亡灵生态学:乔治-桑德斯的《中阴林肯》与生态哥特的局限性

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Eric Gary Anderson
{"title":"亡灵生态学:乔治-桑德斯的《中阴林肯》与生态哥特的局限性","authors":"Eric Gary Anderson","doi":"10.1353/saf.2023.a923099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Ecologies of the Undead: <span>George Saunders’s <em>Lincoln in the Bardo</em> and the Limits of the Ecogothic</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Eric Gary Anderson (bio) </li> </ul> <h2>Introduction: The Outer Limits</h2> <p><strong>“E</strong>coGothic” is, as Elizabeth Parker has written, a “fledgling term.”<sup>1</sup> Young as it is, it has already proven remarkably fruitful, in large part because it merges the open-endedness of ecocriticism with the ambiguities baked into gothic to describe an unsettling, elusive “ecocentric ambience” that has a long literary and cultural reach.<sup>2</sup> The ecogothic thus extends an American (and, as Parker argues, transnational) gothic that is itself capacious, “less a genre than a fluid, ubiquitous literary mode.”<sup>3</sup> Ecogothic studies is off to a quick start, with a dedicated scholarly journal, <em>Gothic Nature</em>; a monograph by the journal’s co-founder and co-editor, Parker; a collection of critical essays edited by Dawn Keetley and Matthew Wynn Sivils; and numerous journal articles and academic conferences. As Parker and co-editor Michelle Poland announce in the introduction to the second issue of <em>Gothic Nature</em>, published in 2021, “We live in ecoGothic times.”<sup>4</sup></p> <p>With this statement, Parker and Poland productively complicate the already formidable challenge of defining ecogothic by proposing that it encompasses not only grounded spatial locations—an old house in a dark forest, say—but also more abstract and more wide-ranging temporal coordinates. But what are “ecoGothic times?” What does it mean to view both space and time as both ecological and gothic? In his recent study of Anthropocene poetics, David Farrier points out that the Anthropocene by definition denotes human influence on physical environments and further posits that its “temporality . . . is <strong>[End Page 165]</strong> deeply menacing. Its breadth is bewildering.”<sup>5</sup> Farrier goes on to suggest that a vocabulary of ghosts and hauntings can help us wrap our minds around the vastness of the problem, the “unsettling” ways in which “our present is in fact accompanied by deep pasts and deep futures.”<sup>6</sup> Such arguments, with their attention to “the reciprocal relationship between life and nonlife,”<sup>7</sup> also drive the edited collection <em>Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet</em>, which is organized into sections on “Ghosts of the Anthropocene” and “Monsters of the Anthropocene.” The editors of this volume ask: “How can we get back to the pasts we need to see the present more clearly? We call this return to multiple pasts, human and not human, ‘ghosts.’ Every landscape is haunted by past ways of life” and, as if that is not enough eco-cultural spectrality, “anthropogenic landscapes are also haunted by imagined futures.”<sup>8</sup></p> <p>Such approaches resonate not only with current ecogothic thinking but also with George Saunders’s 2017 novel <em>Lincoln in the Bardo</em>, which is ghost-saturated and anchored to a very specific landscape as well as to a very specific historical moment, yet also temporally fluid and generous in imagining possible futures that ultimately break free of the bounded, ripely ecogothic space where much of the book’s action takes place, Oak Hill Cemetery in Washington, DC.<sup>9</sup> <em>Bardo</em> speaks to numerous concerns relevant to ecogothic studies: ecophobic entanglements; racial hauntings; queer undeadness; transcorporeality; questions of human and environmental agency; body horror; plant horror (especially demonic tendrils); and, ultimately, the positing of an uncanny nation that, if it were to come into being, would incorporate both whites and Blacks, both the socially privileged and underclasses, but also both the living and the undead and both the past and the future as bookends for a war-torn 1862 narrative present.