Christina Bolte, Franziska Wefer, Sonja Stulgies, Jutta Tewesmeier, Sarah Lohmeier, Christopher Hachmeister, Simeon Günther, Jana Schumacher, Kawa Mohemed, Volker Rudolph, Lars Krüger
{"title":"[重症监护室复苏后谈话:跨专业生活--必备!]","authors":"Christina Bolte, Franziska Wefer, Sonja Stulgies, Jutta Tewesmeier, Sarah Lohmeier, Christopher Hachmeister, Simeon Günther, Jana Schumacher, Kawa Mohemed, Volker Rudolph, Lars Krüger","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of medical care, healthcare professionals are confronted with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which can have long-term effects on the participants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a protocol-supported post-resuscitation talk for practice in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Within the evidence-based nursing working group, university-qualified nurses performed a systematic literature search in CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane, London, England), LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany), and PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) as well as using the snowball principle. Based on the results, the post-resuscitation talk and a debriefing protocol were developed and consented in a multiprofessional team. Additionally, a questionnaire to analyze the current situation (t<sub>0</sub>) and evaluate the implementation (t<sub>1</sub>) was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the post-resuscitation talk was conducted from August 2021. The t<sub>0</sub> survey took place from June to July 2021 and for t<sub>1</sub> from February to March 2022. In t<sub>0</sub>, fewer interprofessional reflections were carried out after resuscitations in the category always or frequently (17.5%, n = 7) than in t<sub>1</sub> (50.0%, n = 13). The rate of initiated improvement interventions was increased (t<sub>0</sub>: 24.3%, n = 9 vs. t<sub>1</sub>: 59.1%, n = 13). The results show promotion of multiprofessional collaboration in t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>, and potential for optimization in the debriefing protocol in t<sub>1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a post-resuscitation talk in hospitals is a useful tool for the structured interprofessional follow-up of resuscitation events. The results demonstrated initial positive effects and potential for optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Post-resuscitation talk in the intensive care unit : Living interprofessionalism-a must have!]\",\"authors\":\"Christina Bolte, Franziska Wefer, Sonja Stulgies, Jutta Tewesmeier, Sarah Lohmeier, Christopher Hachmeister, Simeon Günther, Jana Schumacher, Kawa Mohemed, Volker Rudolph, Lars Krüger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of medical care, healthcare professionals are confronted with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which can have long-term effects on the participants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a protocol-supported post-resuscitation talk for practice in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Within the evidence-based nursing working group, university-qualified nurses performed a systematic literature search in CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane, London, England), LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany), and PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) as well as using the snowball principle. Based on the results, the post-resuscitation talk and a debriefing protocol were developed and consented in a multiprofessional team. Additionally, a questionnaire to analyze the current situation (t<sub>0</sub>) and evaluate the implementation (t<sub>1</sub>) was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the post-resuscitation talk was conducted from August 2021. The t<sub>0</sub> survey took place from June to July 2021 and for t<sub>1</sub> from February to March 2022. In t<sub>0</sub>, fewer interprofessional reflections were carried out after resuscitations in the category always or frequently (17.5%, n = 7) than in t<sub>1</sub> (50.0%, n = 13). The rate of initiated improvement interventions was increased (t<sub>0</sub>: 24.3%, n = 9 vs. t<sub>1</sub>: 59.1%, n = 13). The results show promotion of multiprofessional collaboration in t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>, and potential for optimization in the debriefing protocol in t<sub>1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a post-resuscitation talk in hospitals is a useful tool for the structured interprofessional follow-up of resuscitation events. The results demonstrated initial positive effects and potential for optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Post-resuscitation talk in the intensive care unit : Living interprofessionalism-a must have!]
Background: In the context of medical care, healthcare professionals are confronted with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which can have long-term effects on the participants.
Objective: The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a protocol-supported post-resuscitation talk for practice in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Materials and methods: Within the evidence-based nursing working group, university-qualified nurses performed a systematic literature search in CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane, London, England), LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany), and PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) as well as using the snowball principle. Based on the results, the post-resuscitation talk and a debriefing protocol were developed and consented in a multiprofessional team. Additionally, a questionnaire to analyze the current situation (t0) and evaluate the implementation (t1) was developed.
Results: Implementation of the post-resuscitation talk was conducted from August 2021. The t0 survey took place from June to July 2021 and for t1 from February to March 2022. In t0, fewer interprofessional reflections were carried out after resuscitations in the category always or frequently (17.5%, n = 7) than in t1 (50.0%, n = 13). The rate of initiated improvement interventions was increased (t0: 24.3%, n = 9 vs. t1: 59.1%, n = 13). The results show promotion of multiprofessional collaboration in t0 and t1, and potential for optimization in the debriefing protocol in t1.
Conclusion: Implementation of a post-resuscitation talk in hospitals is a useful tool for the structured interprofessional follow-up of resuscitation events. The results demonstrated initial positive effects and potential for optimization.
期刊介绍:
Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine.
Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.