关于《魔女》中的毁灭、奴隶制和美国景观

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Madelyn Walsh
{"title":"关于《魔女》中的毁灭、奴隶制和美国景观","authors":"Madelyn Walsh","doi":"10.1353/saf.2023.a923101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> On Ruination, Slavery, and the American Landscape in <em>Conjure Women</em> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Madelyn Walsh (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>The rot remains with us, the men are gone.</p> Derek Walcott, “Ruins of a Great House”<sup>1</sup> </blockquote> <p><strong>I</strong>n an ecogothic reading, Afia Atakora’s novel <em>Conjure Women</em> (2020) narrates the relationship between the American landscape as an ecological space and the horrors of transatlantic slavery for freed communities that continue to reside on the site of their enslavement.<sup>2</sup> In the transatlantic trade of enslaved African people, we can identify a socioecological catastrophe that altered the human relationship with the land through the use of unfree and dehumanized labor as part of agricultural practice. As Margo DeMello asserts, “a system of racial inequality emerged to justify a system of economic greed, and to reconcile the practice of inequality alongside of a philosophy of equality for all.”<sup>3</sup> The American plantation landscape became a site of slavery the enslaved were bound to, creating a perverse intimacy between the enslaved community and the land. The devastating impact enslavement had on the African American relationship with nature is best explored by Kimberly K. Smith. She asserts that transatlantic slavery provides an ambivalent legacy for African Americans when they are negotiating a relationship with nature, because “the slave system forced slaves into an intimacy with the natural environment but also tended to alienate them from it.”<sup>4</sup> Thus, a seemingly binding paradox emerges, whereby the African American relationship with the natural environment is defined by the slave system. The plantation setting acts as a microcosm through which to understand the ecological relationship between humans and nature as shaped by this system. This study therefore examines the socioecological relationship between the enslaved <strong>[End Page 209]</strong> community and the natural environment in the plantation landscape in <em>Conjure</em> by analyzing ruins in the novel. Through this examination, we might begin to conceive of what Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin describe as a “burgeoning alliance” between postcolonial studies and environmental studies by drawing together and analyzing the relationship between the enslaved and the land to which they were bound through an ecogothic lens.<sup>5</sup> This is a notable move away from the stereotypical association of ecology and ecocriticism with “pastoral and romantic representations of certain kinds of nature: the distant, pristine, and revered pastures and forests, rather than the urban rivers, the farm factories, or the cityscapes.”<sup>6</sup> It is at this point of division from classic ecocriticism that the ecogothic provides the lens needed to analyze this phenomenon.</p> <p>The ecogothic offers a nuanced approach to the identification and analysis of ruins in <em>Conjure</em> because it proffers a tool that can be used to circumvent the boundaries of ecocriticism and the gothic. The ecogothic, as defined by Dawn Keetley and Matthew Wynn Sivils, occupies “the intersection of environmental writing and the gothic, and it typically presupposes some kind of ecocritical lens.”<sup>7</sup> As Amanda Stuckey identifies, it also provides a means of overcoming the complications and boundaries of each critical framework. In their application of the ecogothic, Stuckey analyzes the ways in which gothic tropes “expose the material horrors of slavery as they played out on the surface of the Earth and of the human body.”<sup>8</sup> Stuckey therefore sets a precedent for using the ecogothic to re-examine gothic tropes and to explore the relationship between the earth and the human body in relation to slavery. Indeed, the advantage of applying an ecogothic lens lies in the fact that it “illuminates the fear, anxiety, and dread that often pervade [the cultural relationships of humans to the nonhuman world]: it orients us, in short, to the more disturbing and unsettling aspects of our interactions with nonhuman ecologies.”<sup>9</sup> I build on this development by using the ecogothic to identify the forms of ruins that remain on American plantations, including bodily ruins. I apply the ecogothic lens as a tool to resituate the gothic motif of ruins to include human bodies and the trauma they carry and inherit by living on geographical sites of slavery. This work therefore extends Stuckey’s by demonstrating how the ecogothic can be used not only to examine the intersections between ecocriticism and the gothic, but to overcome their respective...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42494,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Ruination, Slavery, and the American Landscape in Conjure Women\",\"authors\":\"Madelyn Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/saf.2023.a923101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> On Ruination, Slavery, and the American Landscape in <em>Conjure Women</em> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Madelyn Walsh (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>The rot remains with us, the men are gone.</p> Derek Walcott, “Ruins of a Great House”<sup>1</sup> </blockquote> <p><strong>I</strong>n an ecogothic reading, Afia Atakora’s novel <em>Conjure Women</em> (2020) narrates the relationship between the American landscape as an ecological space and the horrors of transatlantic slavery for freed communities that continue to reside on the site of their enslavement.