<sup>10</sup> <em>Lincoln in the Bardo</em> thus reads its ghosts as both past and future citizens. Put another way, the ghosts in this novel are anchored to their memories of having been fully alive and are also making their way toward new ideas of undead agency that enable them to redefine themselves posthumously as Americans. Relatedly, I argue, the ecogothic manifests in occasional, flickering ways in this novel, as one among many genres and modes, rather than as a dominant mode. Like the undead characters in the book, the ecogothic itself transforms; <em>Bardo</em> illuminates unmistakably ecogothic moments but more frequently offers hinges between the ecogothic and a wide variety of other modes, many of them not...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42494,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecologies of the Undead: George Saunders's Lincoln in the Bardo and the Limits of the Ecogothic\",\"authors\":\"Eric Gary Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/saf.2023.a923099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Ecologies of the Undead: <span>George Saunders’s <em>Lincoln in the Bardo</em> and the Limits of the Ecogothic</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Eric Gary Anderson (bio) </li> </ul> <h2>Introduction: The Outer Limits</h2> <p><strong>“E</strong>coGothic” is, as Elizabeth Parker has written, a “fledgling term.”<sup>1</sup> Young as it is, it has already proven remarkably fruitful, in large part because it merges the open-endedness of ecocriticism with the ambiguities baked into gothic to describe an unsettling, elusive “ecocentric ambience” that has a long literary and cultural reach.<sup>2</sup> The ecogothic thus extends an American (and, as Parker argues, transnational) gothic that is itself capacious, “less a genre than a fluid, ubiquitous literary mode.”<sup>3</sup> Ecogothic studies is off to a quick start, with a dedicated scholarly journal, <em>Gothic Nature</em>; a monograph by the journal’s co-founder and co-editor, Parker; a collection of critical essays edited by Dawn Keetley and Matthew Wynn Sivils; and numerous journal articles and academic conferences. As Parker and co-editor Michelle Poland announce in the introduction to the second issue of <em>Gothic Nature</em>, published in 2021, “We live in ecoGothic times.”<sup>4</sup></p> <p>With this statement, Parker and Poland productively complicate the already formidable challenge of defining ecogothic by proposing that it encompasses not only grounded spatial locations—an old house in a dark forest, say—but also more abstract and more wide-ranging temporal coordinates. But what are “ecoGothic times?” What does it mean to view both space and time as both ecological and gothic? In his recent study of Anthropocene poetics, David Farrier points out that the Anthropocene by definition denotes human influence on physical environments and further posits that its “temporality . . . is <strong>[End Page 165]</strong> deeply menacing. Its breadth is bewildering.”<sup>5</sup> Farrier goes on to suggest that a vocabulary of ghosts and hauntings can help us wrap our minds around the vastness of the problem, the “unsettling” ways in which “our present is in fact accompanied by deep pasts and deep futures.”<sup>6</sup> Such arguments, with their attention to “the reciprocal relationship between life and nonlife,”<sup>7</sup> also drive the edited collection <em>Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet</em>, which is organized into sections on “Ghosts of the Anthropocene” and “Monsters of the Anthropocene.” The editors of this volume ask: “How can we get back to the pasts we need to see the present more clearly? We call this return to multiple pasts, human and not human, ‘ghosts.’ Every landscape is haunted by past ways of life” and, as if that is not enough eco-cultural spectrality, “anthropogenic landscapes are also haunted by imagined futures.”<sup>8</sup></p> <p>Such approaches resonate not only with current ecogothic thinking but also with George Saunders’s 2017 novel <em>Lincoln in the Bardo</em>, which is ghost-saturated and anchored to a very specific landscape as well as to a very specific historical moment, yet also temporally fluid and generous in imagining possible futures that ultimately break free of the bounded, ripely ecogothic space where much of the book’s action takes place, Oak Hill Cemetery in Washington, DC.