Jun Haruma, Kenji Sugiu, Yuki Ebisudani, Ryu Kimura, Hisanori Edaki, Yoko Yamaoka, Masato Kawakami, Yuta Soutome, Masafumi Hiramatsu
{"title":"后循环颅内动脉断裂的血管内治疗。","authors":"Jun Haruma, Kenji Sugiu, Yuki Ebisudani, Ryu Kimura, Hisanori Edaki, Yoko Yamaoka, Masato Kawakami, Yuta Soutome, Masafumi Hiramatsu","doi":"10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracranial artery dissections (IADs), although uncommon, are an important cause of cerebral infarction and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Some IADs can heal spontaneously after reconstitution of the vessel lumen with excellent prognosis. Meanwhile, others can progress to stroke that requires treatment. The incidence of IAD in the posterior circulation is higher than that in the anterior circulation. Anterior circulation dissections are more likely to develop into ischemia and posterior circulation lesions into hemorrhage. The mortality rate after IAD among patients with SAH is 19%-83%. Further, the mortality rate of IAD without SAH is 0%-3%. Patients with SAH commonly undergo surgery or receive neuroendovascular treatment (EVT) to prevent rebleeding. However, the treatment of IADs is empirical in the absence of data from randomized controlled trials. Recently, EVT has emerged and is considered for IADs because of its less invasiveness and perceived low rates of procedure-related morbidity with good efficacy. EVT strategies can be classified into deconstructive (involving sacrifice of the parent artery) and reconstructive (preserving blood flow via the parent vessel) techniques. In particular, the number of reports on reconstructive techniques is increasing. However, a reconstructive technique for ruptured IADs has not yet been established. This review aimed to provide an overview of IADs in the posterior circulation managed with EVT by performing a literature search.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"18 3","pages":"92-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Artery Dissections in Posterior Circulation.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Haruma, Kenji Sugiu, Yuki Ebisudani, Ryu Kimura, Hisanori Edaki, Yoko Yamaoka, Masato Kawakami, Yuta Soutome, Masafumi Hiramatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intracranial artery dissections (IADs), although uncommon, are an important cause of cerebral infarction and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Some IADs can heal spontaneously after reconstitution of the vessel lumen with excellent prognosis. Meanwhile, others can progress to stroke that requires treatment. The incidence of IAD in the posterior circulation is higher than that in the anterior circulation. Anterior circulation dissections are more likely to develop into ischemia and posterior circulation lesions into hemorrhage. The mortality rate after IAD among patients with SAH is 19%-83%. Further, the mortality rate of IAD without SAH is 0%-3%. Patients with SAH commonly undergo surgery or receive neuroendovascular treatment (EVT) to prevent rebleeding. However, the treatment of IADs is empirical in the absence of data from randomized controlled trials. Recently, EVT has emerged and is considered for IADs because of its less invasiveness and perceived low rates of procedure-related morbidity with good efficacy. EVT strategies can be classified into deconstructive (involving sacrifice of the parent artery) and reconstructive (preserving blood flow via the parent vessel) techniques. In particular, the number of reports on reconstructive techniques is increasing. However, a reconstructive technique for ruptured IADs has not yet been established. This review aimed to provide an overview of IADs in the posterior circulation managed with EVT by performing a literature search.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"92-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
颅内动脉断裂(IAD)虽然并不常见,但却是导致脑梗塞和蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的重要原因。有些 IAD 可在血管腔重建后自愈,预后良好。而另一些则可能发展为需要治疗的脑卒中。后循环 IAD 的发病率高于前循环。前循环断裂更容易发展为缺血,而后循环病变更容易发展为出血。SAH 患者 IAD 后的死亡率为 19%-83%。此外,无 SAH 的 IAD 死亡率为 0%-3%。SAH 患者通常会接受手术或神经内血管治疗(EVT)以防止再出血。然而,由于缺乏随机对照试验的数据,IAD 的治疗仍是经验性的。最近,EVT 出现并被考虑用于 IAD,因为它创伤小、手术相关发病率低且疗效好。EVT策略可分为解构(涉及牺牲母动脉)和重建(通过母血管保留血流)技术。特别是,关于重建技术的报告数量正在增加。然而,针对破裂 IAD 的重建技术尚未确立。本综述旨在通过文献检索,概述用 EVT 治疗后循环 IAD 的情况。
Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Artery Dissections in Posterior Circulation.
Intracranial artery dissections (IADs), although uncommon, are an important cause of cerebral infarction and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Some IADs can heal spontaneously after reconstitution of the vessel lumen with excellent prognosis. Meanwhile, others can progress to stroke that requires treatment. The incidence of IAD in the posterior circulation is higher than that in the anterior circulation. Anterior circulation dissections are more likely to develop into ischemia and posterior circulation lesions into hemorrhage. The mortality rate after IAD among patients with SAH is 19%-83%. Further, the mortality rate of IAD without SAH is 0%-3%. Patients with SAH commonly undergo surgery or receive neuroendovascular treatment (EVT) to prevent rebleeding. However, the treatment of IADs is empirical in the absence of data from randomized controlled trials. Recently, EVT has emerged and is considered for IADs because of its less invasiveness and perceived low rates of procedure-related morbidity with good efficacy. EVT strategies can be classified into deconstructive (involving sacrifice of the parent artery) and reconstructive (preserving blood flow via the parent vessel) techniques. In particular, the number of reports on reconstructive techniques is increasing. However, a reconstructive technique for ruptured IADs has not yet been established. This review aimed to provide an overview of IADs in the posterior circulation managed with EVT by performing a literature search.