简要报告:无症状奥西美替尼诱发间质性肺病后,奥西美替尼与厄洛替尼再挑战导致间质性肺病复发的风险

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Molly S.C. Li M.B.B.S. , Kirsty W.C. Lee MBChB , Kevin K.S. Mok MBChB , Herbert H.F. Loong M.B.B.S. , K.C. Lam MBChB , Florence S.T. Mok M.B.B.S. , Landon L. Chan MBChB , Y.M. Lau M.B.B.S. , K.P. Chan MBChB , Joyce T.Y. Ng MBChB , Wesley K.Y. Wong M.B.B.S. , Benjamin H.W. Lam M.B.B.S. , Allen C.C. Chen BM , Matthew M.P. Lee MBChB , Olivia H. Chen MD, PhD , Tony S.K. Mok MD
{"title":"简要报告:无症状奥西美替尼诱发间质性肺病后,奥西美替尼与厄洛替尼再挑战导致间质性肺病复发的风险","authors":"Molly S.C. Li M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Kirsty W.C. Lee MBChB ,&nbsp;Kevin K.S. Mok MBChB ,&nbsp;Herbert H.F. Loong M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;K.C. Lam MBChB ,&nbsp;Florence S.T. Mok M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Landon L. Chan MBChB ,&nbsp;Y.M. Lau M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;K.P. Chan MBChB ,&nbsp;Joyce T.Y. Ng MBChB ,&nbsp;Wesley K.Y. Wong M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Benjamin H.W. Lam M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Allen C.C. Chen BM ,&nbsp;Matthew M.P. Lee MBChB ,&nbsp;Olivia H. Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tony S.K. Mok MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most frequent cause of drug-related mortality from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Yet, for patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, the risk of recurrent ILD associated with EGFR TKI rechallenge, either with osimertinib or another TKI, such as erlotinib, is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective study of 913 patients who received osimertinib treatment for <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive NSCLC. Clinical characteristics, ILD treatment history, and subsequent anticancer therapy of patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD were collated. The primary end point was to compare the incidence of recurrent ILD with osimertinib versus erlotinib rechallenge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 913 patients, 35 (3.8%) had symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, of which 12 (34%), 15 (43%), and eight (23%) had grade 2, 3 to 4, and 5 ILD, respectively. On ILD recovery, 17 patients had EGFR TKI rechallenge with eight received osimertinib and nine received erlotinib. The risk of recurrent ILD was higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib (<em>p</em> = 0.0498). Of eight, five (63%) developed recurrent ILD on osimertinib rechallenge, including three patients with fatal outcomes. In contrast, only one of nine patients (11%) treated with erlotinib had recurrent ILD. Median time to second ILD occurrence was 4.7 (range 0.7–12) weeks. Median time-to-treatment failure of patients with erlotinib rechallenge was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval: 8.6–15.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The risk of recurrent ILD was considerably higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib. Osimertinib rechallenge should be avoided, whereas erlotinib may be considered in patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000183/pdfft?md5=a61f22993f5c7bf6be994155930c4030&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000183-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Report: Risk of Recurrent Interstitial Lung Disease From Osimertinib Versus Erlotinib Rechallenge After Symptomatic Osimertinib-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease\",\"authors\":\"Molly S.C. Li M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Kirsty W.C. Lee MBChB ,&nbsp;Kevin K.S. Mok MBChB ,&nbsp;Herbert H.F. Loong M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;K.C. Lam MBChB ,&nbsp;Florence S.T. Mok M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Landon L. Chan MBChB ,&nbsp;Y.M. Lau M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;K.P. Chan MBChB ,&nbsp;Joyce T.Y. Ng MBChB ,&nbsp;Wesley K.Y. Wong M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Benjamin H.W. Lam M.B.B.S. ,&nbsp;Allen C.C. Chen BM ,&nbsp;Matthew M.P. Lee MBChB ,&nbsp;Olivia H. Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tony S.K. Mok MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most frequent cause of drug-related mortality from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Yet, for patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, the risk of recurrent ILD associated with EGFR TKI rechallenge, either with osimertinib or another TKI, such as erlotinib, is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective study of 913 patients who received osimertinib treatment for <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive NSCLC. Clinical characteristics, ILD treatment history, and subsequent anticancer therapy of patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD were collated. The primary end point was to compare the incidence of recurrent ILD with osimertinib versus erlotinib rechallenge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 913 patients, 35 (3.8%) had symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, of which 12 (34%), 15 (43%), and eight (23%) had grade 2, 3 to 4, and 5 ILD, respectively. On ILD recovery, 17 patients had EGFR TKI rechallenge with eight received osimertinib and nine received erlotinib. The risk of recurrent ILD was higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib (<em>p</em> = 0.0498). Of eight, five (63%) developed recurrent ILD on osimertinib rechallenge, including three patients with fatal outcomes. In contrast, only one of nine patients (11%) treated with erlotinib had recurrent ILD. Median time to second ILD occurrence was 4.7 (range 0.7–12) weeks. Median time-to-treatment failure of patients with erlotinib rechallenge was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval: 8.6–15.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The risk of recurrent ILD was considerably higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib. Osimertinib rechallenge should be avoided, whereas erlotinib may be considered in patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000183/pdfft?md5=a61f22993f5c7bf6be994155930c4030&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000183-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言间质性肺病(ILD)是表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)导致药物相关死亡的最常见原因。然而,对于有症状的奥希替尼诱发的ILD患者来说,与EGFR TKI再挑战相关的ILD复发风险尚不清楚,无论是奥希替尼还是另一种TKI,如厄洛替尼。方法对913例接受奥希替尼治疗的EGFR突变阳性NSCLC患者进行了回顾性研究。整理了有症状的奥希替尼诱发 ILD 患者的临床特征、ILD 治疗史和后续抗癌治疗。结果 在913例患者中,35例(3.8%)有症状性奥司替尼诱导的ILD,其中分别有12例(34%)、15例(43%)和8例(23%)为2级、3至4级和5级ILD。在ILD康复后,17名患者进行了EGFR TKI再挑战,其中8人接受了奥希替尼治疗,9人接受了厄洛替尼治疗。与厄洛替尼相比,奥希替尼再挑战ILD的复发风险更高(p = 0.0498)。8名患者中,有5名(63%)在接受奥希替尼再挑战后出现了复发性ILD,其中3名患者出现了致命后果。相比之下,接受厄洛替尼治疗的9名患者中仅有1名(11%)复发了ILD。第二次ILD发生的中位时间为4.7周(0.7-12周)。厄洛替尼再治疗患者治疗失败的中位时间为13.2个月(95%置信区间:8.6-15.0)。应避免奥希替尼再治疗,而对于有症状的奥希替尼诱发的ILD患者,可以考虑使用厄洛替尼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief Report: Risk of Recurrent Interstitial Lung Disease From Osimertinib Versus Erlotinib Rechallenge After Symptomatic Osimertinib-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease

