伦理诚信的官僚化：研究伦理委员会与风险想象

IF 1.5 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY

Anthropology Today Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1111/1467-8322.12872

Cris Shore

{"title":"伦理诚信的官僚化：研究伦理委员会与风险想象","authors":"Cris Shore","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This article critiques the expanding influence of research ethics committees (RECs) on social research, emphasizing their adverse effects on ethnographic methodologies. It argues that the bureaucratization of ethics, emphasizing compliance over contextual understanding, fundamentally misunderstands and impedes the nuanced nature of ethnographic work. Drawing on personal experiences and broader critiques, the article proposes the need for an alternative system that better accommodates the ethical complexities of social research, advocating for a more tailored approach that respects disciplinary methodologies and fosters genuine ethical engagement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46293,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8322.12872","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bureaucratization of ethical integrity: Research ethics committees and imaginaries of risk\",\"authors\":\"Cris Shore\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8322.12872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>This article critiques the expanding influence of research ethics committees (RECs) on social research, emphasizing their adverse effects on ethnographic methodologies. It argues that the bureaucratization of ethics, emphasizing compliance over contextual understanding, fundamentally misunderstands and impedes the nuanced nature of ethnographic work. Drawing on personal experiences and broader critiques, the article proposes the need for an alternative system that better accommodates the ethical complexities of social research, advocating for a more tailored approach that respects disciplinary methodologies and fosters genuine ethical engagement.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8322.12872\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8322.12872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8322.12872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文批评了研究伦理委员会（RECs）对社会研究不断扩大的影响，强调了其对人种学方法论的不利影响。文章认为，伦理的官僚化强调遵从而非背景理解，从根本上误解并阻碍了人种学工作的细微差别。文章以个人经历和更广泛的批评为基础，提出有必要建立一个能更好地适应社会研究伦理复杂性的替代体系，倡导一种更有针对性的方法，既尊重学科方法，又促进真正的伦理参与。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The bureaucratization of ethical integrity: Research ethics committees and imaginaries of risk

This article critiques the expanding influence of research ethics committees (RECs) on social research, emphasizing their adverse effects on ethnographic methodologies. It argues that the bureaucratization of ethics, emphasizing compliance over contextual understanding, fundamentally misunderstands and impedes the nuanced nature of ethnographic work. Drawing on personal experiences and broader critiques, the article proposes the need for an alternative system that better accommodates the ethical complexities of social research, advocating for a more tailored approach that respects disciplinary methodologies and fosters genuine ethical engagement.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Anthropology Today ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anthropology Today is a bimonthly publication which aims to provide a forum for the application of anthropological analysis to public and topical issues, while reflecting the breadth of interests within the discipline of anthropology. It is also committed to promoting debate at the interface between anthropology and areas of applied knowledge such as education, medicine, development etc. as well as that between anthropology and other academic disciplines. Anthropology Today encourages submissions on a wide range of topics, consistent with these aims. Anthropology Today is an international journal both in the scope of issues it covers and in the sources it draws from.