评估在家庭研究中使用 GEE 方法分析二元结果的情况:强心家庭研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xi Chen, Ying Zhang, Amanda M Fretts, Tauqeer Ali, Jason G Umans, Richard B Devereux, Elisa T Lee, Shelley A Cole, Yan Daniel Zhao
{"title":"评估在家庭研究中使用 GEE 方法分析二元结果的情况:强心家庭研究。","authors":"Xi Chen, Ying Zhang, Amanda M Fretts, Tauqeer Ali, Jason G Umans, Richard B Devereux, Elisa T Lee, Shelley A Cole, Yan Daniel Zhao","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2024.2333516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The generalized estimating equations method (GEE) is commonly applied to analyze data obtained from family studies. GEE is well known for its robustness on misspecification of correlation structure. However, the unbalanced distribution of family sizes and complicated genetic relatedness structure within each family may challenge GEE performance. We focused our research on binary outcomes. To evaluate the performance of GEE, we conducted a series of simulations, on data generated adopting the kinship matrix (correlation structure within each family) from the Strong Heart Family Study (SHFS). We performed a fivefold cross-validation to further evaluate the GEE predictive power on data from the SHFS. A Bayesian modeling approach, with direct integration of the kinship matrix, was also included to contrast with GEE. Our simulation studies revealed that GEE performs well on a binary outcome from families having a relatively simple kinship structure. However, data with a binary outcome generated from families with complex kinship structures, especially with a large genetic variance, can challenge the performance of GEE.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"424-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the use of GEE methods for analyzing binary outcomes in family studies: the Strong Heart Family Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Chen, Ying Zhang, Amanda M Fretts, Tauqeer Ali, Jason G Umans, Richard B Devereux, Elisa T Lee, Shelley A Cole, Yan Daniel Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10543406.2024.2333516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The generalized estimating equations method (GEE) is commonly applied to analyze data obtained from family studies. GEE is well known for its robustness on misspecification of correlation structure. However, the unbalanced distribution of family sizes and complicated genetic relatedness structure within each family may challenge GEE performance. We focused our research on binary outcomes. To evaluate the performance of GEE, we conducted a series of simulations, on data generated adopting the kinship matrix (correlation structure within each family) from the Strong Heart Family Study (SHFS). We performed a fivefold cross-validation to further evaluate the GEE predictive power on data from the SHFS. A Bayesian modeling approach, with direct integration of the kinship matrix, was also included to contrast with GEE. Our simulation studies revealed that GEE performs well on a binary outcome from families having a relatively simple kinship structure. However, data with a binary outcome generated from families with complex kinship structures, especially with a large genetic variance, can challenge the performance of GEE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"424-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2333516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2333516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广义估计方程法(GEE)通常用于分析从家庭研究中获得的数据。GEE 因其对相关结构的误设具有稳健性而闻名。然而,家族规模的不均衡分布和每个家族内部复杂的遗传相关性结构可能会对 GEE 的性能提出挑战。我们的研究重点是二元结果。为了评估 GEE 的性能,我们采用强心家庭研究(SHFS)的亲缘关系矩阵(每个家庭内部的相关结构)生成的数据进行了一系列模拟。我们进行了五倍交叉验证,以进一步评估 GEE 对 SHFS 数据的预测能力。我们还采用了贝叶斯建模方法,直接整合亲属关系矩阵,与 GEE 进行对比。我们的模拟研究表明,GEE 对来自亲属关系结构相对简单的家庭的二元结果具有良好的预测能力。然而,由具有复杂亲缘关系结构的家系产生的二元结果数据,尤其是具有较大遗传变异的数据,会对 GEE 的性能提出挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the use of GEE methods for analyzing binary outcomes in family studies: the Strong Heart Family Study.

The generalized estimating equations method (GEE) is commonly applied to analyze data obtained from family studies. GEE is well known for its robustness on misspecification of correlation structure. However, the unbalanced distribution of family sizes and complicated genetic relatedness structure within each family may challenge GEE performance. We focused our research on binary outcomes. To evaluate the performance of GEE, we conducted a series of simulations, on data generated adopting the kinship matrix (correlation structure within each family) from the Strong Heart Family Study (SHFS). We performed a fivefold cross-validation to further evaluate the GEE predictive power on data from the SHFS. A Bayesian modeling approach, with direct integration of the kinship matrix, was also included to contrast with GEE. Our simulation studies revealed that GEE performs well on a binary outcome from families having a relatively simple kinship structure. However, data with a binary outcome generated from families with complex kinship structures, especially with a large genetic variance, can challenge the performance of GEE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers: Drug, device, and biological research and development; Drug screening and drug design; Assessment of pharmacological activity; Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up; Preclinical safety assessment; Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics; Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs; Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety; Postmarketing surveillance; Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信