扳机点注射疗法对非心源性胸痛的疗效:随机对照试验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Mustafa Şengül, Sebahat Tekeli Şengül
{"title":"扳机点注射疗法对非心源性胸痛的疗效:随机对照试验。","authors":"Mustafa Şengül, Sebahat Tekeli Şengül","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of trigger point injections and stretching exercises in patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) associated with myofascial pain syndrome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial included 50 patients with noncardiac chest pain and trigger points in the pectoralis muscles between October 2019 and June 2020. The patients were randomly assigned to receive trigger point injections into the pectoralis muscles and exercise (n=25; 15 males, 10 females; mean age: 42.8±9.2 years; range, 25 to 57 years) or only perform exercise (n=25; 11 males, 14 females; mean age: 41.8±11.2 years; range, 18 to 60 years). The primary outcome was pain intensity at the first month and three months after the first treatment session, measured using the Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 100. The secondary outcome was the Nottingham Health Profile score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment with stretching exercises and trigger point injection resulted in significant pain reduction compared to stretching exercises alone, and the reduction was persistent at the three-month follow-up (p<0.001). A between-group comparison showed no significant difference in the Nottingham Health Profile (p=0.522). Complications related to the procedure or severe adverse events attributable to treatment were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trigger point injection combined with stretching exercises is an efficient treatment for noncardiac chest pain related to myofascial pain syndrome compared to exercise treatment alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 1","pages":"98-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of trigger point injection therapy in noncardiac chest pain: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Şengül, Sebahat Tekeli Şengül\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of trigger point injections and stretching exercises in patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) associated with myofascial pain syndrome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial included 50 patients with noncardiac chest pain and trigger points in the pectoralis muscles between October 2019 and June 2020. The patients were randomly assigned to receive trigger point injections into the pectoralis muscles and exercise (n=25; 15 males, 10 females; mean age: 42.8±9.2 years; range, 25 to 57 years) or only perform exercise (n=25; 11 males, 14 females; mean age: 41.8±11.2 years; range, 18 to 60 years). The primary outcome was pain intensity at the first month and three months after the first treatment session, measured using the Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 100. The secondary outcome was the Nottingham Health Profile score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment with stretching exercises and trigger point injection resulted in significant pain reduction compared to stretching exercises alone, and the reduction was persistent at the three-month follow-up (p<0.001). A between-group comparison showed no significant difference in the Nottingham Health Profile (p=0.522). Complications related to the procedure or severe adverse events attributable to treatment were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trigger point injection combined with stretching exercises is an efficient treatment for noncardiac chest pain related to myofascial pain syndrome compared to exercise treatment alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"98-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较触发点注射和拉伸运动对伴有肌筋膜疼痛综合征的非心源性胸痛(NCCP)患者的影响:这项前瞻性随机对照试验在2019年10月至2020年6月期间纳入了50名胸肌触发点的非心源性胸痛患者。患者被随机分配到接受胸肌触发点注射和锻炼(25 人;男性 15 人,女性 10 人;平均年龄:42.8±9.2 岁;年龄范围:25 至 57 岁)或仅进行锻炼(25 人;男性 11 人,女性 14 人;平均年龄:41.8±11.2 岁;年龄范围:18 至 60 岁)。主要结果是首次治疗后第一个月和三个月的疼痛强度,使用视觉模拟量表进行测量,范围从 0 到 100。次要结果是诺丁汉健康档案评分:结果:与单独进行拉伸运动相比,通过拉伸运动和扳机点注射治疗后,疼痛明显减轻,而且在三个月的随访中,疼痛减轻的情况仍在持续(p 结论:通过拉伸运动和扳机点注射治疗后,疼痛明显减轻,而且在三个月的随访中,疼痛减轻的情况仍在持续:与单纯的运动治疗相比,扳机点注射结合拉伸运动是治疗与肌筋膜疼痛综合征相关的非心源性胸痛的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of trigger point injection therapy in noncardiac chest pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of trigger point injections and stretching exercises in patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) associated with myofascial pain syndrome.

Patients and methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 50 patients with noncardiac chest pain and trigger points in the pectoralis muscles between October 2019 and June 2020. The patients were randomly assigned to receive trigger point injections into the pectoralis muscles and exercise (n=25; 15 males, 10 females; mean age: 42.8±9.2 years; range, 25 to 57 years) or only perform exercise (n=25; 11 males, 14 females; mean age: 41.8±11.2 years; range, 18 to 60 years). The primary outcome was pain intensity at the first month and three months after the first treatment session, measured using the Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 100. The secondary outcome was the Nottingham Health Profile score.

Results: Treatment with stretching exercises and trigger point injection resulted in significant pain reduction compared to stretching exercises alone, and the reduction was persistent at the three-month follow-up (p<0.001). A between-group comparison showed no significant difference in the Nottingham Health Profile (p=0.522). Complications related to the procedure or severe adverse events attributable to treatment were not reported.

Conclusion: Trigger point injection combined with stretching exercises is an efficient treatment for noncardiac chest pain related to myofascial pain syndrome compared to exercise treatment alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信