<sup>2</sup> In the transatlantic trade of enslaved African people, we can identify a socioecological catastrophe that altered the human relationship with the land through the use of unfree and dehumanized labor as part of agricultural practice. As Margo DeMello asserts, “a system of racial inequality emerged to justify a system of economic greed, and to reconcile the practice of inequality alongside of a philosophy of equality for all.”<sup>3</sup> The American plantation landscape became a site of slavery the enslaved were bound to, creating a perverse intimacy between the enslaved community and the land. The devastating impact enslavement had on the African American relationship with nature is best explored by Kimberly K. Smith. She asserts that transatlantic slavery provides an ambivalent legacy for African Americans when they are negotiating a relationship with nature, because “the slave system forced slaves into an intimacy with the natural environment but also tended to alienate them from it.”<sup>4</sup> Thus, a seemingly binding paradox emerges, whereby the African American relationship with the natural environment is defined by the slave system. The plantation setting acts as a microcosm through which to understand the ecological relationship between humans and nature as shaped by this system. This study therefore examines the socioecological relationship between the enslaved <strong>[End Page 209]</strong> community and the natural environment in the plantation landscape in <em>Conjure</em> by analyzing ruins in the novel. Through this examination, we might begin to conceive of what Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin describe as a “burgeoning alliance” between postcolonial studies and environmental studies by drawing together and analyzing the relationship between the enslaved and the land to which they were bound through an ecogothic lens.<sup>5</sup> This is a notable move away from the stereotypical association of ecology and ecocriticism with “pastoral and romantic representations of certain kinds of nature: the distant, pristine, and revered pastures and forests, rather than the urban rivers, the farm factories, or the cityscapes.”<sup>6</sup> It is at this point of division from classic ecocriticism that the ecogothic provides the lens needed to analyze this phenomenon.</p> <p>The ecogothic offers a nuanced approach to the identification and analysis of ruins in <em>Conjure</em> because it proffers a tool that can be used to circumvent the boundaries of ecocriticism and the gothic. The ecogothic, as defined by Dawn Keetley and Matthew Wynn Sivils, occupies “the intersection of environmental writing and the gothic, and it typically presupposes some kind of ecocritical lens.”<sup>7</sup> As Amanda Stuckey identifies, it also provides a means of overcoming the complications and boundaries of each critical framework. In their application of the ecogothic, Stuckey analyzes the ways in which gothic tropes “expose the material horrors of slavery as they played out on the surface of the Earth and of the human body.”<sup>8</sup> Stuckey therefore sets a precedent for using the ecogothic to re-examine gothic tropes and to explore the relationship between the earth and the human body in relation to slavery. Indeed, the advantage of applying an ecogothic lens lies in the fact that it “illuminates the fear, anxiety, and dread that often pervade [the cultural relationships of humans to the nonhuman world]: it orients us, in short, to the more disturbing and unsettling aspects of our interactions with nonhuman ecologies.”<sup>9</sup> I build on this development by using the ecogothic to identify the forms of ruins that remain on American plantations, including bodily ruins. I apply the ecogothic lens as a tool to resituate the gothic motif of ruins to include human bodies and the trauma they carry and inherit by living on geographical sites of slavery. This work therefore extends Stuckey’s by demonstrating how the ecogothic can be used not only to examine the intersections between ecocriticism and the gothic, but to overcome their respective...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.2023.a923101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.2023.a923101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 论《女魔头》中的废墟、奴隶制和美国景观 马德琳-沃尔什(简历) 腐烂与我们同在,男人却已离去。德里克-沃尔科特(Derek Walcott),"大房子的废墟 "1 在生态哥特式的解读中,阿菲娅-阿塔科拉(Afia Atakora)的小说《女魔头》(Conjure Women,2020 年)叙述了作为生态空间的美国景观与跨大西洋奴隶制对继续居住在奴役地的获释族群的恐怖之间的关系2。在被奴役非洲人的跨大西洋贸易中,我们可以发现一场社会生态灾难,它通过使用非自由和非人化的劳动力作为农业实践的一部分,改变了人类与土地的关系。正如马戈-德梅洛(Margo DeMello)所断言的那样,"种族不平等制度的出现是为了证明经济贪婪制度的合理性,也是为了调和不平等做法与人人平等理念之间的矛盾"。金伯利-史密斯(Kimberly K. Smith)对奴役对非洲裔美国人与自然的关系造成的破坏性影响进行了最深入的探讨。她断言,跨大西洋奴隶制为非裔美国人在协商与自然的关系时提供了一种矛盾的遗产,因为 "奴隶制度迫使奴隶与自然环境亲密接触,但也往往使他们与自然环境疏远"。种植园环境是一个缩影,通过它我们可以了解这一制度所形成的人与自然之间的生态关系。因此,本研究通过分析小说中的废墟,探讨了《康居尔》中被奴役 [完 第 209 页] 群体与种植园景观中自然环境之间的社会生态关系。通过这一研究,我们可以开始构想格雷厄姆-休根和海伦-蒂芬所描述的后殖民地研究与环境研究之间的 "新兴联盟",即通过生态哥特式的视角,将被奴役者与他们被束缚的土地之间的关系联系起来并加以分析。这明显摆脱了生态学和生态批评与 "对某些自然的田园诗般的浪漫描述:遥远、原始、受人尊敬的牧场和森林,而不是城市河流、农场工厂或城市景观 "6 的刻板联系。正是在与经典生态批评的这一分界点上,生态哥特提供了分析这一现象所需的视角。生态哥特式为识别和分析《魔咒》中的废墟提供了一种细致入微的方法,因为它提供了一种工具,可以用来规避生态批评和哥特式的界限。根据道恩-基特利(Dawn Keetley)和马修-怀恩-西维尔斯(Matthew Wynn Sivils)的定义,"生态哥特式 "是 "环境写作与哥特式写作的交汇点,通常以某种生态批评视角为前提 "7 。8 因此,斯塔基开创了一个先例,即利用生态哥特式来重新审视哥特式传统,并探讨地球和人体与奴隶制之间的关系。事实上,运用生态哥特视角的优势在于,它 "照亮了[人类与非人类世界的文化关系]中经常弥漫的恐惧、焦虑和害怕:简而言之,它让我们看到了我们与非人类生态互动中更令人不安和不安的方面。我将生态哥特视角作为一种工具,重新定位哥特式废墟主题,将人类身体及其因生活在奴隶制地理遗址上而携带和继承的创伤纳入其中。因此,这部作品扩展了斯塔基的研究,证明了生态哥特学不仅可以用来研究生态批评与哥特学之间的交叉点,还可以用来克服它们各自的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Ruination, Slavery, and the American Landscape in Conjure Women
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • On Ruination, Slavery, and the American Landscape in Conjure Women
  • Madelyn Walsh (bio)

