Valentin Kasburg, Jozef Müller, Tom Eulenfeld, Alexander Breuer, Nina Kukowski
{"title":"通过卷积神经网络进行跨区域地震事件判别:探索微调与集合平均","authors":"Valentin Kasburg, Jozef Müller, Tom Eulenfeld, Alexander Breuer, Nina Kukowski","doi":"10.1785/0120230198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gradual densification of seismic networks has facilitated the acquisition of large amounts of data. However, alongside natural tectonic earthquakes, seismic networks also record anthropogenic events such as quarry blasts or other induced events. Identifying and distinguishing these events from natural earthquakes requires experienced interpreters to ensure that seismological studies of natural phenomena are not compromised by anthropogenic events. Advanced artificial intelligence methods have already been deployed to tackle this problem. One of the applications includes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to discriminate different kinds of events, such as natural earthquakes and quarry blasts. In this study, we investigate the effects of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning on seismic event discrimination accuracy to estimate the potential of these methods. We compare discrimination accuracy of two different CNN model architectures across three datasets. This was done with the best models from an ensemble of each model architecture, as well as with ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning methods. Soft voting was used for the CNN ensemble predictions. For the transfer learning approach, the models were pretrained with data from two of the datasets (nontarget regions) and fine‐tuned with data from the third one (target region). The results show that ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning of CNN models leads to better generalization of the model predictions. For the region with the lowest numbers of one event type, the combination of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning led to an increase in discrimination accuracy of up to 4% at station level and up to 10% at event level. We also tested the impact of the amount of training data on the fine‐tuning method, showing, that to create a global model, the selection of comprehensive training data is needed.","PeriodicalId":9444,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross‐Regional Seismic Event Discrimination via Convolutional Neural Networks: Exploring Fine‐Tuning and Ensemble Averaging\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Kasburg, Jozef Müller, Tom Eulenfeld, Alexander Breuer, Nina Kukowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0120230198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The gradual densification of seismic networks has facilitated the acquisition of large amounts of data. However, alongside natural tectonic earthquakes, seismic networks also record anthropogenic events such as quarry blasts or other induced events. Identifying and distinguishing these events from natural earthquakes requires experienced interpreters to ensure that seismological studies of natural phenomena are not compromised by anthropogenic events. Advanced artificial intelligence methods have already been deployed to tackle this problem. One of the applications includes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to discriminate different kinds of events, such as natural earthquakes and quarry blasts. In this study, we investigate the effects of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning on seismic event discrimination accuracy to estimate the potential of these methods. We compare discrimination accuracy of two different CNN model architectures across three datasets. This was done with the best models from an ensemble of each model architecture, as well as with ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning methods. Soft voting was used for the CNN ensemble predictions. For the transfer learning approach, the models were pretrained with data from two of the datasets (nontarget regions) and fine‐tuned with data from the third one (target region). The results show that ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning of CNN models leads to better generalization of the model predictions. For the region with the lowest numbers of one event type, the combination of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning led to an increase in discrimination accuracy of up to 4% at station level and up to 10% at event level. We also tested the impact of the amount of training data on the fine‐tuning method, showing, that to create a global model, the selection of comprehensive training data is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross‐Regional Seismic Event Discrimination via Convolutional Neural Networks: Exploring Fine‐Tuning and Ensemble Averaging
The gradual densification of seismic networks has facilitated the acquisition of large amounts of data. However, alongside natural tectonic earthquakes, seismic networks also record anthropogenic events such as quarry blasts or other induced events. Identifying and distinguishing these events from natural earthquakes requires experienced interpreters to ensure that seismological studies of natural phenomena are not compromised by anthropogenic events. Advanced artificial intelligence methods have already been deployed to tackle this problem. One of the applications includes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to discriminate different kinds of events, such as natural earthquakes and quarry blasts. In this study, we investigate the effects of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning on seismic event discrimination accuracy to estimate the potential of these methods. We compare discrimination accuracy of two different CNN model architectures across three datasets. This was done with the best models from an ensemble of each model architecture, as well as with ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning methods. Soft voting was used for the CNN ensemble predictions. For the transfer learning approach, the models were pretrained with data from two of the datasets (nontarget regions) and fine‐tuned with data from the third one (target region). The results show that ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning of CNN models leads to better generalization of the model predictions. For the region with the lowest numbers of one event type, the combination of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning led to an increase in discrimination accuracy of up to 4% at station level and up to 10% at event level. We also tested the impact of the amount of training data on the fine‐tuning method, showing, that to create a global model, the selection of comprehensive training data is needed.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, commonly referred to as BSSA, (ISSN 0037-1106) is the premier journal of advanced research in earthquake seismology and related disciplines. It first appeared in 1911 and became a bimonthly in 1963. Each issue is composed of scientific papers on the various aspects of seismology, including investigation of specific earthquakes, theoretical and observational studies of seismic waves, inverse methods for determining the structure of the Earth or the dynamics of the earthquake source, seismometry, earthquake hazard and risk estimation, seismotectonics, and earthquake engineering. Special issues focus on important earthquakes or rapidly changing topics in seismology. BSSA is published by the Seismological Society of America.