Introduction

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most frequent cause of drug-related mortality from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Yet, for patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, the risk of recurrent ILD associated with EGFR TKI rechallenge, either with osimertinib or another TKI, such as erlotinib, is unclear.

Methods

Retrospective study of 913 patients who received osimertinib treatment for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Clinical characteristics, ILD treatment history, and subsequent anticancer therapy of patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD were collated. The primary end point was to compare the incidence of recurrent ILD with osimertinib versus erlotinib rechallenge.

Results

Of 913 patients, 35 (3.8%) had symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, of which 12 (34%), 15 (43%), and eight (23%) had grade 2, 3 to 4, and 5 ILD, respectively. On ILD recovery, 17 patients had EGFR TKI rechallenge with eight received osimertinib and nine received erlotinib. The risk of recurrent ILD was higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib (p = 0.0498). Of eight, five (63%) developed recurrent ILD on osimertinib rechallenge, including three patients with fatal outcomes. In contrast, only one of nine patients (11%) treated with erlotinib had recurrent ILD. Median time to second ILD occurrence was 4.7 (range 0.7–12) weeks. Median time-to-treatment failure of patients with erlotinib rechallenge was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval: 8.6–15.0).

Conclusions

The risk of recurrent ILD was considerably higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib. Osimertinib rechallenge should be avoided, whereas erlotinib may be considered in patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信