宽颈分叉动脉瘤的血管内治疗:线圈栓塞与辅助技术的最新趋势。

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI:10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0072
Shinya Haryu, Hiroyuki Sakata, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo
{"title":"宽颈分叉动脉瘤的血管内治疗:线圈栓塞与辅助技术的最新趋势。","authors":"Shinya Haryu, Hiroyuki Sakata, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo","doi":"10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are sometimes challenging to treat. During endovascular treatment, it is important to prevent coil deviation and preserve normal vessels. Adjunctive balloon- and stent-assisted techniques have been developed. A meta-analysis of endovascular treatments of WNBAs revealed that only 40% of patients had complete occlusion. Recently, novel devices have been developed to expand the range of treatment options. Flow-diverter stents and intra-aneurysmal flow disruption devices do not require coils; however, coil embolization remains the standard procedure used by many neurointerventionists. This review describes the recent trends in adjunctive techniques for supporting coil embolization for WNBAs. We referred to literature on balloon-assisted techniques, stent-assisted techniques, Y-stenting, PulseRider, Barrel stents, Comaneci temporary stents, pCONUS, and eCLIPs. These reports showed that adequate embolization rates were generally greater than 80%, and the complete occlusion rate was as high as 94.6%. All devices had a relatively high occlusion rate; however, it may be inaccurate to simply compare each device because of the heterogeneity of the studies. It is important to select the best treatment for each individual case by considering not only literature-based efficacy and safety but also patient background, aneurysm characteristics, and operator experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"18 3","pages":"75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysm: Recent Trends in Coil Embolization with Adjunctive Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Shinya Haryu, Hiroyuki Sakata, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are sometimes challenging to treat. During endovascular treatment, it is important to prevent coil deviation and preserve normal vessels. Adjunctive balloon- and stent-assisted techniques have been developed. A meta-analysis of endovascular treatments of WNBAs revealed that only 40% of patients had complete occlusion. Recently, novel devices have been developed to expand the range of treatment options. Flow-diverter stents and intra-aneurysmal flow disruption devices do not require coils; however, coil embolization remains the standard procedure used by many neurointerventionists. This review describes the recent trends in adjunctive techniques for supporting coil embolization for WNBAs. We referred to literature on balloon-assisted techniques, stent-assisted techniques, Y-stenting, PulseRider, Barrel stents, Comaneci temporary stents, pCONUS, and eCLIPs. These reports showed that adequate embolization rates were generally greater than 80%, and the complete occlusion rate was as high as 94.6%. All devices had a relatively high occlusion rate; however, it may be inaccurate to simply compare each device because of the heterogeneity of the studies. It is important to select the best treatment for each individual case by considering not only literature-based efficacy and safety but also patient background, aneurysm characteristics, and operator experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"75-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宽颈分叉动脉瘤(WNBAs)的治疗有时具有挑战性。在血管内治疗过程中,防止线圈偏离和保护正常血管非常重要。目前已开发出球囊和支架辅助技术。一项关于 WNBA 血管内治疗的荟萃分析显示,只有 40% 的患者能够完全闭塞。最近,新设备的开发扩大了治疗选择的范围。分流支架和动脉瘤内血流阻断装置不需要线圈,但线圈栓塞仍是许多神经介入医生使用的标准程序。本综述介绍了支持线圈栓塞治疗 WNBA 的辅助技术的最新趋势。我们参考了有关球囊辅助技术、支架辅助技术、Y 型支架、PulseRider、Barrel 支架、Comaneci 临时支架、pCONUS 和 eCLIPs 的文献。这些报告显示,充分栓塞率一般高于 80%,完全闭塞率高达 94.6%。所有设备的闭塞率都相对较高;但是,由于研究的异质性,简单地比较每种设备可能并不准确。为每个病例选择最佳治疗方法非常重要,不仅要考虑文献中的疗效和安全性,还要考虑患者背景、动脉瘤特征和操作者经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysm: Recent Trends in Coil Embolization with Adjunctive Technique.

Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are sometimes challenging to treat. During endovascular treatment, it is important to prevent coil deviation and preserve normal vessels. Adjunctive balloon- and stent-assisted techniques have been developed. A meta-analysis of endovascular treatments of WNBAs revealed that only 40% of patients had complete occlusion. Recently, novel devices have been developed to expand the range of treatment options. Flow-diverter stents and intra-aneurysmal flow disruption devices do not require coils; however, coil embolization remains the standard procedure used by many neurointerventionists. This review describes the recent trends in adjunctive techniques for supporting coil embolization for WNBAs. We referred to literature on balloon-assisted techniques, stent-assisted techniques, Y-stenting, PulseRider, Barrel stents, Comaneci temporary stents, pCONUS, and eCLIPs. These reports showed that adequate embolization rates were generally greater than 80%, and the complete occlusion rate was as high as 94.6%. All devices had a relatively high occlusion rate; however, it may be inaccurate to simply compare each device because of the heterogeneity of the studies. It is important to select the best treatment for each individual case by considering not only literature-based efficacy and safety but also patient background, aneurysm characteristics, and operator experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信