展和评价对结果进行了总结:结果:共选取了 11 项随机对照试验。汇总结果显示,4-6周时,远程康复组的运动表现有所改善(标准化平均差异为-0.24,95%置信区间为-0.45,-0.02,P = 0.03),这些差异接近于 "时间向上和向前走 "测试的最小临床重要差异。在疼痛和功能恢复方面,结果显示差异无统计学意义。证据的确定性从中度到极低不等:结论:对于关节置换患者来说,通过远程康复进行治疗似乎能提供比在家治疗更好的运动表现水平。相反,目前还没有确凿证据表明远程康复与标准的面对面治疗具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation for Functional Recovery After Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy treatment provided remotely via the Internet in the postoperative treatment of orthopedic patients and compare it with standard physiotherapy (face-to-face treatment or home-based treatment) in terms of motor performance, pain symptoms, and functional recovery.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database; EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINHAL was conducted. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias (ROB) assessment using Cochrane ROB 2 tools, and summarize the results by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

Results: Eleven randomized controlled trial were selected. Pooled results showed improvement in motor performance in favor of the telerehabilitation group at 4-6 weeks (standardized mean difference -0.24, 95% confidence interval -0.45, -0.02, p = 0.03), and these differences were close to the minimum clinically important difference for Time Up and Go test. For pain and functional recovery, the results showed differences not statistically important. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.

Conclusion: For joint replacement patients, treatment conducted via telerehabilitation appears able to provide levels of motor performance better to that achieved through home-based treatment. In contrast, conclusive evidence that telerehabilitation is comparable to standard face-to-face treatment are not available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信