<sup>9</sup> <em>Bardo</em> speaks to numerous concerns relevant to ecogothic studies: ecophobic entanglements; racial hauntings; queer undeadness; transcorporeality; questions of human and environmental agency; body horror; plant horror (especially demonic tendrils); and, ultimately, the positing of an uncanny nation that, if it were to come into being, would incorporate both whites and Blacks, both the socially privileged and underclasses, but also both the living and the undead and both the past and the future as bookends for a war-torn 1862 narrative present.<sup>10</sup> <em>Lincoln in the Bardo</em> thus reads its ghosts as both past and future citizens. Put another way, the ghosts in this novel are anchored to their memories of having been fully alive and are also making their way toward new ideas of undead agency that enable them to redefine themselves posthumously as Americans. Relatedly, I argue, the ecogothic manifests in occasional, flickering ways in this novel, as one among many genres and modes, rather than as a dominant mode. Like the undead characters in the book, the ecogothic itself transforms; <em>Bardo</em> illuminates unmistakably ecogothic moments but more frequently offers hinges between the ecogothic and a wide variety of other modes, many of them not...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.2023.a923099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.2023.a923099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 亡灵生态学:乔治-桑德斯的《中阴林肯》与生态哥特式的局限 埃里克-加里-安德森(简历) 引言:正如伊丽莎白-帕克(Elizabeth Parker)所写的那样,"生态哥特 "是一个 "刚刚起步的术语"。1 尽管它还很年轻,但已被证明硕果累累,这在很大程度上是因为它融合了生态批评的开放性和哥特小说的模糊性,以描述一种令人不安、难以捉摸的 "生态中心氛围",这种氛围在文学和文化领域影响深远2。因此,生态哥特式延伸了美国(正如帕克所言,也是跨国的)哥特式,它本身就很宽广,"与其说是一种流派,不如说是一种流动的、无处不在的文学模式 "3 。生态哥特式研究起步很快,有专门的学术期刊《哥特式自然》;该期刊的共同创办人和联合编辑帕克出版了一本专著;道恩-基特利和马修-怀恩-西维尔斯编辑了一本评论论文集;还有许多期刊论文和学术会议。正如帕克和联合主编米歇尔-波兰(Michelle Poland)在 2021 年出版的《哥特式自然》第二期导言中所说,"我们生活在生态哥特式时代 "4 。帕克和波兰提出,生态哥特式不仅包括接地气的空间位置--比如说黑暗森林中的一栋老房子,还包括更抽象、范围更广的时间坐标,从而使本已艰巨的生态哥特式定义挑战变得更加复杂。但什么是 "生态哥特时代"?将空间和时间同时视为生态和哥特式意味着什么?戴维-法里尔(David Farrier)在其最近关于 "人类世 "诗学的研究中指出,"人类世 "顾名思义是指人类对自然环境的影响,并进一步假定其 "时间性......是[第165页完]极具威胁性的。它的广度令人困惑。"5 Farrier 继续建议,幽灵和鬼魂的词汇可以帮助我们理解问题的广度,理解 "我们的现在实际上伴随着深刻的过去和深刻的未来 "6 的 "令人不安 "的方式。"6 这些论点关注 "生命与非生命之间的相互关系",7 也推动了《受损星球上的生活艺术》编辑集的出版,该编辑集分为 "人类世的幽灵 "和 "人类世的怪物 "两个部分。本卷的编辑们问道:"我们如何才能回到过去,以便更清楚地看到现在?我们把这种对人类和非人类的多重过去的回归称为'幽灵'。每一处景观都被过去的生活方式所困扰",而且,如果生态文化的幽灵还不够多,"人类活动造成的景观也被想象中的未来所困扰"。"8 这种方法不仅与当前的生态哥特式思维产生共鸣,也与乔治-桑德斯(George Saunders)2017 年出版的小说《中阴林肯》(Lincoln in the Bardo)产生共鸣,该书充满鬼魂色彩,立足于一个非常具体的景观以及一个非常具体的历史时刻,但同时也具有时间流动性,并对可能的未来进行了慷慨的想象,最终摆脱了书中大部分情节发生地--华盛顿特区橡树山公墓(Oak Hill Cemetery)--的束缚、成熟的生态哥特式空间。Bardo 谈到了许多与生态哥特研究相关的问题:9 《中阴闻》讲述了与生态哥特研究相关的众多问题:生态恐惧纠葛;种族鬼魂;同性恋亡灵;超肉体现实;人类和环境机构问题;身体恐怖;植物恐怖(尤其是恶魔卷须);以及最终,对一个不可思议的国家的假设,如果这个国家真的存在,它将包括白人和黑人、社会特权阶层和底层阶级,同时也包括活人和亡灵,以及过去和未来,作为 1862 年战乱叙事中的现在。10因此,《林肯在中阴身》中的幽灵既是过去的公民,也是未来的公民。换句话说,小说中的鬼魂们固守着他们曾经完全活着的记忆,同时也在朝着亡灵机构的新理念迈进,使他们能够在死后重新定义自己作为美国人的身份。我认为,与此相关的是,生态哥特式在这部小说中以偶尔、闪烁的方式表现出来,是众多流派和模式中的一种,而不是一种主导模式。就像书中的亡灵人物一样,生态哥特式本身也在转变;《中阴闻集》照亮了明确无误的生态哥特式时刻,但更多的是提供了生态哥特式与多种其他模式之间的铰链,其中许多模式并不是......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecologies of the Undead: George Saunders's Lincoln in the Bardo and the Limits of the Ecogothic
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Ecologies of the Undead: George Saunders’s Lincoln in the Bardo and the Limits of the Ecogothic
  • Eric Gary Anderson (bio)

Introduction: The Outer Limits

“EcoGothic” is, as Elizabeth Parker has written, a “fledgling term.”1 Young as it is, it has already proven remarkably fruitful, in large part because it merges the open-endedness of ecocriticism with the ambiguities baked into gothic to describe an unsettling, elusive “ecocentric ambience” that has a long literary and cultural reach.2 The ecogothic thus extends an American (and, as Parker argues, transnational) gothic that is itself capacious, “less a genre than a fluid, ubiquitous literary mode.”3 Ecogothic studies is off to a quick start, with a dedicated scholarly journal, Gothic Nature; a monograph by the journal’s co-founder and co-editor, Parker; a collection of critical essays edited by Dawn Keetley and Matthew Wynn Sivils; and numerous journal articles and academic conferences. As Parker and co-editor Michelle Poland announce in the introduction to the second issue of Gothic Nature, published in 2021, “We live in ecoGothic times.”4

