[重症监护室复苏后谈话:跨专业生活--必备!]

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christina Bolte, Franziska Wefer, Sonja Stulgies, Jutta Tewesmeier, Sarah Lohmeier, Christopher Hachmeister, Simeon Günther, Jana Schumacher, Kawa Mohemed, Volker Rudolph, Lars Krüger
{"title":"[重症监护室复苏后谈话:跨专业生活--必备!]","authors":"Christina Bolte, Franziska Wefer, Sonja Stulgies, Jutta Tewesmeier, Sarah Lohmeier, Christopher Hachmeister, Simeon Günther, Jana Schumacher, Kawa Mohemed, Volker Rudolph, Lars Krüger","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of medical care, healthcare professionals are confronted with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which can have long-term effects on the participants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a protocol-supported post-resuscitation talk for practice in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Within the evidence-based nursing working group, university-qualified nurses performed a systematic literature search in CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane, London, England), LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany), and PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) as well as using the snowball principle. Based on the results, the post-resuscitation talk and a debriefing protocol were developed and consented in a multiprofessional team. Additionally, a questionnaire to analyze the current situation (t<sub>0</sub>) and evaluate the implementation (t<sub>1</sub>) was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the post-resuscitation talk was conducted from August 2021. The t<sub>0</sub> survey took place from June to July 2021 and for t<sub>1</sub> from February to March 2022. In t<sub>0</sub>, fewer interprofessional reflections were carried out after resuscitations in the category always or frequently (17.5%, n = 7) than in t<sub>1</sub> (50.0%, n = 13). The rate of initiated improvement interventions was increased (t<sub>0</sub>: 24.3%, n = 9 vs. t<sub>1</sub>: 59.1%, n = 13). The results show promotion of multiprofessional collaboration in t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>, and potential for optimization in the debriefing protocol in t<sub>1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a post-resuscitation talk in hospitals is a useful tool for the structured interprofessional follow-up of resuscitation events. The results demonstrated initial positive effects and potential for optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Post-resuscitation talk in the intensive care unit : Living interprofessionalism-a must have!]\",\"authors\":\"Christina Bolte, Franziska Wefer, Sonja Stulgies, Jutta Tewesmeier, Sarah Lohmeier, Christopher Hachmeister, Simeon Günther, Jana Schumacher, Kawa Mohemed, Volker Rudolph, Lars Krüger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of medical care, healthcare professionals are confronted with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which can have long-term effects on the participants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a protocol-supported post-resuscitation talk for practice in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Within the evidence-based nursing working group, university-qualified nurses performed a systematic literature search in CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane, London, England), LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany), and PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) as well as using the snowball principle. Based on the results, the post-resuscitation talk and a debriefing protocol were developed and consented in a multiprofessional team. Additionally, a questionnaire to analyze the current situation (t<sub>0</sub>) and evaluate the implementation (t<sub>1</sub>) was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the post-resuscitation talk was conducted from August 2021. The t<sub>0</sub> survey took place from June to July 2021 and for t<sub>1</sub> from February to March 2022. In t<sub>0</sub>, fewer interprofessional reflections were carried out after resuscitations in the category always or frequently (17.5%, n = 7) than in t<sub>1</sub> (50.0%, n = 13). The rate of initiated improvement interventions was increased (t<sub>0</sub>: 24.3%, n = 9 vs. t<sub>1</sub>: 59.1%, n = 13). The results show promotion of multiprofessional collaboration in t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>, and potential for optimization in the debriefing protocol in t<sub>1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a post-resuscitation talk in hospitals is a useful tool for the structured interprofessional follow-up of resuscitation events. The results demonstrated initial positive effects and potential for optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01129-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在医疗护理中,医护人员会面临心肺复苏,这可能会对参与者产生长期影响:材料与方法:在循证护理工作小组内,由具有大学资格的人员对心肺复苏术的相关知识进行了检索:在循证护理工作组内,大学合格护士在 CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany)、Cochrane 图书馆 (Cochrane, London, England)、LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany)、PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA)进行了系统的文献检索,并采用了滚雪球原则。根据研究结果,制定了复苏后谈话和汇报协议,并得到了多专业团队的同意。此外,还编制了一份调查问卷,用于分析现状(t0)和评估实施情况(t1):结果:复苏后谈话从 2021 年 8 月开始实施。t0 调查于 2021 年 6 月至 7 月进行,t1 调查于 2022 年 2 月至 3 月进行。与 t1(50.0%,n = 13)相比,在 t0 中,复苏后总是或经常进行专业间反思的人数较少(17.5%,n = 7)。开始改进干预的比例有所提高(t0:24.3%,n = 9 vs. t1:59.1%,n = 13)。结果表明,在 t0 和 t1 阶段,多专业合作得到了促进,而在 t1 阶段,汇报协议还有优化的潜力:在医院实施复苏后谈话是对复苏事件进行结构化跨专业跟踪的有用工具。结果显示了初步的积极效果和优化潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Post-resuscitation talk in the intensive care unit : Living interprofessionalism-a must have!]

Background: In the context of medical care, healthcare professionals are confronted with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which can have long-term effects on the participants.

Objective: The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a protocol-supported post-resuscitation talk for practice in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Materials and methods: Within the evidence-based nursing working group, university-qualified nurses performed a systematic literature search in CareLit (hpsmedia, Hungen, Germany), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane, London, England), LIVIVO (Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin, Cologne, Germany), and PubMed/MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) as well as using the snowball principle. Based on the results, the post-resuscitation talk and a debriefing protocol were developed and consented in a multiprofessional team. Additionally, a questionnaire to analyze the current situation (t0) and evaluate the implementation (t1) was developed.

Results: Implementation of the post-resuscitation talk was conducted from August 2021. The t0 survey took place from June to July 2021 and for t1 from February to March 2022. In t0, fewer interprofessional reflections were carried out after resuscitations in the category always or frequently (17.5%, n = 7) than in t1 (50.0%, n = 13). The rate of initiated improvement interventions was increased (t0: 24.3%, n = 9 vs. t1: 59.1%, n = 13). The results show promotion of multiprofessional collaboration in t0 and t1, and potential for optimization in the debriefing protocol in t1.

Conclusion: Implementation of a post-resuscitation talk in hospitals is a useful tool for the structured interprofessional follow-up of resuscitation events. The results demonstrated initial positive effects and potential for optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信