The rot remains with us, the men are gone.

Derek Walcott, “Ruins of a Great House”1

In an ecogothic reading, Afia Atakora’s novel Conjure Women (2020) narrates the relationship between the American landscape as an ecological space and the horrors of transatlantic slavery for freed communities that continue to reside on the site of their enslavement.2 In the transatlantic trade of enslaved African people, we can identify a socioecological catastrophe that altered the human relationship with the land through the use of unfree and dehumanized labor as part of agricultural practice. As Margo DeMello asserts, “a system of racial inequality emerged to justify a system of economic greed, and to reconcile the practice of inequality alongside of a philosophy of equality for all.”3 The American plantation landscape became a site of slavery the enslaved were bound to, creating a perverse intimacy between the enslaved community and the land. The devastating impact enslavement had on the African American relationship with nature is best explored by Kimberly K. Smith. She asserts that transatlantic slavery provides an ambivalent legacy for African Americans when they are negotiating a relationship with nature, because “the slave system forced slaves into an intimacy with the natural environment but also tended to alienate them from it.”4 Thus, a seemingly binding paradox emerges, whereby the African American relationship with the natural environment is defined by the slave system. The plantation setting acts as a microcosm through which to understand the ecological relationship between humans and nature as shaped by this system. This study therefore examines the socioecological relationship between the enslaved [End Page 209] community and the natural environment in the plantation landscape in Conjure by analyzing ruins in the novel. Through this examination, we might begin to conceive of what Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin describe as a “burgeoning alliance” between postcolonial studies and environmental studies by drawing together and analyzing the relationship between the enslaved and the land to which they were bound through an ecogothic lens.5 This is a notable move away from the stereotypical association of ecology and ecocriticism with “pastoral and romantic representations of certain kinds of nature: the distant, pristine, and revered pastures and forests, rather than the urban rivers, the farm factories, or the cityscapes.”6 It is at this point of division from classic ecocriticism that the ecogothic provides the lens needed to analyze this phenomenon.

The ecogothic offers a nuanced approach to the identification and analysis of ruins in Conjure because it proffers a tool that can be used to circumvent the boundaries of ecocriticism and the gothic. The ecogothic, as defined by Dawn Keetley and Matthew Wynn Sivils, occupies “the intersection of environmental writing and the gothic, and it typically presupposes some kind of ecocritical lens.”7 As Amanda Stuckey identifies, it also provides a means of overcoming the complications and boundaries of each critical framework. In their application of the ecogothic, Stuckey analyzes the ways in which gothic tropes “expose the material horrors of slavery as they played out on the surface of the Earth and of the human body.”8 Stuckey therefore sets a precedent for using the ecogothic to re-examine gothic tropes and to explore the relationship between the earth and the human body in relation to slavery. Indeed, the advantage of applying an ecogothic lens lies in the fact that it “illuminates the fear, anxiety, and dread that often pervade [the cultural relationships of humans to the nonhuman world]: it orients us, in short, to the more disturbing and unsettling aspects of our interactions with nonhuman ecologies.”9 I build on this development by using the ecogothic to identify the forms of ruins that remain on American plantations, including bodily ruins. I apply the ecogothic lens as a tool to resituate the gothic motif of ruins to include human bodies and the trauma they carry and inherit by living on geographical sites of slavery. This work therefore extends Stuckey’s by demonstrating how the ecogothic can be used not only to examine the intersections between ecocriticism and the gothic, but to overcome their respective...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies in American Fiction suspended publication in the fall of 2008. In the future, however, Fordham University and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York will jointly edit and publish SAF after a short hiatus; further information and updates will be available from time to time through the web site of Northeastern’s Department of English. SAF thanks the College of Arts and Sciences at Northeastern University for over three decades of support. Studies in American Fiction is a journal of articles and reviews on the prose fiction of the United States, in its full historical range from the colonial period to the present.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信