With this statement, Parker and Poland productively complicate the already formidable challenge of defining ecogothic by proposing that it encompasses not only grounded spatial locations—an old house in a dark forest, say—but also more abstract and more wide-ranging temporal coordinates. But what are “ecoGothic times?” What does it mean to view both space and time as both ecological and gothic? In his recent study of Anthropocene poetics, David Farrier points out that the Anthropocene by definition denotes human influence on physical environments and further posits that its “temporality . . . is [End Page 165] deeply menacing. Its breadth is bewildering.”5 Farrier goes on to suggest that a vocabulary of ghosts and hauntings can help us wrap our minds around the vastness of the problem, the “unsettling” ways in which “our present is in fact accompanied by deep pasts and deep futures.”6 Such arguments, with their attention to “the reciprocal relationship between life and nonlife,”7 also drive the edited collection Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet, which is organized into sections on “Ghosts of the Anthropocene” and “Monsters of the Anthropocene.” The editors of this volume ask: “How can we get back to the pasts we need to see the present more clearly? We call this return to multiple pasts, human and not human, ‘ghosts.’ Every landscape is haunted by past ways of life” and, as if that is not enough eco-cultural spectrality, “anthropogenic landscapes are also haunted by imagined futures.”8

Such approaches resonate not only with current ecogothic thinking but also with George Saunders’s 2017 novel Lincoln in the Bardo, which is ghost-saturated and anchored to a very specific landscape as well as to a very specific historical moment, yet also temporally fluid and generous in imagining possible futures that ultimately break free of the bounded, ripely ecogothic space where much of the book’s action takes place, Oak Hill Cemetery in Washington, DC.9 Bardo speaks to numerous concerns relevant to ecogothic studies: ecophobic entanglements; racial hauntings; queer undeadness; transcorporeality; questions of human and environmental agency; body horror; plant horror (especially demonic tendrils); and, ultimately, the positing of an uncanny nation that, if it were to come into being, would incorporate both whites and Blacks, both the socially privileged and underclasses, but also both the living and the undead and both the past and the future as bookends for a war-torn 1862 narrative present.10 Lincoln in the Bardo thus reads its ghosts as both past and future citizens. Put another way, the ghosts in this novel are anchored to their memories of having been fully alive and are also making their way toward new ideas of undead agency that enable them to redefine themselves posthumously as Americans. Relatedly, I argue, the ecogothic manifests in occasional, flickering ways in this novel, as one among many genres and modes, rather than as a dominant mode. Like the undead characters in the book, the ecogothic itself transforms; Bardo illuminates unmistakably ecogothic moments but more frequently offers hinges between the ecogothic and a wide variety of other modes, many of them not...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies in American Fiction suspended publication in the fall of 2008. In the future, however, Fordham University and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York will jointly edit and publish SAF after a short hiatus; further information and updates will be available from time to time through the web site of Northeastern’s Department of English. SAF thanks the College of Arts and Sciences at Northeastern University for over three decades of support. Studies in American Fiction is a journal of articles and reviews on the prose fiction of the United States, in its full historical range from the colonial period to the present.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信